| Literature DB >> 28593074 |
Charles Atombo1,2,3, Chaozhong Wu1,2, Emmanuel O Tettehfio3, Godwin Y Nyamuame3, Aaron A Agbo4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the recent rapid industrialization, occupational safety and health (OSH) has become an important issue in all industrial and human activities. However, incidents of injuries and fatality rates in the Ghanaian industry sector continue to increase. Despite this increase, there is no evidence regarding the element of OSH management in transport activities in Ghanaian industries. Thus, this study aims to examine the perceptions regarding the importance of safety and health in work-related transport activities in Ghanaian industries.Entities:
Keywords: industries; occupational health; safety culture; safety perceptions; work-related transport activities
Year: 2016 PMID: 28593074 PMCID: PMC5447414 DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.10.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saf Health Work ISSN: 2093-7911
Reliability test and descriptive analysis
| No | Variables | No of items | α | Mean/SD | Range | Median | Mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Safety & health perceptions | 50 | 0.80 | 2.88/0.66 | 2.92 | 2.88 | 2.37 |
| 2 | Safe vehicle usage | 7 | 0.71 | 2.98/0.78 | 3.43 | 3.00 | 2.90 |
| 3 | Safe driving environment | 11 | 0.76 | 2.72/0.73 | 3.00 | 2.73 | 2.73 |
| 4 | Drivers safety practices | 11 | 0.88 | 2.59/0.92 | 3.18 | 2.36 | 4.27 |
α, Cronbach α; SD, standard deviation.
A higher mean value indicates a higher possibility of integrating health and safety perceptions in transport activities.
Correlation between safety measures variables and safety and health perceptions∗
| Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Safe vehicle usage | – | |||
| 2. | Safe driving environment | 0.52 | – | ||
| 3. | Drivers safety practice | 0.59 | 0.74 | – | |
| 4. | Safety & health perceptions | 0.49 | 0.71 | 0.75 | – |
The correlations between the variables were scaled scores based on the average of items contained in each latent variable.
p < 0.001 (2-tailed).
Standard regression analysis for predicting safety and health perception (N = 298)
| Variables | B | SE | R2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Drivers safety practice | 0.37 | 0.05 | 0.42 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 384.57 |
| 2 | Safe driving environment | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 0.64 | 0.07 | 0.63 | 263.93 |
| 3 | Safe vehicle usage | −0.23 | 0.07 | −0.25 | 0.66 | 0.02 | 0.65 | 144.43 |
SE, standard error; B, unstandardized regression coefficient; β, standardized regression coefficient; AdjR2, Adjusted R square.
p < 0.001.
p < 0.05.
The mean and standard deviation (in brackets) of safe vehicle usage items, in predicting safety and health perception
| Variables | Mean (SD) | Rank | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate to indicate your response toward the following safety practice for safe vehicle usage. | |||||
| 1 | Suitable means of access to & from cabs. | 3.02 (1.41) | 5 | 0.50 | 0.16 |
| 2 | Comfort of the driver in the vehicle cab (i.e., vibration damping, noise reduction, adjustable seating, good ventilation, & weather protection) | 3.12 (1.33) | 3 | 0.05 | −0.01 |
| 3 | Protection device for the driver (e.g., seatbelts, rollover protection system, guards, exposed exhaust pipes) | 2.91 (1.35) | 6 | 0.50 | 0.20 |
| 4 | Condition of the vehicle in good working order | 3.16 (1.39) | 2 | 0.28 | 0.22 |
| 5 | Reverse-in-safety systems (e.g., CCTV, wide angle mirrors, sirens) | 2.39 (0.96) | 7 | 0.06 | −0.11 |
| 6 | Regular & timely vehicle maintenance | 3.17 (1.29) | 1 | 0.12 | −0.06 |
| 7 | Records keeping relating to a vehicle’s maintenance history | 3.07 (1.39) | 4 | 0.50 | 0.31 |
| Total mean | 2.98 | ||||
CCTV , closed circuit television; SD, standard deviation; β, standardized regression coefficient.
A higher mean value indicates a positive attitude toward safety and health standards.
Indicate the correlations between the items in the safe vehicle usage and safety and health perceptions.
p < 0.001.
p < 0.05.
