| Literature DB >> 28594386 |
Pedro C Santana-Mancilla1,2, Luis E Anido-Rifón3.
Abstract
In Mexico, many seniors are alone for most of the day or live in public nursing homes. Simple interaction with computer systems is required for older people. This is why we propose the exploration of a medium well known by seniors, such as the television (TV). The primary objective of this study is to improve the quality of life of seniors through an easier reminder system, using the television set. A technological platform was designed based on interactive television, through which seniors and their caregivers can have a better way to track their daily activities. Finally, an evaluation of the technology adoption was performed with 50 seniors living in two public nursing homes. The evaluation found that the elderly perceived the system as useful, easy to use, and they had a positive attitude and good intention to use it. This helped to generate initial evidence that the system supported them in achieving a better quality of life, by reminding them to take their medications and increasing their rate of attendance to their medical appointments.Entities:
Keywords: elderly; homecare; interactive television; public nursing homes; seniors; technology adoption
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28594386 PMCID: PMC5486303 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14060617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1System architecture.
Figure 2(a) Screen for adding medicine intake reminders; (b) Notification of the reminder while the older adults are watching TV.
Figure 3(a) Screen adding reminders for medical appointments; (b) Notification of the medical appointment while the older adults are watching TV.
Figure 4Information management by a caregiver.
Dimensions of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire.
| Dimension | No. of Items | Maximum Value on Likert Scale | Expected Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 4 | 28 | 25 |
| Usefulness | 4 | 28 | 25 |
| Attitude | 4 | 28 | 25 |
| Intention to use | 3 | 21 | 18 |
TAM questionnaire.
| Subscale | Item | Measure Scale | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived ease of use (Ease of use) | I would find iTVCare easy to use | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Learning to operate iTVCare would be easy for me | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| My interaction with iTVCare would be clear and understandable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| It would be easy for me to me to become skillful at using iTVCare | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Perceived usefulness (Usefulness) | Using iTVCare would enable me to accomplish tasks (medicine intake reminders and medical appointments) more quickly | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Using iTVCare would improve my performance (medicine intake reminders and medical appointments) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Using iTVCare would increase my productivity (medicine intake reminders and medical appointments) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| I would find iTVCare useful | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Attitude towards use (Attitude) | I feel certain about my attitude toward using iTVCare | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| I have a favorable attitude toward iTVCare use | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Using iTVCare is good | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| My using the iTVCare system is favorable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Behavioral intention to use (Intention to use) | I predict that I will use iTVCare on a regular basis in the future (given that I have access to the system) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| In the future, I plan to use iTVCare often | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| I intent to use iTVCare (Assuming I have access to the system) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
Results of TAM application.
| Dimension | Mean | Standard Deviation | Confidence Interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 21.66 | 3.91 | LI = 17.74 | LS = 23.58 |
| Usefulness | 22.08 | 4.32 | LI = 19.96 | LS = 24.20 |
| Attitude | 23.56 | 3.46 | LI = 21.86 | LS = 25.26 |
| Intention to use | 16.62 | 3.44 | LI = 14.93 | LS = 18.31 |
LS: upper limit; LI: lower limit.
Figure 5Frequency distribution of scores obtained by TAM participants.
Results of statistical test.
| Dimension | Observed (O) | Expected (E) | (O−E)2 | (O−E)2/E |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 21.66 | 25 | 11.16 | 0.45 |
| Usefulness | 22.08 | 25 | 8.53 | 0.34 |
| Attitude | 23.56 | 25 | 2.07 | 0.08 |
| Intention to use | 16.62 | 18 | 1.90 | 0.11 |
χ2 calculated = 0.98.
Pearson correlation between the factors.
| Dimension | Use | Attitude | Usefulness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attitude | 0.589 | - | - |
| Usefulness | 0.588 | 0.456 | - |
| Ease of use | 0.258 | 0.395 | 0.581 |
Figure 6Perceived ease of use of iTVCare.
Figure 7Perceived usefulness of iTVCare.
Figure 8Attitudes toward use iTVCare.
Figure 9Intention of use of iTVCare.