Literature DB >> 28594628

Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review.

Iman Komaei1, Giuseppe Navarra1, Giuseppe Currò1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In the last decades, the three-dimensional (3D) imaging systems have been introduced in an attempt to improve depth perception and image quality during laparoscopic cholecystectomy interventions. The goal of our systematic review was to provide enough convincing evidences on superiority and benefits of 3D over two-dimensional (2D) imaging systems, from both surgeon's and patient's point of view, justifying the cost-effectiveness of newly developed 3D systems.
METHODS: Two authors separately performed a full literature search aiming to find randomized controlled trials evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of 3D versus 2D laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. The patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this study irrespective of their age and sex. Differing opinions between the two authors were reviewed by the third author.
RESULTS: A total of 912 articles were initially reviewed by their titles and abstracts for eligibility. After being filtered through predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and excluding the duplicates, only 10 studies underwent the final evaluation by the full text assessment. Eventually, only five randomized controlled studies were included in this study. Operative time and depth perception/image quality were set as the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. The operative time was significantly shorter in 60% of the studies. Of five studies that evaluated the depth perception and image quality, all five (100%) reported a better depth perception and image quality.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D imaging systems tend to shorten the operative time compared to 2D systems and result in a better depth perception. More studies and investigations with bigger cohort sizes and using unique 3D visual systems are necessary to justify the cost-effectiveness of the new, more expensive 3D systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparoscopic cholecystectomy; outcome; three-dimensional laparoscopy; two-dimensional laparoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28594628     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2017.0155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  10 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caiwen Han; Xinyi Shan; Liang Yao; Peijing Yan; Meixuan Li; Lidong Hu; Hongwei Tian; Wutang Jing; Binbin Du; Lixia Wang; Kehu Yang; Tiankang Guo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Randomized study of the influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging using a novel 3D head-mounted display (HMS-3000MT) on performance of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  M Patrzyk; M Klee; T Stefaniak; C D Heidecke; K Beyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  [3 D laparoscopy versus 2 D laparoscopy : An up to date evaluation].

Authors:  A Buia; S Farkas
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Tibor A Zwimpfer; Claudine Wismer; Bernhard Fellmann-Fischer; James Geiger; Andreas Schötzau; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-26

5.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Hanna Koppatz; Jukka Harju; Jukka Sirén; Panu Mentula; Tom Scheinin; Ville Sallinen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Short term outcomes of three dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Abdul Razaque Shaikh; Aijaz Ahmed Shaikh; Mujib Abbasi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Evaluation of Advanced Bimanual Skills in Novices Using the Wrist-Like FlexDex™ Articulating Laparoscopic Needle Holder in 2D and 3D Vision: A Randomised Trial.

Authors:  Nima Motahariasl; Sayed Borna Farzaneh; Sina Motahariasl; Ilya Kokotkin; Sara Sousi; Alexander Zargaran; David Zargaran; Bijendra Patel
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2021-12-30

8.  Achieving the critical view of safety in the difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study of predictors of failure.

Authors:  Ahmad H M Nassar; Hwei J Ng; Arkadiusz Peter Wysocki; Khurram Shahzad Khan; Ines C Gil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Systems in Urology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Najib Isse Dirie; Qing Wang; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Must Clinics Replace 2D by 3D Environments for an Efficient Training of Laparoscopic Novices? A Critical Analysis of the Learning Curve for Basic Skills.

Authors:  Maik Sahm; Clara Danzer; Alexis Leonhard Grimm; Christian Herrmann; Rene Mantke
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.