Literature DB >> 28593731

Multimodal-3D imaging based on μMRI and μCT techniques bridges the gap with histology in visualization of the bone regeneration process.

R Sinibaldi1,2, A Conti1, B Sinjari3, S Spadone1, R Pecci4, M Palombo5,6, V S Komlev7, M G Ortore8, G Tromba9, S Capuani10, R Guidotti1, F De Luca5, S Caputi3, T Traini3, S Della Penna1,11.   

Abstract

Bone repair/regeneration is usually investigated through X-ray computed microtomography (μCT) supported by histology of extracted samples, to analyse biomaterial structure and new bone formation processes. Magnetic resonance imaging (μMRI) shows a richer tissue contrast than μCT, despite at lower resolution, and could be combined with μCT in the perspective of conducting non-destructive 3D investigations of bone. A pipeline designed to combine μMRI and μCT images of bone samples is here described and applied on samples of extracted human jawbone core following bone graft. We optimized the coregistration procedure between μCT and μMRI images to avoid bias due to the different resolutions and contrasts. Furthermore, we used an Adaptive Multivariate Clustering, grouping homologous voxels in the coregistered images, to visualize different tissue types within a fused 3D metastructure. The tissue grouping matched the 2D histology applied only on 1 slice, thus extending the histology labelling in 3D. Specifically, in all samples, we could separate and map 2 types of regenerated bone, calcified tissue, soft tissues, and/or fat and marrow space. Remarkably, μMRI and μCT alone were not able to separate the 2 types of regenerated bone. Finally, we computed volumes of each tissue in the 3D metastructures, which might be exploited by quantitative simulation. The 3D metastructure obtained through our pipeline represents a first step to bridge the gap between the quality of information obtained from 2D optical microscopy and the 3D mapping of the bone tissue heterogeneity and could allow researchers and clinicians to non-destructively characterize and follow-up bone regeneration.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D mapping; X-ray computed microtomography; bone regeneration; image coregistration; micro magnetic resonance imaging; multimodal imaging; multivariate clustering

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28593731     DOI: 10.1002/term.2494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  10 in total

1.  Effect of Surface Tooling Techniques of Medical Titanium Implants on Bacterial Biofilm Formation In Vitro.

Authors:  Sonia Sarfraz; Pilvi-Helinä Mäntynen; Marisa Laurila; Juho Suojanen; Juha Saarnio; Sami Rossi; Jani Horelli; Mika Kaakinen; Junnu Leikola; Justus Reunanen
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Optimized 3D co-registration of ultra-low-field and high-field magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Roberto Guidotti; Raffaele Sinibaldi; Cinzia De Luca; Allegra Conti; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Koos C J Zevenhoven; Per E Magnelind; Vittorio Pizzella; Cosimo Del Gratta; Gian Luca Romani; Stefania Della Penna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Geometric Reproducibility of Three-Dimensional Oral Implant Planning Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Franz Sebastian Schwindling; Sophia Boehm; Christopher Herpel; Dorothea Kronsteiner; Lorenz Vogel; Alexander Juerchott; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Peter Rammelsberg; Tim Hilgenfeld
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Periodontal Tissue as a Biomaterial for Hard-Tissue Regeneration following bmp-2 Gene Transfer.

Authors:  Mariko Yamamoto Kawai; Ryosuke Ozasa; Takuya Ishimoto; Takayoshi Nakano; Hiromitsu Yamamoto; Marina Kashiwagi; Shigeki Yamanaka; Kazumasa Nakao; Hiroki Maruyama; Kazuhisa Bessho; Kiyoshi Ohura
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Automatic intra-subject registration and fusion of multimodal cochlea 3D clinical images.

Authors:  Ibraheem Al-Dhamari; Rania Helal; Olesia Morozova; Tougan Abdelaziz; Roland Jacob; Dietrich Paulus; Stephan Waldeck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Accuracy and Reliability of CBCT Compared to Clinical Probing in Detection of Trifurcation Defects: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Mohammad Alsakr; Adriana G Creanga; Abdullah Saad Alqahtani; Khalid Gufran
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  Micro-computed tomography for assessing the internal and external voids of bulk-fill composite restorations: A technical report.

Authors:  Vincenzo Tosco; Riccardo Monterubbianesi; Michele Furlani; Alessandra Giuliani; Angelo Putignano; Giovanna Orsini
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2022-06-02

8.  Biomechanical Analyses of Porous Designs of 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Mandibular Segmental Osteotomy Defects.

Authors:  Yen-Wen Shen; Yuen-Shan Tsai; Jui-Ting Hsu; Ming-You Shie; Heng-Li Huang; Lih-Jyh Fuh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Covariates Relating to Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Loss of a Novel Triangular Neck-Implant Placed by Post-Graduate Students: A 1-Year Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Maria Giralt-Hernando; Gian Maria Ragucci; Oriol Cantó-Naves; Adaia Valls-Ontañón; Federico Hernández-Alfaro
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Peri-Implant Repair Using a Modified Implant Macrogeometry in Diabetic Rats: Biomechanical and Molecular Analyses of Bone-Related Markers.

Authors:  Hugo Robertson Sant'Anna; Marcio Zaffalon Casati; Mounir Colares Mussi; Fabiano Ribeiro Cirano; Suzana Peres Pimentel; Fernanda Vieira Ribeiro; Mônica Grazieli Corrêa
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.