Literature DB >> 28594716

Mesenteric Lymphadenectomy in Well-Differentiated Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Mustafa Raoof1, Sinziana Dumitra, Michael P O'Leary, Gagandeep Singh, Yuman Fong, Byrne Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the primary therapy for local and locally advanced appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors. The role of mesenteric lymphadenectomy in these patients is undefined.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define the role and prognostic significance of mesenteric lymphadenectomy.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective, observational study. SETTINGS: A population-based cohort from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (January 1988 to November 2013) was used. PATIENTS: Patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and nonmixed histologies undergoing surgical resection were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The risk of lymph node metastases as a function of tumor size and overall survival with respect to lymph node count and tumor size was measured. Lymph node cut-point was determined using the Contal and O'Quigely method.
RESULTS: Of the 573 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 64% were women, 79% were white, and 76% were <60 years of age. Seventy percent of the tumors were ≤2 cm, and 77% were lymph node negative. Median lymph nodes retrieved were 0 (interquartile range, 0-14). The probability of nodal metastases was 2.7% in tumors ≤1.0 cm, 31.0% in tumors 1.1 to 2.0 cm, and 64.0% in tumors >2.0 cm. The probability of a positive lymph node increased with increasing lymph node count up to 26 lymph nodes. An ideal cut-point of 12 lymph nodes was identified by statistical modeling. After adjustment in the multivariable model, the group with 12 or fewer lymph nodes examined had significantly worse overall survival (HR = 4.33 (95% CI, 1.54-12.15); p = 0.005; 5-year survival, 88% versus 96%) than the group with more than 12 lymph nodes examined. LIMITATIONS: Analysis was limited by the variables available in the database.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to date that looks at prognostic significance of lymph node count for well-differentiated appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors. Overall survival was worse where 12 or fewer lymph nodes were identified for tumors >1 cm. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A352.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28594716     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  3 in total

1.  Survival Profile and Prognostic Factors for Appendiceal Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A SEER Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Mengzhen Zheng; Tong Li; Yan Li; Tengfei Zhang; Lianfeng Zhang; Wang Ma; Lin Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Analysis of Appendiceal Neoplasms on 3544 Appendectomy Specimens for Acute Appendicitis: Retrospective Cohort Study of a Single Institution.

Authors:  Enver Kunduz; Huseyin Kazim Bektasoglu; Nurcan Unver; Ceyhun Aydogan; Gizem Timocin; Sebahattin Destek
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-06-27

3.  Patterns of Lymph Node Metastasis and Optimal Surgical Strategy in Small (≤20 mm) Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Yibo Cai; Zhuo Liu; Lai Jiang; Dening Ma; Zhenyuan Zhou; Haixing Ju; Yuping Zhu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 6.055

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.