| Literature DB >> 28594358 |
Lukasz Klapiszewski1, Artur Jamrozik2,3, Beata Strzemiecka4, Danuta Matykiewicz5, Adam Voelkel6, Teofil Jesionowski7.
Abstract
Magnesium lignosulfonate and kraft lignin were activated by different oxidizing agents for use in phenolic resin composites used for the production of abrasive components. The physicochemical properties of the oxidized materials were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), dynamic mechanical-thermal analysis (DMTA) and inverse gas chromatography (IGC). The homogeneity of the model abrasive composites containing the studied products was assessed based on observations obtained using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). FTIR and XPS analysis of the oxidized products indicated that the activation process leads mainly to the formation of carbonyl groups. The IGC technique was used to assess changes in the surface energy and the acid-base properties of the studied biopolymers. The changes in the acid-base properties suggest that more groups acting as electron donors appear on the oxidized surface of the materials. DMTA studies showed that the model composites with 5% magnesium lignosulfonate oxidized by H₂O₂ had the best thermomechanical properties. Based on the results it was possible to propose a hypothetical mechanism of the oxidation of the natural polymers. The use of such oxidized products may improve the thermomechanical properties of abrasive articles.Entities:
Keywords: abrasive tool components; activation agents; kraft lignin; magnesium lignosulfonate; physicochemical and morphological characteristics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28594358 PMCID: PMC5486047 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18061224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1FTIR spectra of pure and activated magnesium lignosulfonate.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of pure and activated kraft lignin.
Vibrational wavenumbers (cm−1) attributed to magnesium lignosulfonate (MLS), kraft lignin (KL), and biopolymers activated using NaIO4 and H2O2.
| MLS | MLS NaIO4 | MLS H2O2 | KL | KL NaIO4 | KL H2O2 | Vibrational Assignment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3425 | 3390 | 3400 | 3426 | 3424 | 3447 | O–H stretching |
| 2940 | 2945 | 2940 | 2940 | 2942 | 2947 | C–Hx stretching |
| - | - | 1725 | - | - | 1705 | C=O stretching |
| 1610 | 1617 | - | 1600 | 1603 | 1612 | C–C, C=C (aromatic skeleton), stretching |
| 1515 | 1513 | 1514 | 1509 | 1517 | 1512 | |
| 1465 | 1460 | 1430 | 1465 | 1454 | 1465 | C–H (CH3 + CH2), bending |
| 1427 | 1430 | - | 1421 | 1427 | - | C–C, C=C (aromatic skeleton), stretching |
| 1379 | 1379 | - | - | 1396 | ||
| - | - | - | 1271 | 1270 | 1272 | C–O (guaiacyl unit) stretching |
| - | - | - | 1219 | 1221 | 1224 | C–OH (phenolic OH) stretching |
| 1179 | 1170 | 1172 | 1143 | - | 1145 | Aromatic C–H (guaiacyl unit), stretching |
| 1044 | 1045 | 1035 | 1045 | 1050 | 1048 | C–OH + C–O–C (aliphatic OH + ether) stretching, sulfonic acids |
| - | - | - | 856 | - | 861 | Aromatic C–H (guaiacyl unit), bending |
| - | - | - | 777 | - | Aromatic C–H (guaiacyl unit), bending | |
| - | - | - | 744 | 743 | - | |
| 654 | 649 | 662 | - | 627 | 624 | CHx bending |
Elemental composition of samples examined using XPS analysis.
