Literature DB >> 28595659

Uses of nutrient profiling to address public health needs: from regulation to reformulation.

Adam Drewnowski1.   

Abstract

Nutrient profiling (NP) models rate the nutritional quality of individual foods, based on their nutrient composition. Their goal is to identify nutrient-rich foods, generally defined as those that contain more nutrients than calories and are low in fat, sugar and salt. NP models have provided the scientific basis for evaluating nutrition and health claims and regulating marketing and advertising to children. The food industry has used NP methods to reformulate product portfolios. To help define what we mean by healthy foods, NP models need to be based on published nutrition standards, mandated serving sizes and open-source nutrient composition databases. Specifically, the development and testing of NP models for public health should follow the seven decision steps outlined by the European Food Safety Authority. Consistent with this scheme, the nutrient-rich food (NRF) family of indices was based on a variable number of qualifying nutrients (from six to fifteen) and on three disqualifying nutrients (saturated fat, added sugar, sodium). The selection of nutrients and daily reference amounts followed nutrient standards for the USA. The base of calculation was 418·4 kJ (100 kcal), in preference to 100 g, or serving sizes. The NRF algorithms, based on unweighted sums of percent daily values, subtracted negative (LIM) from positive (NRn) subscores (NRn - LIM). NRF model performance was tested with respect to energy density and independent measures of a healthy diet. Whereas past uses of NP modelling have been regulatory or educational, voluntary product reformulation by the food industry may have most impact on public health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDA Food and Drug Administration; FNDDS Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies; NP nutrient profiling; NRF nutrient-rich food; RACC reference amounts customarily consumed; Nutrient profiling; Nutrient-rich food index; Nutrient-rich foods; Nutriscore

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28595659     DOI: 10.1017/S0029665117000416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc        ISSN: 0029-6651            Impact factor:   6.297


  19 in total

1.  Toward Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski; John Finley; Julie M Hess; John Ingram; Gregory Miller; Christian Peters
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2020-05-20

2.  Sustainability Dimensions of the Mediterranean Diet: A Systematic Review of the Indicators Used and Its Results.

Authors:  Joana Margarida Bôto; Ada Rocha; Vera Miguéis; Manuela Meireles; Belmira Neto
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 11.567

3.  Comparisons of Four Diet Quality Indexes to Define Single Meal Healthfulness.

Authors:  Sally L Bullock; Hilary M Miller; Alice S Ammerman; Anthony J Viera
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.910

4.  Perspective: Identifying Ultra-Processed Plant-Based Milk Alternatives in the USDA Branded Food Products Database.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 11.567

5.  Five year trends in the serve size, energy, and sodium contents of New Zealand fast foods: 2012 to 2016.

Authors:  Helen Eyles; Yannan Jiang; Tony Blakely; Bruce Neal; Jennifer Crowley; Christine Cleghorn; Cliona Ni Mhurchu
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Development of Criteria for a Positive Front-of-Package Food Labeling: The Israeli Case.

Authors:  Michal Gillon-Keren; Vered Kaufman-Shriqui; Rebecca Goldsmith; Carmit Safra; Iris Shai; Gila Fayman; Elliot Berry; Amir Tirosh; Dror Dicker; Oren Froy; Eli Gordon; Anat Chavia Chavia Ben-Yosef; Lesley Nitsan; Hava Altman; Moran Blaychfeld-Magnazi; Ronit Endevelt
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants [shortened version] scores are associated with Healthy Eating Index-2010 scores and other indices of diet quality in healthy adult omnivores and vegetarians.

Authors:  Carol S Johnston; Courtney Bliss; Jessica R Knurick; Cameron Scholtz
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  A proposed nutrient density score that includes food groups and nutrients to better align with dietary guidance.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski; Johanna Dwyer; Janet C King; Connie M Weaver
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.110

9.  The New Hybrid Nutrient Density Score NRFh 4:3:3 Tested in Relation to Affordable Nutrient Density and Healthy Eating Index 2015: Analyses of NHANES Data 2013-16.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski; Jessica Smith; Victor L Fulgoni
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Towards an Evidence-Based Recommendation for a Balanced Breakfast-A Proposal from the International Breakfast Research Initiative.

Authors:  Michael J Gibney; Susan I Barr; France Bellisle; Adam Drewnowski; Sisse Fagt; Sinead Hopkins; Barbara Livingstone; Gregorio Varela-Moreiras; Luis Moreno; Jessica Smith; Florent Vieux; Frank Thielecke; Gabriel Masset
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.