| Literature DB >> 28592858 |
F Lanfranconi1, A Ferri2,3, G Corna2, R Bonazzi2, C Lunetta4, V Silani5,6, N Riva7, A Rigamonti8, A Maggiani9, C Ferrarese2,10, L Tremolizzo2,10.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate muscle oxidative function during exercise in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients (pALS) with non-invasive methods in order to assess if determinants of reduced exercise tolerance might match ALS clinical heterogeneity. 17 pALS, who were followed for 4 months, were compared with 13 healthy controls (CTRL). Exercise tolerance was assessed by an incremental exercise test on cycle ergometer measuring peak O2 uptake ([Formula: see text]O2peak), vastus lateralis oxidative function by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and breathing pattern ([Formula: see text]E peak). pALS displayed: (1) 44% lower [Formula: see text]O2peak vs. CTRL (p < 0.0001), paralleled by a 43% decreased peak skeletal muscle oxidative function (p < 0.01), with a linear regression between these two variables (r2 = 0.64, p < 0.0001); (2) 46% reduced [Formula: see text]Epeak vs. CTRL (p < 0.0001), achieved by using an inefficient breathing pattern (increasing respiratory frequency) from the onset until the end of exercise. Inefficient skeletal muscle O2 function, when flanking the impaired motor units recruitment, is a major determinant of pALS clinical heterogeneity and working capacity exercise tolerance. CPET and NIRS are useful tools for detecting early stages of oxidative deficiency in skeletal muscles, disclosing individual impairments in the O2 transport and utilization chain.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28592858 PMCID: PMC5462750 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02811-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (pALS).
| pALS n = 17 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 52.2 ± 9.7 (39–70) | Sex, F/M | 3/14 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.6 ± 2.9 (18.7–29.9) | EDC, definite/probable | 10/7 |
| FFM, kg | 60.7 ± 11.2 (36.1–72.5) | Onset, B/S | 4/13 |
| ALSFRS-R | 37.1 ± 6.2 (26–46) | NIV, no/yes | 12/5 |
| DET, months | 13.7 ± 11.6 (1–48) | EN, no/yes | 0/17 |
| *Disease duration, months | 16.7 ± 14.8 (1–48) | Riluzole, no/yes | 4/13 |
| DPI | 1.2 ± 0.9 (0–3.6) | MNA | 20.7 ± 3.7 (11–26) |
B = bulbar or S = spinal onset; BMI = body mass index; DET = diagnosis elapsed time (from disease onset); DPI = disease progression index; EDC = El Escorial diagnosis category; EN = enteral nutrition; FFM = fat free mass; ALSFRS-R = ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised; MNA = mini nutritional assessment index; NIV = non-invasive ventilation. *From the diagnosis to study start. Data are shown as mean ± SD (range).
Figure 1Correlation between exercise tolerance (O2peak) and vastus lateralis O2 extraction at peak of exercise (Δ[HHb]/Δ[HHb]isch), in pALS (black line) and CTRL (broken line, not significant). White circles: pALS at baseline (T0); white squares: pALS after 4 months (T1); grey triangles: matched healthy CTRL.
Figure 2Correlation between peak blood lactate concentration [La] and peak power at exhaustion, normalized for metabolic mass (fatty free mass, FFM), in pALS and CTRL. Four quadrants were defined by drawing dotted lines, according to one SD below the average for CTRL for both variables. White circles: pALS at baseline (T0); white squares: pALS after 4 months (T1); grey triangles: matched healthy CTRL; grey dot: pALS with vastus lateralis O2 extraction >35%. Black arrow indicates 1 patient with atypical behavior.
Figure 3Panel (A) Correlation between O2 values at exhaustion and clinical scores of ALS disease (ALSFRS-R questionnaire), recorded at baseline (T0) and after 4 months (T1). Patients with ALSFRS-R score lower than 39 (dotted line) had shorter survival time. The broken line is related only to pALS bulb. Panel (B) Correlation between O2 peak and the change in ALSFRS_R score after 4 months (T1–T0). Patients with ALSFRS-R score higher than 0.65 (dotted line) had shorter survival time. Panel (C) Correlation between Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) questionnaire scores and ALSFRS-R at T0. Patients with 16.5 < MNA < 25 had a risk of malnutrition, while patients with MNA < 16.5 were malnourished. White circles: pALS at T0; white squares: pALS at T1; black triangles: pASL with bulbar onset (pALS bulb).
Figure 4Relationships between O2 and ventilation (E) values during exercise in representative participants from the pALS (black squares) and CTRL (crosses) groups. Individually, iso-respiratory frequency (Rf) lines are indicated (pALS, continuous lines; CTRL, broken lines).
Figure 5Correlation between orthostatic lung vital capacity (FVC) and vastus lateralis O2 extraction (Δ[HHb]/Δ[HHb]isch) at exhaustion, at baseline (T0) and after 4 months (T1), in pALS. White circles: pALS at T0; white squares: pALS at T1. Black arrow indicates 1 pALS with bulbar onset who was incapable of performing fully and correctly the spirometry maneuver.
Relationship between respiratory test parameters obtained during the CPET and clinical scores in pALS.
| pALS_T0 | pALS_T1 | Regression with | only values < 81%§ | Regression with ALSFRS-R* | only values < 81%§ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FVC%-ortho | 98.1 ± 26.2 (64–137) | 98.6 ± 19.3 (69–133) | r2 = 0.02 p = 0.42 |
|
| r2 = 0.01 p = 0.69 |
| FEV1%-ortho | 99.9 ± 27.9 (65–144) | 104.3 ± 20.1 (75–138) | r2 = 0.01 p = 0.51 |
|
| r2 = 0.16 p = 0.23 |
| FVC%-clino | 84.9 ± 32.1 (24–125) | 85.7 ± 31.3 (35–132) | r2 = 0.03 p = 0.39 |
|
|
|
| FEV1%-clino | 88.0 ± 32.3 (24–129) | 89.5 ± 31.9 (37–124) | r2 = 0.02 p = 0.48 |
|
|
|
| DLCO% | 78.5 ± 9.3 (60–89) | 86.0 ± 8.4 (73–101) | r2 = 0.05 p = 0.33 | r2 = 0.51 p = 0.58 | r2 = 0.05 p = 0.34 | r2 = 0.01 p = 0.11 |
| DLCO/VA% | 101.8 ± 14.7 (66–119) | 101.2 ± 12.9 (87–117) | r2 = 0.02 p = 0.58 | N/A | r2 = 0.00 p = 0.83 | N/A |
T0, starting evaluation; T1, second evaluation after 4 months. *Since the slopes and intercepts where not significantly different at T0 and T1, it was possible to calculate one single pooled slope and intercept. §Linear regression analysis was performed again considering only spirometric or DLCO values < 81%. Statistically significant values are reported in bold. N/A, not applicable. FVC, Forced Vital Capacity; FEV1, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second, DLCO, Diffusion Lung Capacity.