| Sample | Region | Name | Binding Energy (eV) | Atomic Concentration (%) | Bonds Assignment | Mass Concentration (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnesium lignosulfonate (MLS) | C 1s | C 1s A | 284.7 | 65.4 | C–C | 63.0 |
| C 1s B | 286.0 | 25.4 | C–O | |||
| C 1s C | 287.0 | 6.1 | C=O | |||
| C 1s D | 288.9 | 3.0 | O=C–O– | |||
| O 1s | O 1s A | 532.0 | 38.5 | C=O | 26.0 | |
| O 1s B | 533.1 | 61.5 | C–O | |||
| MLS activated using NaIO4 | C 1s | C 1s A | 284.7 | 50.1 | C–C | 47.4 |
| C 1s B | 286.1 | 30.3 | C–O | |||
| C 1s C | 287.2 | 7.6 | C=O | |||
| C 1s D | 289.0 | 12.1 | O=C–O– | |||
| O 1s | O 1s A | 532.1 | 54.7 | C=O | 38.9 | |
| O 1s B | 533.3 | 45.3 | C–O | |||
| MLS activated using H2O2 | C 1s | C 1s A | 284.7 | 59.3 | C–C | 45.4 |
| C 1s B | 286.0 | 28.8 | C–O | |||
| C 1s C | 287.1 | 7.2 | C=O | |||
| C 1s D | 288.9 | 4.7 | O=C–O– | |||
| O 1s | O 1s A | 532.3 | 65.6 | C=O | 29.4 | |
| O 1s B | 533.3 | 34.4 | C–O | |||
| Kraft lignin (KL) | C 1s | C 1s A | 284.7 | 60.1 | C–C | 56.3 |
| C 1s B | 286.3 | 35.7 | C–O | |||
| C 1s C | 288.2 | 4.2 | O=C–O– | |||
| O 1s | O 1s A | 531.5 | 42.6 | C=O | 30.7 | |
| O 1s B | 533.1 | 57.4 | C–O | |||
| KL activated using NaIO4 | C 1s | C 1s A | 284.7 | 50.9 | C–C | 55.8 |
| C 1s B | 286.2 | 40.2 | C–O | |||
| C 1s C | 288.6 | 8.9 | O=C–O– | |||
| O 1s | O 1s A | 531.6 | 45.3 | C=O | 33.0 | |
| O 1s B | 533.0 | 54.7 | C–O | |||
| KL activated using H2O2 | C 1s | C 1s A | 284.7 | 54.5 | C–C | 39.3 |
| C 1s B | 286.2 | 34.9 | C–O | |||
| C 1s C | 287.4 | 3.5 | C=O | |||
| C 1s D | 288.6 | 7.1 | O=C–O– | |||
| O 1s | O 1s A | 531.7 | 63.7 | C=O | 31.3 | |
| O 1s B | 533.1 | 36.3 | C-O |
Figure 3Spectra of the O 1s XPS region for: (a) magnesium lignosulfonate (MLS); (b) MLS activated using H2O2; (c) kraft lignin (KL); and (d) KL activated using H2O2.
Figure 4Proposed mechanism of activation of magnesium lignosulfonate using NaIO4 and hydrogen peroxide.
Figure 5Proposed mechanism of activation of kraft lignin using NaIO4 and H2O2.
Values of storage modulus (G’), highest loss factor (tan δmax) and glass transition temperature (Tg) for the examined composites.
| Sample, Model Abrasive Composite With: | G’ 25 °C (GPa) | G’ 50 °C (GPa) | G’ 300 °C (GPa) | tan δmax (−) | Tg (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLS | 1.88 | 1.84 | 0.68 | 0.083 | 235 |
| MLS activated with NaIO4 | 2.22 | 2.12 | 1.08 | 0.055 | 250 |
| MLS activated with H2O2 | 3.45 | 3.39 | 1.52 | 0.079 | 247 |
| KL | 1.69 | 1.64 | 0.78 | 0.067 | 252 |
| KL activated with NaIO4 | 1.15 | 1.14 | 0.67 | 0.060 | 254 |
| KL activated with H2O2 | 2.10 | 2.07 | 1.06 | 0.090 | 250 |
Figure 6Mechanical-thermal properties of composites with lignosulfonates: (a) storage modulus; and (b) loss factor.
Figure 7Mechanical-thermal properties of composites with kraft lignin: (a) storage modulus; and (b) loss factor.
Figure 8Surface free energy and its components for lignosulfonate samples.
Figure 9Surface free energy and its components for kraft lignin samples.
Figure 10Scanning electron microscopy images of examined composites: (a) MLS; (b) MLS activated using NaIO4; (c) MLS activated using H2O2; (d) KL; (e) KL activated using NaIO4; and (f) KL activated using H2O2.
Figure 11Scanning electron microscopy images of examined composites: (a) MLS; (b) MLS activated using NaIO4; (c) MLS activated using H2O2; (d) KL; (e) KL activated using NaIO4; and (f) KL activated using H2O2.
Physicochemical data for the test compounds used; L means liquid as DM and EA.
| Compound | Dispersive Component | Acidic Component | Basic Component |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dichloromethane | 24.5 | 5.2 | 0.0 |
| Ethyl acetate | 23.9 | 0.0 | 6.2 |