Literature DB >> 28596015

Low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A National Cancer Database study.

Brandon-Luke L Seagle1, Arunima Shilpi2, Samuel Buchanan2, Chelain Goodman3, Shohreh Shahabi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide refined prognostic information from large cohorts of women with low-grade or high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS).
METHODS: We performed an observational retrospective cohort analysis of women diagnosed with low-grade or high-grade ESS from the 1998-2013 National Cancer Database. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable accelerated failure time survival analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors after multiple imputation of missing data. Recursive partitioning methods were used to rank prognostic factors in high-grade ESS. Matched cohort analyses were performed to hypothesis-test effects of adjuvant treatments.
RESULTS: We identified 2414 and 1383 women with low-grade or high-grade ESS, respectively. Women with high-grade ESS had markedly decreased survival compared to women with low-grade ESS (five-year survival (95% CI): 32.6 (30.1-35.3%) versus 90.5% (89.3-91.8%), P<0.001). Among women with high-grade ESS, median survival (95% CI) was only 19.9 (17.1-22.1) months. Increased age and tumor size were associated with decreased survival in low-grade ESS. In high-grade ESS, additional negative prognostic factors were distant or nodal metastasis, omission of lymphadenectomy, and pathologically-positive surgical margins (all P<0.001). Use of adjuvant chemotherapy (time ratio (TR) (95% CI): 1.36 (1.17-1.58), P<0.001) and radiotherapy (TR (95% CI): 1.57 (1.32-1.87), P<0.001) were associated with increased survival for high-grade ESS.
CONCLUSION: The contrasting excellent versus poor prognosis of low-grade versus high-grade ESS, respectively, was confirmed. The best treatment of high-grade ESS is early and complete surgical resection including lymphadenectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy may increase survival of women with high-grade ESS.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial stromal sarcoma; Prognosis; Sarcoma; Survival; Treatment; Uterine malignancy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28596015     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  26 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in the histological and molecular classification of endometrial stromal neoplasms.

Authors:  Joana Ferreira; Ana Félix; Jochen K Lennerz; Esther Oliva
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma versus undifferentiated uterine sarcoma: a Turkish uterine sarcoma group study-001.

Authors:  Ali Ayhan; Mehmet Tunc; Nurettin Boran; Ghanim Khatib; Mehmet Gokcu; Tayup Simsek; Ozlem Isiksacan Ozen; Tayfun Toptas; Ibrahim Yalcin; Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Pleomorphic high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with YWHAE gene amplification may be a novel variant with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Asad Ullah; Haritha Arbindi; Francis Zola; Samantha Nieves Mattox; Luis Velasquez Zarate; Janet Munroe; Saleh Heneidi; Suash Sharma; Sharad Ghamande; Daniel T Kleven
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 4.  LG-ESSs and HG-ESSs: underlying molecular alterations and potential therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Chunhui Li; Chunhong Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 5.  MR Imaging of uterine sarcomas: a comprehensive review with radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Filipa Alves E Sousa; Joana Ferreira; Teresa Margarida Cunha
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-09-01

6.  Primary characteristics and outcomes of newly diagnosed low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Authors:  Evan S Smith; Corinne Jansen; Kathryn M Miller; Sarah Chiang; Kaled M Alektiar; Martee L Hensley; Jennifer J Mueller; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.661

Review 7.  PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-IV. Gynecologic and Genitourinary Malignancies.

Authors:  Ahmed Ebada Salem; Gabriel C Fine; Matthew F Covington; Bhasker R Koppula; Richard H Wiggins; John M Hoffman; Kathryn A Morton
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 8.  Uterine fibroid-like tumors: spectrum of MR imaging findings and their differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Yenpo Lin; Ren-Chin Wu; Yen-Ling Huang; Kueian Chen; Shu-Chi Tseng; Chin-Jung Wang; Angel Chao; Chyong-Huey Lai; Gigin Lin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-03-26

9.  Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma.

Authors:  S Cabrera; V Bebia; U Acosta; S Franco-Camps; L Mañalich; A García-Jiménez; A Gil-Moreno
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  NTRK Fusions Define a Novel Uterine Sarcoma Subtype With Features of Fibrosarcoma.

Authors:  Sarah Chiang; Paolo Cotzia; David M Hyman; Alexander Drilon; William D Tap; Lei Zhang; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Denise Frosina; Achim A Jungbluth; Rajmohan Murali; Kay J Park; Robert A Soslow; Esther Oliva; A John Iafrate; Ryma Benayed; Marc Ladanyi; Cristina R Antonescu
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.