| Literature DB >> 28596594 |
Tomomitsu Tahara1, Jumpei Yamazaki2, Sayumi Tahara3, Masaaki Okubo4, Tomohiko Kawamura4, Noriyuki Horiguchi4, Takamitsu Ishizuka4, Mitsuo Nagasaka4, Yoshihito Nakagawa4, Tomoyuki Shibata4, Makoto Kuroda3, Naoki Ohmiya4.
Abstract
DNA methylation is associated with "field defect" in the gastric mucosa. To characterize "field defect" morphologically, we examined DNA methylation of non-neoplastic gastric mucosa in relation to their morphology seen by narrow-band imaging (NBI) with magnifying endoscopy. Magnifying NBI of non-neoplastic gastric body was classified as follows: normal-small and round pits with uniform subepithelial capillary networks; type 1-a little enlarged round pits with indistinct subepithelial capillary networks; type 2-remarkably enlarged pits with irregular vessels; and type 3-clearly demarcated oval or tubulovillous pits with bulky coiled or wavy vessels. Methylation of nine candidate genes (MYOD1, SLC16A12, GDNF, IGF2, MIR 124A1, CDH1, PRDM5, RORA and MLF1) were determined by bisulfite pyrosequencing. Infinium HumanMethylation450 array was used to characterize the methylation of >450,000 CpG sites. Mean Z score methylation of nine genes positively correlated with the changes of mucosal patterns from normal to types 1, 2, and 3 (P < 0.0001). Genome-wide analysis showed that development of mucosal patterns correlated with methylation accumulation especially at CpG islands. Genes with promoter CpG islands that were gradually methylated with the development of mucosal patterns significantly enriched the genes involved in zinc-related pathways. The results indicates that gastric mucosal morphology predicts a "field defect" in this tissue type. Accumulation of DNA methylation is associated with "field defect" in the non-neoplastic gastric mucosa. Endoscopic identification of "field defect" has important implications for preventing gastric cancer. Our results suggest that magnifying NBI of gastric mucosal morphology predicts a "field defect" in the gastric mucosa.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28596594 PMCID: PMC5465184 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03294-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinicopathological characteristics of subjects.
| Variables | |
|---|---|
| Total number | 94 |
| Age: median (range) | 64.5 (22–87) |
| Gender: male/female | 66/28 |
|
| 52/93* |
| Ulcer disease | 11 |
| GU/DU | 4/7 |
| Gastric cancer | 23 |
*For one case, H. pylori status was not determined. GU, gastric ulcer; DU, duodenal ulcer.
Figure 1Typical cases of 1 normal and 3 gastric mucosal patterns in the corpus seen with magnifying NBI endoscopy (Tahara et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:246-53). Normal: small, round pits surrounded by subepithelial capillary networks (red arrows). Type 1: slightly enlarged, round pit with unclear or irregular subepithelial capillary networks. Type 2: obviously enlarged, oval or prolonged pit with increased density of irregular vessels. Type 3: well-demarcated, oval or tubulovillous pit with clearly visible coiled or wavy vessels. subepithelial capillary networks.
Figure 2Mean Z score methylation of nine candidate genes in relation to the NBI mucosal patterns. Statistical analysis was performed using the Spearman correlation analysis.
Figure 3Methylation status of individual genes in relation to the NBI mucosal patterns (all P values < 0.0001). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA.
Multivariate analysis assessing the factors related to methylation-high cases.
| Variables | Odds ratio (95% confident interval) |
|
|---|---|---|
| NBI pattern | 8.55 (2.00–36.6) | 0.004 |
| Gender (male) | 3.76 (0.89–15.97) | 0.07 |
| Gastric cancer occurrence | 0.30 (0.05–1.92) | 0.2 |
| Inflammatory mucosa | 1.93 (0.55–6.74) | 0.3 |
| Atrophic mucosa | 0.39 (0.05–3.14) | 0.38 |
*Methylation high, mean Z score of methylation >0.15. *Mean Z score of methylation more than 0.15 was considered methylation high.
Figure 4Genome-wide methylation analysis in CpG islands (CGIs). (a–d) The development of mucosal patterns from normal to types 1, 2, and 3, and methylation accumulation in CGIs. (e) Mean number of methylated CGIs from normal to types 1, 2, and 3. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA. (f) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis of 10% of the most variant probes. Blue, yellow, red and black boxes represent normal and type 1, 2, and 3 samples, respectively. Sample ID numbers are listed above the boxes. (g) Gene expression fold change between normal to type 3 among genes codified by the gradually methylated PCGIs with the development of mucosal patterns from normal to types 1, 2, and 3 (41 genes) and others (231 genes). UP, upregulated > two fold; Down, downregulated > two fold; Statistical analysis was performed using chi square test. (h) Gene ontology analysis of genes codified by PCGIs that were gradually methylated with the development of mucosal patterns from normal to types 1, 2, and 3. The red bars represent significant enrichment of Zinc-related pathways. The black bar represents significant enrichment for other pathways.