BACKGROUND: Two=dimensional motion analysis of lower=extremity movement typically focuses on the knee frontal plane projection angle, which considers the position of the femur and the tibia. A measure that includes the pelvis may provide a more comprehensive and accurate indicator of lower=extremity movement. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of the study was to describe the utility of a two=dimensional dynamic valgus index (DVI) in females with patellofemoral pain. The hypothesis was that the DVI would be more reliable and valid than the knee frontal plane projection angle, be greater in females with patellofemoral pain during a single=limb squat than in females without patellofemoral pain, and decrease in females with patellofemoral pain following instruction. Study Design: Controlled Laboratory Study. METHODS: Data were captured while participants performed single limb squats under two conditions: usual and corrected. Two=dimensional hip and knee angles and a DVI that combined the hip and knee angles were calculated. Three=dimensional sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane angles of the hip and knee and a DVI combining the frontal and transverse plane angles were calculated. RESULTS: The two=dimensional DVI demonstrated moderate reliability (ICC=0.74). The correlation between the two=dimensional and three=dimensional DVI's was 0.635 (p<0001). Females with patellofemoral pain demonstrated a greater two=dimensional DVI (31.14 °±13.36 °) than females without patellofemoral pain (18.30 °±14.97 °; p=0.010). Females with patellofemoral pain demonstrated a decreased DVI in the corrected (19.04 °±13.70 °) versus usual (31.14 °±13.36 °) condition (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: The DVI is a reliable and valid measure that may provide a more comprehensive assessment of lower=extremity movement patterns than the knee frontal plane projection angle in individuals with lower=extremity musculoskeletal pain problems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.
BACKGROUND: Two=dimensional motion analysis of lower=extremity movement typically focuses on the knee frontal plane projection angle, which considers the position of the femur and the tibia. A measure that includes the pelvis may provide a more comprehensive and accurate indicator of lower=extremity movement. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of the study was to describe the utility of a two=dimensional dynamic valgus index (DVI) in females with patellofemoral pain. The hypothesis was that the DVI would be more reliable and valid than the knee frontal plane projection angle, be greater in females with patellofemoral pain during a single=limb squat than in females without patellofemoral pain, and decrease in females with patellofemoral pain following instruction. Study Design: Controlled Laboratory Study. METHODS: Data were captured while participants performed single limb squats under two conditions: usual and corrected. Two=dimensional hip and knee angles and a DVI that combined the hip and knee angles were calculated. Three=dimensional sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane angles of the hip and knee and a DVI combining the frontal and transverse plane angles were calculated. RESULTS: The two=dimensional DVI demonstrated moderate reliability (ICC=0.74). The correlation between the two=dimensional and three=dimensional DVI's was 0.635 (p<0001). Females with patellofemoral pain demonstrated a greater two=dimensional DVI (31.14 °±13.36 °) than females without patellofemoral pain (18.30 °±14.97 °; p=0.010). Females with patellofemoral pain demonstrated a decreased DVI in the corrected (19.04 °±13.70 °) versus usual (31.14 °±13.36 °) condition (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: The DVI is a reliable and valid measure that may provide a more comprehensive assessment of lower=extremity movement patterns than the knee frontal plane projection angle in individuals with lower=extremity musculoskeletal pain problems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.
Authors: Richard B Souza; Christie E Draper; Michael Fredericson; Christopher M Powers Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: John H Hollman; Barbara E Ginos; Jakub Kozuchowski; Amanda S Vaughn; David A Krause; James W Youdas Journal: J Sport Rehabil Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Gretchen B Salsich; Barbara Yemm; Karen Steger-May; Catherine E Lang; Linda R Van Dillen Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 3.477
Authors: Sophia Ulman; Ashley Erdman; Alex Loewen; Michael Dressing; Charles Wyatt; Gretchen Oliver; Lauren Butler; Dai Sugimoto; Amanda M Black; Joseph Janosky Journal: Front Sports Act Living Date: 2022-06-24
Authors: Magdalena Zawadka; Jakub Smolka; Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska; Edyta Lukasik; Aleksandra Bys; Grzegorz Zielinski; Piotr Gawda Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Lauren S Butler; Eryn K Milian; Amie DeVerna; Kevin Latz; Henry B Ellis; Alexa R Martinez; Kristin Hayden; Christian Gerstenkorn; Sara C Carpenito; Charles W Wyatt; Dai Sugimoto Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2021-04-01
Authors: María Orosia Lucha-López; José Miguel Tricás-Moreno; Elena Gaspar-Calvo; Ana Carmen Lucha-López; Concepción Vidal-Peracho; César Hidalgo-García; Santos Caudevilla-Polo; Pablo Fanlo-Mazas Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 1.671
Authors: Paloma Guillén-Rogel; David Barbado; Cristina Franco-Escudero; Cristina San Emeterio; Pedro J Marín Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-22 Impact factor: 3.390