The mean and standard deviation of safe driving environment items, in predicting safety and health perceptions
| Variables | Mean (SD) | Rank | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate to indicate your response toward the following safety practice for safe driving environment. | |||||
| 1 | The roads & footways are suitable for the types & volumes of vehicular & pedestrian traffic. | 2.26 (0.94) | 10 | 0.41 | −0.03 |
| 2 | Vehicles & pedestrians kept safely apart. | 2.66 (1.27) | 6 | 0.30 | 0.06 |
| 3 | Safe pedestrian route that allows visiting drivers to report for instruction when entering the workplace. | 2.60 (1.39) | 7 | 0.30 | −0.01 |
| 4 | Adequate numbers of suitable parking places for all vehicles. | 3.19 (1.52) | 2 | 0.52 | 0.31 |
| 5 | The level of lighting in each area is sufficient for the pedestrian & vehicle activity. | 3.18 (1.51) | 3 | 0.52 | 0.13 |
| 6 | Vehicle routes are free from obstructions & congestion. | 2.72 (1.35) | 5 | 0.35 | 0.12 |
| 7 | The provision of signs (i.e., directional, speed limit, give-way, no-entry). | 3.35 (1.44) | 1 | 0.54 | 0.34 |
| 8 | Vehicle activity at peak pedestrian times is minimized (e.g., shift change, meal times). | 3.11 (1.53) | 4 | 0.52 | 0.12 |
| 9 | The provision of a 1-way system, speed bumps, & a speed limit. | 2.50 (1.26) | 8 | 0.47 | 0.12 |
| 10 | Pedestrian routes are free from obstruction & congestion. | 2.29 (0.85) | 9 | 0.28 | 0.09 |
| 11 | Provision of a designated area for reversing operations. | 2.03 (0.95) | 11 | 0.37 | 0.14 |
| Total mean | 2.72 | ||||
SD, standard deviation; β, standardized regression coefficient.
A higher mean value indicates a positive attitude toward safety and health standards.
Indicate the correlations between the items in the safe driving environment and safety and health perceptions variable.
p < 0.001.
p < 0.05.
The mean and standard deviation (in brackets) of drivers' safety practice items, in predicting safety and health
| Variables | Mean (SD) | Rank | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate to indicate your response toward the following safety practice for driver’s safety | |||||
| 1 | Drivers possess the necessary licenses for the vehicles they are authorized to drive. | 2.12 (0.93) | 8 | 0.61 | 0.26 |
| 2 | Checking the previous experience of drivers & assess them to ensure their competence. | 2.11 (0.95) | 9 | 0.63 | 0.28 |
| 3 | Providing site specific training on how to perform the job, & information regarding particular hazards, speed limits, the appropriate parking & loading areas, etc. | 2.80 (1.54) | 6 | 0.48 | 0.43 |
| 4 | Planned program of refresher training for drivers to ensure their continued competence. | 1.96 (0.97) | 10 | 0.50 | 0.10 |
| 5 | Checking drivers' tiredness & fatigue. | 3.18 (1.60) | 1 | 0.47 | 0.02 |
| 6 | Pedestrian awareness of vehicle capabilities. | 1.87 (0.96) | 11 | 0.49 | 0.04 |
| 7 | The supervision of drivers. | 2.84 (1.51) | 4 | 0.54 | 0.45 |
| 8 | Following safe driving procedures (e.g., drive within speed limit, park within designated areas). | 2.84 (1.51) | 4 | 0.54 | 0.24 |
| 9 | Provision of personal protective equipment (e.g., high visibility clothing, safety shoes etc.). | 2.80 (1.54) | 6 | 0.48 | −0.32 |
| 10 | A role for drivers to check that their vehicle is safe and report any problems. | 2.85 (1.51) | 3 | 0.54 | −0.47 |
| 11 | Random drugs & alcohol tests for drivers. | 3.15 (1.59) | 2 | 0.51 | 0.22 |
| Total mean | 2.59 | ||||
SD, standard deviation; β, standardized regression coefficient.
A higher mean value indicates positive attitude toward safety and health standards.
Indicate the correlations between the items in the drivers' safety practice and health and safety perceptions.
p < 0.001.
p < 0.05.