Kenneth S Kendler1, Henrik Ohlsson1, Dace S Svikis1, Kristina Sundquist1, Jan Sundquist1. 1. From the Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, the Department of Psychiatry, the Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, the Department of Psychology, and the Institute for Women's Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; and the Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to determine whether pregnancy is an intrinsic motivator for cessation of drug abuse. METHOD: The authors conducted prospective cohort, co-relative, co-spouse, and within-person analyses of registration for drug abuse during pregnancy among Swedish women born between 1980 and 1990 who gave birth between ages 20 and 35 (N=149,512). Drug abuse was assessed from medical, criminal, and pharmacy registries. RESULTS: In the population, rates of drug abuse were lower during pregnancy (unadjusted odds ratio=0.67, 95% CI=0.60, 0.74). Compared with population results, the negative association between pregnancy and drug abuse was moderately stronger in cousins (odds ratio=0.49, 95% CI=0.39, 0.62) and substantially stronger in siblings (odds ratio=0.35, 95% CI=0.24, 0.51) discordant for pregnancy. The estimated odds ratio for drug abuse in pregnancy-discordant monozygotic twins was even stronger, at 0.17 (95% CI=0.10, 0.31). Within individuals, the odds ratio for drug abuse while pregnant compared with an equivalent prepregnancy interval was similar to that seen in pregnancy-discordant monozygotic twins, at 0.22 (95% CI=0.19, 0.26). Compared with cohabiting fathers, mothers had a greater reduction in risk for drug abuse during pregnancy (odds ratio=0.40, 95% CI=0.34, 0.47). Pregnancy was more protective in women with low parental education and without a cohabiting, actively drug-abusing father. Compared with prepregnancy baseline, within-individual analyses indicate that risk for drug abuse is also substantially reduced in the postpartum period, for example, the odds ratio for postpartum days 0-242 was 0.13 (95% CI=0.11, 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Risk for drug abuse in women is substantially reduced during pregnancy. Multiple analyses suggest that this association is largely causal, suggesting that pregnancy is indeed a strong intrinsic motivator for drug abuse cessation. Similar strong protective effects may be present in the immediate postpartum period. Our results have implications for our etiologic models of drug abuse and especially for contingency management programs seeking to reduce drug abuse risk.
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to determine whether pregnancy is an intrinsic motivator for cessation of drug abuse. METHOD: The authors conducted prospective cohort, co-relative, co-spouse, and within-person analyses of registration for drug abuse during pregnancy among Swedish women born between 1980 and 1990 who gave birth between ages 20 and 35 (N=149,512). Drug abuse was assessed from medical, criminal, and pharmacy registries. RESULTS: In the population, rates of drug abuse were lower during pregnancy (unadjusted odds ratio=0.67, 95% CI=0.60, 0.74). Compared with population results, the negative association between pregnancy and drug abuse was moderately stronger in cousins (odds ratio=0.49, 95% CI=0.39, 0.62) and substantially stronger in siblings (odds ratio=0.35, 95% CI=0.24, 0.51) discordant for pregnancy. The estimated odds ratio for drug abuse in pregnancy-discordant monozygotic twins was even stronger, at 0.17 (95% CI=0.10, 0.31). Within individuals, the odds ratio for drug abuse while pregnant compared with an equivalent prepregnancy interval was similar to that seen in pregnancy-discordant monozygotic twins, at 0.22 (95% CI=0.19, 0.26). Compared with cohabiting fathers, mothers had a greater reduction in risk for drug abuse during pregnancy (odds ratio=0.40, 95% CI=0.34, 0.47). Pregnancy was more protective in women with low parental education and without a cohabiting, actively drug-abusing father. Compared with prepregnancy baseline, within-individual analyses indicate that risk for drug abuse is also substantially reduced in the postpartum period, for example, the odds ratio for postpartum days 0-242 was 0.13 (95% CI=0.11, 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Risk for drug abuse in women is substantially reduced during pregnancy. Multiple analyses suggest that this association is largely causal, suggesting that pregnancy is indeed a strong intrinsic motivator for drug abuse cessation. Similar strong protective effects may be present in the immediate postpartum period. Our results have implications for our etiologic models of drug abuse and especially for contingency management programs seeking to reduce drug abuse risk.
Entities:
Keywords:
Epidemiology; Psychoactive Substance Use Disorder
Authors: Wei Li Fang; Adam O Goldstein; Anne Y Butzen; S Allison Hartsock; Katherine E Hartmann; Margaret Helton; Jacob A Lohr Journal: J Am Board Fam Pract Date: 2004 Jul-Aug
Authors: Natalie P Mota; Mariette Chartier; Okechukwu Ekuma; Yao Nie; Jennifer M Hensel; Leonard MacWilliam; Chelsey McDougall; Simone Vigod; James M Bolton Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Rebecca L Newmark; Michelle L Zaydlin; Amy Yang; Kelcie Kuchenrither; Katherine L Wisner; Suena H Massey Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Suena H Massey; Daniel K Mroczek; James L Burns; Caron A C Clark; Kimberly A Espy; Lauren S Wakschlag Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Ann M Bruno; Nathan R Blue; Amanda A Allshouse; David M Haas; Anthony L Shanks; William A Grobman; Hyagriv Simhan; Uma M Reddy; Robert M Silver; Torri D Metz Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2021-09-01
Authors: Suena H Massey; Ryne Estabrook; Leiszle Lapping-Carr; Rebecca L Newmark; Jean Decety; Katherine L Wisner; Lauren S Wakschlag Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Alexis C Edwards; Henrik Ohlsson; Dace S Svikis; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist; Kenneth S Kendler Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 18.112