BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the ability of neuropsychological tests to differentiate autopsy-defined Alzheimer disease (AD) from subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD). METHODS: From a sample of 175 cases followed longitudinally that underwent autopsy, we selected 23 normal controls (NC), 20 SIVD, 69 AD, and 10 mixed cases of dementia. Baseline neuropsychological tests, including Memory Assessment Scale word list learning test, control oral word association test, and animal fluency, were compared between the three autopsy-defined groups. RESULTS: The NC, SIVD, and AD groups did not differ by age or education. The SIVD and AD groups did not differ by the Global Clinical Dementia Rating Scale. Subjects with AD performed worse on delayed recall (p < 0.01). A receiver operating characteristics analysis comparing the SIVD and AD groups including age, education, difference between categorical (animals) versus phonemic fluency (letter F), and the first recall from the word learning test distinguished the two groups with a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 67%, and positive likelihood ratio of 2.57 (AUC = 0.789, 95% CI 0.69-0.88, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In neuropathologically defined subgroups, neuropsychological profiles have modest ability to distinguish patients with AD from those with SIVD.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the ability of neuropsychological tests to differentiate autopsy-defined Alzheimer disease (AD) from subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD). METHODS: From a sample of 175 cases followed longitudinally that underwent autopsy, we selected 23 normal controls (NC), 20 SIVD, 69 AD, and 10 mixed cases of dementia. Baseline neuropsychological tests, including Memory Assessment Scale word list learning test, control oral word association test, and animal fluency, were compared between the three autopsy-defined groups. RESULTS: The NC, SIVD, and AD groups did not differ by age or education. The SIVD and AD groups did not differ by the Global Clinical Dementia Rating Scale. Subjects with AD performed worse on delayed recall (p < 0.01). A receiver operating characteristics analysis comparing the SIVD and AD groups including age, education, difference between categorical (animals) versus phonemic fluency (letter F), and the first recall from the word learning test distinguished the two groups with a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 67%, and positive likelihood ratio of 2.57 (AUC = 0.789, 95% CI 0.69-0.88, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In neuropathologically defined subgroups, neuropsychological profiles have modest ability to distinguish patients with AD from those with SIVD.
Authors: Helena C Chui; Chris Zarow; Wendy J Mack; William G Ellis; Ling Zheng; William J Jagust; Dan Mungas; Bruce R Reed; Joel H Kramer; Charles C Decarli; Michael W Weiner; Harry V Vinters Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Oscar L Lopez; Lewis H Kuller; Annette Fitzpatrick; Diane Ives; James T Becker; Norman Beauchamp Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Emily Frith; Nitin Shivappa; Joshua R Mann; James R Hébert; Michael D Wirth; Paul D Loprinzi Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Elizabeth E Blue; Joshua C Bis; Michael O Dorschner; Debby W Tsuang; Sandra M Barral; Gary Beecham; Jennifer E Below; William S Bush; Mariusz Butkiewicz; Carlos Cruchaga; Anita DeStefano; Lindsay A Farrer; Alison Goate; Jonathan Haines; Jim Jaworski; Gyungah Jun; Brian Kunkle; Amanda Kuzma; Jenny J Lee; Kathryn L Lunetta; Yiyi Ma; Eden Martin; Adam Naj; Alejandro Q Nato; Patrick Navas; Hiep Nguyen; Christiane Reitz; Dolly Reyes; William Salerno; Gerard D Schellenberg; Sudha Seshadri; Harkirat Sohi; Timothy A Thornton; Otto Valadares; Cornelia van Duijn; Badri N Vardarajan; Li-San Wang; Eric Boerwinkle; Josée Dupuis; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Richard Mayeux; Ellen M Wijsman Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Anders Wallin; Gustavo C Román; Margaret Esiri; Petronella Kettunen; Johan Svensson; George P Paraskevas; Elisabeth Kapaki Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472