Literature DB >> 28593267

National Trends in Use and Outcomes of Pulmonary Artery Catheters Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999-2013.

Kevin Ikuta1, Yun Wang2,3, Austin Robinson1, Tariq Ahmad4, Harlan M Krumholz2,4, Nihar R Desai2,4.   

Abstract

Importance: Recent studies have observed an increase in the rate of pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use in heart failure admissions. Little is known about the national trends in other previously common indications for PAC placement, PAC use overall, or outcomes associated with PAC placement. Objective: To determine national trends in PAC use overall as well as across sociodemographic groups and key clinical conditions, including acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and respiratory failure. Design, Setting, and Participants: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims data and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to conduct a serial cross-sectional cohort study between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2013, identifying hospitalizations during which a PAC was placed. Data analysis was conducted from September 25, 2015, to April 10, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate of use of a PAC per 1000 admissions, 30-day mortality, and length of stay.
Results: Among the 68 374 904 unique Medicare beneficiaries in the study, there were 469 582 hospitalizations among 457 193 patients (204 232 women and 252 961 men; mean [SD] age, 76.3 [6.9] years) during which a PAC was placed. There was a 67.8% relative decrease in PAC use (6.28 per 1000 admissions in 1999 to 2.02 per 1000 admissions in 2013; P < .001), with 2 distinct trends: significant year-on-year decreases from 1999 to 2011, followed by stable use through 2013. There was variation in rates of PAC use across race/ethnicity, age, and sex, but use decreased across all subgroups. Although there were sustained decreases in PAC use for acute myocardial infarction (20.0 PACs placed per 1000 admissions in 1999 to 5.2 in 2013 [74.0% reduction]; P < .001 for trend) and respiratory failure (29.9 PACs placed per 1000 admission in 1999 to 2.3 in 2013 [92.3% reduction]; P < .001 for trend) during the study period, there was an initial decrease in PAC use in heart failure, with a nadir in 2009 followed by a subsequent increase (9.1 PACs placed per 1000 admissions in 1999 to 4.0 in 2009 to 5.8 in 2013). In-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and length of stay decreased during the study period. Conclusions and Relevance: In the wake of mounting evidence suggesting a lack of benefit to the routine use of PACs, there has been a de-adoption of PAC use overall and across sociodemographic groups but heterogeneity in patterns of use across clinical conditions. The clinical outcomes of patients with PACs have significantly improved. These findings raise important questions about the optimal use of PACs and the drivers of the observed trends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28593267      PMCID: PMC5815078          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  12 in total

1.  Ongoing Use of Pulmonary Artery Catheters Despite Negative Trial Findings.

Authors:  Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury.

Authors:  Arthur P Wheeler; Gordon R Bernard; B Taylor Thompson; David Schoenfeld; Herbert P Wiedemann; Ben deBoisblanc; Alfred F Connors; R Duncan Hite; Andrea L Harabin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness: the ESCAPE trial.

Authors:  Cynthia Binanay; Robert M Califf; Vic Hasselblad; Christopher M O'Connor; Monica R Shah; George Sopko; Lynne W Stevenson; Gary S Francis; Carl V Leier; Leslie W Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012.

Authors:  Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen; Michael Bailey; Satoshi Suzuki; David Pilcher; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Trends in comorbidity, disability, and polypharmacy in heart failure.

Authors:  Catherine Y Wong; Sarwat I Chaudhry; Mayur M Desai; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Variation in Hospital Use and Outcomes Associated With Pulmonary Artery Catheterization in Heart Failure in the United States.

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Ambarish Pandey; Nilay Kumar; Rajeev Singh; Shah Bano; Harsh Golwala; Dharam J Kumbhani; Saket Girotra; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 8.790

8.  The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators.

Authors:  A F Connors; T Speroff; N V Dawson; C Thomas; F E Harrell; D Wagner; N Desbiens; L Goldman; A W Wu; R M Califf; W J Fulkerson; H Vidaillet; S Broste; P Bellamy; J Lynn; W A Knaus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-09-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.

Authors:  R P Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care.

Authors:  Sujanthy S Rajaram; Nayan K Desai; Ankur Kalra; Mithil Gajera; Susan K Cavanaugh; William Brampton; Duncan Young; Sheila Harvey; Kathy Rowan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28
View more
  13 in total

1.  Is there still a place for the Swan‒Ganz catheter? We are not sure.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Ludhmila A Hajjar; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Mechanical circulatory support device-heart hysteretic interaction can predict left ventricular end diastolic pressure.

Authors:  Brian Y Chang; Steven P Keller; Sonya S Bhavsar; Noam Josephy; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Variation in Frequency of Intraoperative Arterial, Central Venous and Pulmonary Artery Catheter Placement During Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis of Invasive Monitoring Trends.

Authors:  Alexander Nagrebetsky; Richard P Dutton; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 4.  A Critical Review of Hemodynamically Guided Therapy for Cardiogenic Shock: Old Habits Die Hard.

Authors:  Iyad N Isseh; Ran Lee; Rola Khedraki; Karlee Hoffman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-03-23

5.  Dynamic Modulation of Device-Arterial Coupling to Determine Cardiac Output and Vascular Resistance.

Authors:  Steven P Keller; Brian Y Chang; Qing Tan; Zhengyang Zhang; Ahmad El Katerji; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 6.  Right Heart Catheterization-Background, Physiological Basics, and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Grzegorz M Kubiak; Agnieszka Ciarka; Monika Biniecka; Piotr Ceranowicz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  Pulmonary artery catheterization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A review of contemporary literature.

Authors:  Shiva P Ponamgi; Muhammad Haisum Maqsood; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Michael G DelCore; Arun Kanmanthareddy; Wissam A Jaber; William J Nicholson; Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-26

8.  Pulmonary artery catheter use in acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Aditi Shankar; Sri Harsha Patlolla; Abhiram Prasad; Malcolm R Bell; Jacob C Jentzer; Shilpkumar Arora; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula; Bernard J Gersh; Allan S Jaffe; David R Holmes; Shannon M Dunlay; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-04-02

9.  Long-term predictive value of stroke volume index obtained from right heart catheterization: Insights from the veterans affairs clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking program.

Authors:  Anthony A Bavry; Edward Hess; Stephen W Waldo; Anna E Barón; Dharam J Kumbhani; Deepak L Bhatt; Ambarish Pandey
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  Right Heart Catheterization in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Improved Outcomes: Insights From the Nationwide Readmissions Database.

Authors:  Sagar Ranka; Ioannis Mastoris; Navin K Kapur; Ryan J Tedford; Aniket Rali; Prakash Acharya; Robert Weidling; Amandeep Goyal; Andrew J Sauer; Bhanu Gupta; Nicholas Haglund; Kamal Gupta; James C Fang; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Zubair Shah
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.