Kevin Ikuta1, Yun Wang2,3, Austin Robinson1, Tariq Ahmad4, Harlan M Krumholz2,4, Nihar R Desai2,4. 1. Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
Importance: Recent studies have observed an increase in the rate of pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use in heart failure admissions. Little is known about the national trends in other previously common indications for PAC placement, PAC use overall, or outcomes associated with PAC placement. Objective: To determine national trends in PAC use overall as well as across sociodemographic groups and key clinical conditions, including acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and respiratory failure. Design, Setting, and Participants: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims data and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to conduct a serial cross-sectional cohort study between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2013, identifying hospitalizations during which a PAC was placed. Data analysis was conducted from September 25, 2015, to April 10, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate of use of a PAC per 1000 admissions, 30-day mortality, and length of stay. Results: Among the 68 374 904 unique Medicare beneficiaries in the study, there were 469 582 hospitalizations among 457 193 patients (204 232 women and 252 961 men; mean [SD] age, 76.3 [6.9] years) during which a PAC was placed. There was a 67.8% relative decrease in PAC use (6.28 per 1000 admissions in 1999 to 2.02 per 1000 admissions in 2013; P < .001), with 2 distinct trends: significant year-on-year decreases from 1999 to 2011, followed by stable use through 2013. There was variation in rates of PAC use across race/ethnicity, age, and sex, but use decreased across all subgroups. Although there were sustained decreases in PAC use for acute myocardial infarction (20.0 PACs placed per 1000 admissions in 1999 to 5.2 in 2013 [74.0% reduction]; P < .001 for trend) and respiratory failure (29.9 PACs placed per 1000 admission in 1999 to 2.3 in 2013 [92.3% reduction]; P < .001 for trend) during the study period, there was an initial decrease in PAC use in heart failure, with a nadir in 2009 followed by a subsequent increase (9.1 PACs placed per 1000 admissions in 1999 to 4.0 in 2009 to 5.8 in 2013). In-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and length of stay decreased during the study period. Conclusions and Relevance: In the wake of mounting evidence suggesting a lack of benefit to the routine use of PACs, there has been a de-adoption of PAC use overall and across sociodemographic groups but heterogeneity in patterns of use across clinical conditions. The clinical outcomes of patients with PACs have significantly improved. These findings raise important questions about the optimal use of PACs and the drivers of the observed trends.
Importance: Recent studies have observed an increase in the rate of pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use in heart failure admissions. Little is known about the national trends in other previously common indications for PAC placement, PAC use overall, or outcomes associated with PAC placement. Objective: To determine national trends in PAC use overall as well as across sociodemographic groups and key clinical conditions, including acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and respiratory failure. Design, Setting, and Participants: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims data and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to conduct a serial cross-sectional cohort study between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2013, identifying hospitalizations during which a PAC was placed. Data analysis was conducted from September 25, 2015, to April 10, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate of use of a PAC per 1000 admissions, 30-day mortality, and length of stay. Results: Among the 68 374 904 unique Medicare beneficiaries in the study, there were 469 582 hospitalizations among 457 193 patients (204 232 women and 252 961 men; mean [SD] age, 76.3 [6.9] years) during which a PAC was placed. There was a 67.8% relative decrease in PAC use (6.28 per 1000 admissions in 1999 to 2.02 per 1000 admissions in 2013; P < .001), with 2 distinct trends: significant year-on-year decreases from 1999 to 2011, followed by stable use through 2013. There was variation in rates of PAC use across race/ethnicity, age, and sex, but use decreased across all subgroups. Although there were sustained decreases in PAC use for acute myocardial infarction (20.0 PACs placed per 1000 admissions in 1999 to 5.2 in 2013 [74.0% reduction]; P < .001 for trend) and respiratory failure (29.9 PACs placed per 1000 admission in 1999 to 2.3 in 2013 [92.3% reduction]; P < .001 for trend) during the study period, there was an initial decrease in PAC use in heart failure, with a nadir in 2009 followed by a subsequent increase (9.1 PACs placed per 1000 admissions in 1999 to 4.0 in 2009 to 5.8 in 2013). In-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and length of stay decreased during the study period. Conclusions and Relevance: In the wake of mounting evidence suggesting a lack of benefit to the routine use of PACs, there has been a de-adoption of PAC use overall and across sociodemographic groups but heterogeneity in patterns of use across clinical conditions. The clinical outcomes of patients with PACs have significantly improved. These findings raise important questions about the optimal use of PACs and the drivers of the observed trends.
Authors: Arthur P Wheeler; Gordon R Bernard; B Taylor Thompson; David Schoenfeld; Herbert P Wiedemann; Ben deBoisblanc; Alfred F Connors; R Duncan Hite; Andrea L Harabin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-05-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Cynthia Binanay; Robert M Califf; Vic Hasselblad; Christopher M O'Connor; Monica R Shah; George Sopko; Lynne W Stevenson; Gary S Francis; Carl V Leier; Leslie W Miller Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-10-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A F Connors; T Speroff; N V Dawson; C Thomas; F E Harrell; D Wagner; N Desbiens; L Goldman; A W Wu; R M Califf; W J Fulkerson; H Vidaillet; S Broste; P Bellamy; J Lynn; W A Knaus Journal: JAMA Date: 1996-09-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: R P Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Brian Y Chang; Steven P Keller; Sonya S Bhavsar; Noam Josephy; Elazer R Edelman Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Steven P Keller; Brian Y Chang; Qing Tan; Zhengyang Zhang; Ahmad El Katerji; Elazer R Edelman Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Shiva P Ponamgi; Muhammad Haisum Maqsood; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Michael G DelCore; Arun Kanmanthareddy; Wissam A Jaber; William J Nicholson; Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula Journal: World J Cardiol Date: 2021-12-26
Authors: Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Aditi Shankar; Sri Harsha Patlolla; Abhiram Prasad; Malcolm R Bell; Jacob C Jentzer; Shilpkumar Arora; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula; Bernard J Gersh; Allan S Jaffe; David R Holmes; Shannon M Dunlay; Gregory W Barsness Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2020-04-02
Authors: Anthony A Bavry; Edward Hess; Stephen W Waldo; Anna E Barón; Dharam J Kumbhani; Deepak L Bhatt; Ambarish Pandey Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Sagar Ranka; Ioannis Mastoris; Navin K Kapur; Ryan J Tedford; Aniket Rali; Prakash Acharya; Robert Weidling; Amandeep Goyal; Andrew J Sauer; Bhanu Gupta; Nicholas Haglund; Kamal Gupta; James C Fang; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Zubair Shah Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-08-21 Impact factor: 5.501