| Literature DB >> 28593166 |
Jorge Arroyo-Acevedo1,2, Oscar Herrera-Calderón3, Roberto Chávez-Asmat2,4, Andrea Anampa-Guzmán4, Víctor Chumpitaz-Cerrate5, Edwin Enciso-Roca6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The main objective was to evaluate the possible protective effect of Chuquiraga spinosa extract on N-methyl nitrosourea (NMU)-induced prostate cancer in rats and DU-145 cell line.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-inflammatory; Antigenotoxicity; Antioxidant; Chuquiraga spinosa; Cytotoxicity
Year: 2017 PMID: 28593166 PMCID: PMC5448729 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2017.01.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prostate Int ISSN: 2287-8882
Phytochemical constituents of Chuquiraga spinosa extract.
| Constituent | Test | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Phenols | Ferric chloride | (+++) |
| Protein | Ninhydrin | (+) |
| Steroids | Liebermann–Buchard | (+) |
| Flavonoids | Shinoda | (+++) |
| Saponins | Frothing | (++) |
| Alkaloids | Dragendorff | (++) |
| Mayer | (+++) | |
| Hager | (−) | |
| Anthraquinones | Bornträger | (−) |
| Tannins | Gelatin | (+) |
+++, large amount; ++, medium amount; +, small amount; −, absent.
Fig. 1Antioxidant effect of Chuquiraga spinosa extract. DPPH, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl; Vit C, vitamin C.
Effect of Chuquiraga spinosa extract on hematological parameters.
| Parameter treatment | Hb | Hct | Leukocytes | HDL (mg/dL) | Cholesterol (mg/dL) | Triglycerides (mg/dL) | Glucose (mg/dL) | Urea (mg/dL) | ALT (UI/dL) | FA (UI/dL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P80 | 11.8 ± 0.9 | 37.0 ± 1.9 | 7816 ± 1680 | 30.6 ± 7.0 | 115.5 ± 6.4 | 152.5 ± 14.0 | 100.0 ± 8.5 | 18.5 ± 5.2 | 18.3 ± 8.0 | 135.6 ± 32.8 |
| Inductor | 13.1 ± 1.8 | 38.8 ± 7.1 | 7455 ± 1110 | 41.6 ± 7.2 | 105.3 ± 17.5 | 127.1 ± 13.8 | 90.0 ± 8.8 | 17.5 ± 5.4 | 27.0 ± 13.6 | 128.1 ± 25.0 |
| ChS50 | 11.7 ± 1.5 | 34.8 ± 6.1 | 6578 ± 2547 | 37.4 ± 5.5 | 125.8 ± 23.4 | 145.2 ± 36.2 | 91.0 ± 8.0 | 19.0 ± 6.4 | 23.4 ± 13.0 | 135.2 ± 40.1 |
| ChS250 | 11.5 ± 0.8 | 36.6 ± 1.5 | 7640 ± 1816 | 33.2 ± 8.2 | 124.8 ± 12.4 | 166.6 ± 31.6 | 98.2 ± 8.1 | 18.4 ± 5.8 | 15.8 ± 5.8 | 140.8 ± 33.9 |
| ChS500 | 13.0 ± 1.2 | 39.0 ± 4.6 | 8120 ± 1371 | 41.4 ± 7.5 | 114.4 ± 10.4 | 121.2 ± 18.0 | 95.4 ± 10.0 | 24.0 ± 7.5 | 31.4 ± 14.1 | 130.4 ± 32.9 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 6). Analysis of variance (P = 0.034).
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ChS50, ChS250, and ChS500, 50 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, and 500 mg/kg C. spinosa ethanolic extract, respectively; FA, fatty acid; Hb, hemoglobin; Hct, hematocrit; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; P80, polysorbate 80.
Tukey test (P = 0.04) versus Inductor Group.
Effect of Chuquiraga spinosa extract on biochemical parameters.
| Parameter treatment | SOD | MDA | NO | CRP | PSA total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P80 | 116.0 ± 16.2 | 1.9 ± 1.3 | 1.2 ± 0.9 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.1 ± 0.0 |
| Inductor | 464.8 ± 73.9 | 15.9 ± 3.7 | 137.0 ± 43.7 | 3.5 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.2 |
| ChS50 | 261.2 ± 26.5 | 3.0 ± 0.4 | 74.8 ± 33.6 | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
| ChS250 | 173.8 ± 40.7 | 8.0 ± 3.9 | 64.9 ± 31.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.3 |
| ChS500 | 128.2 ± 34.6 | 5.0 ± 2.3 | 104.7 ± 25.2 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.6 ± 0.3 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 6).Analysis of variance (P < 0.01).
CRP, C-reactive protein; ChS50, ChS250, and ChS500, 50 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, and 500 mg/kg C. spinosa ethanolic extract, respectively; MDA, malondialdehyde; P80, polysorbate 80; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; SOD, superoxide dismutase.
Tukey test (P < 0.01) versus Inductor Group.
Tukey test (P < 0.05) versus Inductor Group.
Fig. 3Effect of Chuquiraga spinosa extract on the frequency of MNPCEs. Each value represents mean ± standard deviation (n = 6). Analysis of variance (P = 0.01). * Tukey test (P < 0.01) versus Inductor Group. ChS50, ChS250, and ChS500, 50 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, and 500 mg/kg C. spinosa ethanolic extract, respectively; MNPCE, micronucleated polychromatic erythrocyte; P80, polysorbate 80.
Fig. 2Effect of Chuquiraga spinosa extract on volume and weight of prostate. Each value represents mean ± standard deviation (n = 6). (A) Volume: analysis of variance (P = 0.012). (B) Weight: analysis of variance (P = 0.002). * Tukey test (P < 0.01) versus Inductor Group. ** Tukey test (P < 0.05) versus Inductor Group. ChS50, ChS250, and ChS500, 50 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, and 500 mg/kg C. spinosa ethanolic extract, respectively; P80, polysorbate 80.
Fig. 4Hematoxylin and eosin staining of prostates from control and experimental animals (400×). (A) P80: normal prostate. (B) Inductor Group: hypertrophy of cells, hyperplasia of glands, and large amount of dysplasia. (C) ChS50: mild reduction in glands with surrounding fibrosis. (D) ChS250: colloids and hypertrophy. (E) ChS500: glandular hyperplasia, cells of different sizes and thickened capsule. ChS50, ChS250, and ChS500, 50 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, and 500 mg/kg C. spinosa ethanolic extract, respectively; P80, polysorbate 80.
Cytotoxicity and IC50 of Chuquiraga spinosa extract and 5-FU in DU-145 and 3T3 cell lines.
| Cytotoxic substances | IC50 (ug/mL) | Selectivity index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DU-145 | 3T3 | ||
| 2.98 ± 0.2 | 51.4 ± 0.4 | 17.24 | |
| Control | – | – | – |
| 5-FU | 9.3 ± 0.9 | 0.035 ± 0.01 | 0.0037 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration.