Literature DB >> 28595285

Quality of life predicts overall survival in women with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: an AURELIA substudy.

F T Roncolato1,2, E Gibbs1, C K Lee1,3, R Asher1, L C Davies1, V J Gebski1, M Friedlander4, F Hilpert5, L Wenzel6, M R Stockler1, M King7, E Pujade-Lauraine8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer are a heterogeneous group whose median overall survival is 12 months. We hypothesized that their quality of life (QoL) scores would be prognostic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from AURELIA (n = 326), a randomized trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab, were used to identify baseline QoL domains [EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) QLQ-C30 and OV28] that were significantly associated with overall survival in multivariable Cox regression analyses. Patients were classified as having good, medium, or poor risk. Cutpoints were validated in an independent dataset, CARTAXHY (n = 136). Multivariable analyses of significant QoL domains on survival were adjusted for clinicopathological prognostic factors. The additional QoL information was assessed using C statistic.
RESULTS: In AURELIA, all domains, except cognitive function, predicted overall survival in univariable analyses. Physical function (P < 0.001) and abdominal/gastrointestinal symptom (P < 0.001) scores remained significant in multivariable models. In high (score <67), medium (67-93), and low (>93) risk categories for physical function, median overall survival was 11.0, 14.7, and 19.3 months, respectively (P < 0.001). In CARTAXHY, median overall survival was 7.9, 16.2, and 23.9 months (P < 0.001), respectively. For high- (>44), medium- (13-44), and low- (<13) risk categories for abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms, median overall survival was 11.9, 14.3, and 19.7 months in AURELIA (P < 0.001) and 10.5, 19.6, and 24.1 months in CARTAXHY (P = 0.02). Physical function (P = 0.02) and abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms (P = 0.03) remained independent prognostic factors after adjustment for clinicopathological factors. The C statistic of the full model was 0.71. For QoL factors alone, patient factors alone and disease factors alone, the C statistics were 0.61, 0.61, and 0.67 respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Physical function and abdominal/gastrointestinal symptom scores improved predictions of overall survival over clinicopathological factors alone in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. This additional prognostic information could improve trial stratification, patient-doctor communication about prognosis, and clinical decision-making. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00976911.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  patient-reported outcomes; platinum-resistant ovarian cancer; prognosis; quality of life

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28595285      PMCID: PMC6410892          DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  20 in total

1.  An international field study of the reliability and validity of a disease-specific questionnaire module (the QLQ-OV28) in assessing the quality of life of patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  E Greimel; A Bottomley; A Cull; A-C Waldenstrom; J Arraras; L Chauvenet; B Holzner; K Kuljanic; J Lebrec; S D'haese
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  The prognostic effects of performance status and quality of life scores on progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M S Carey; M Bacon; D Tu; L Butler; A Bezjak; G C Stuart
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan.

Authors:  A N Gordon; J T Fleagle; D Guthrie; D E Parkin; M E Gore; A J Lacave
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Ovarian cancer: a focus on management of recurrent disease.

Authors:  Thomas J Herzog; Bhavana Pothuri
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2006-11

5.  Complexities in prognostication in advanced cancer: "to help them live their lives the way they want to".

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lamont; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Patient satisfaction with quality of life as a prognostic indicator in ovarian cancer patients treated in an integrative treatment setting.

Authors:  Digant Gupta; James F Grutsch; Christopher G Lis
Journal:  J Soc Integr Oncol       Date:  2008

7.  Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 trial.

Authors:  M K B Parmar; J A Ledermann; N Colombo; A du Bois; J-F Delaloye; G B Kristensen; S Wheeler; A M Swart; W Qian; V Torri; I Floriani; G Jayson; A Lamont; C Tropé
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-06-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  The prognostic significance of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Carolyn C Gotay; Crissy T Kawamoto; Andrew Bottomley; Fabio Efficace
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Second-line platinum therapy in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin.

Authors:  M Markman; R Rothman; T Hakes; B Reichman; W Hoskins; S Rubin; W Jones; L Almadrones; J L Lewis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Quality of life data as prognostic indicators of survival in cancer patients: an overview of the literature from 1982 to 2008.

Authors:  Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  4 in total

1.  Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Outcome Measures in the Thyroid Cancer Population.

Authors:  Eve M Roth; Carrie C Lubitz; John Shannon Swan; Benjamin C James
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 6.568

2.  Quality of Life and Adverse Events: Prognostic Relationships in Long-Term Ovarian Cancer Survival.

Authors:  Lari Wenzel; Kathryn Osann; Chelsea McKinney; David Cella; Giulia Fulci; Mary J Scroggins; Heather A Lankes; Victoria Wang; Kenneth P Nephew; George L Maxwell; Samuel C Mok; Thomas P Conrads; Austin Miller; Robert S Mannel; Heidi J Gray; Parviz Hanjani; Warner K Huh; Nick Spirtos; Mario M Leitao; Gretchen Glaser; Sudarshan K Sharma; Alessandro D Santin; Paul Sperduto; Shashikant B Lele; Robert A Burger; Bradley J Monk; Michael Birrer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Evaluating methodological quality of Prognostic models Including Patient-reported HeAlth outcomes iN oncologY (EPIPHANY): a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Nina Deliu; Francesco Cottone; Gary S Collins; Amélie Anota; Fabio Efficace
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Measuring Quality of Life in Ovarian Cancer Clinical Trials-Can We Improve Objectivity and Cross Trial Comparisons?

Authors:  Gita Bhat; Katherine Karakasis; Amit M Oza
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.