| Literature DB >> 28593421 |
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a standard treatment for patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis. Whereas its use was first limited to inoperable high-risk patients, recent studies demonstrated that TAVR was not inferior to standard surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for intermediate-risk patients. Besides equivalent outcomes, the type and rates of complications differ between the two procedures. Here, we provide an overview of the latest randomized study results comparing TAVR with SAVR and describe possible future directions in transcatheter aortic valve treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Aortic valve stenosis; Current evidence; Future directions; Surgical aortic valve replacement; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28593421 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-017-4585-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Herz ISSN: 0340-9937 Impact factor: 1.443