Literature DB >> 28595861

Comparison of Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Mineok Chang1, Cheol Whan Lee2, Jung-Min Ahn3, Rafael Cavalcante4, Yohei Sotomi5, Yoshinobu Onuma4, Minkyu Han6, Duk-Woo Park3, Soo-Jin Kang3, Seung-Whan Lee3, Young-Hak Kim3, Seong-Wook Park3, Patrick W Serruys7, Seung-Jung Park3.   

Abstract

There is limited data comparing effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). We compared the long-term outcomes of the 2 revascularization strategies in 1,246 patients presented with NSTE-ACS for left main or multivessel coronary artery disease. Data were pooled from the Randomized Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease (BEST) trial, the Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (PRECOMBAT) trial, and the Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 study groups. During the median follow-up of 60 months, the rate of the primary outcome was significantly lower with CABG than with PCI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56 to 0.98; p = 0.036). This difference was mainly attributed to a significant reduction in the rate of myocardial infarction (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.82, p = 0.006). The superiority of CABG over PCI was consistent across the major subgroups. The individual risks of death from any causes or stroke were not different between the 2 groups. In contrast, the rate of repeat revascularization was significantly lower in the CABG group than in the PCI group (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.75, p <0.001). In this study, among patients with NSTE-ACS for left main or multivessel coronary artery disease, CABG significantly reduces the risk of death from any causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with PCI with drug-eluting stents.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28595861     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Interaction Between Treatment and Age or Sex in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Disease and Three-Vessel Disease.

Authors:  Tianyu Li; Lin Jiang; Lianjun Xu; Jian Tian; Xueyan Zhao; Xinxing Feng; Dong Wang; Yin Zhang; Kai Sun; Jingjing Xu; Ru Liu; Bo Xu; Wei Zhao; Rutai Hui; Runlin Gao; Lei Song; Jinqing Yuan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Comparison of invasive treatment strategies in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rikuta Hamaya; Yuan Ting Chang; Api Chewcharat; Nicholas Chiu; Taishi Yonetsu; Tsunekazu Kakuta; Stefania Papatheodorou
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-09-08

3.  Commentary: Is this a case in which we know what we don't know what we don't know?

Authors:  Alex Nantsios; Fraser D Rubens
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-09-08

4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention compared to coronary artery bypass grafting in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Hristo Kirov; Tulio Caldonazo; Mohamed Rahouma; N Bryce Robinson; Michelle Demetres; Patrick W Serruys; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Mario Gaudino; Torsten Doenst
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.