Literature DB >> 28592591

Identification of High-Risk Patients After ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Comparison Between Angiographic and Magnetic Resonance Parameters.

Alessandro Durante1, Alessandra Laricchia1, Giulia Benedetti1, Antonio Esposito1, Alberto Margonato1, Ornella Rimoldi1, Francesco De Cobelli1, Antonio Colombo1, Paolo G Camici2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of angiographic no reflow (NR) and microvascular obstruction (MVO) at cardiac magnetic resonance is significantly different. The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of NR and MVO in a cohort of consecutive patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In this prospective study, 88 consecutive ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients were enrolled within 12 hours from symptoms onset. All patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance between 2 and 5 days after primary percutaneous coronary interventions. NR was defined as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade ≤2 and as myocardial blush grade <2. Presence of early or late MVO was assessed 4 and 10 to 15 minutes after gadolinium injection. Thirty-one patients (36%) had evidence of NR, whereas 58 (67%) had MVO. One NR patient did not have MVO. In contrast, NR was present in 30 of 58 MVO patients. MVO patients had higher troponin T peak (P<0.0001), larger late gadolinium enhancement area (P<0.0001), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (P<0.001) because of an increased end-systolic volume (P=0.015). In contrast, patients with NR had higher troponin T peak (P=0.006) but similar late gadolinium enhancement area (P=0.24) compared with those without NR. Major cardiovascular adverse events-free survival was worse in patients with MVO (P=0.014), although it was similar in patients with and without NR (P=0.33). The independent predictors of major cardiovascular adverse events were MVO (hazard ratio, 3.418; P=0.046) and ischemic time (hazard ratio, 1.016; P<0.001). MVO was a strong predictor of target lesion revascularization occurrence (P=0.017 for log-rank test).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with coronary angiography performed soon after recanalization of the culprit artery, cardiac magnetic resonance performed during index hospitalization provides better prognostic stratification of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary interventions. Another novel finding of our study is a significantly increased rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization in the index event culprit vessel in patients with MVO.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary angiography; gadolinium; magnetic resonance imaging; myocardial infarction; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28592591     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  9 in total

1.  Microvascular Impairment After Myocardial Infarction: It Is Not Just About Obstruction.

Authors:  Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  Advances in Coronary No-Reflow Phenomenon-a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Ahmadreza Karimianpour; Anbukarasi Maran
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  No-reflow phenomenon and comparison to the normal-flow population postprimary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction: case-control study (NORM PPCI).

Authors:  Jennifer Ann Rossington; Eirini Sol; Konstantina Masoura; Konstantinos Aznaouridis; Raj Chelliah; Michael Cunnington; Benjamin Davison; Joseph John; Richard Oliver; Angela Hoye
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-07

4.  MR findings of microvascular perfusion in infarcted and remote myocardium early after successful primary PCI.

Authors:  Anne Bethke; Limalanathan Shanmuganathan; Christian Shetelig; David Swanson; Geir Øystein Andersen; Jan Eritsland; Nils Einar Kløw; Pavel Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Role of no reflow and microvascular obstruction in the prognostic stratification of STEMI patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Durante
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.596

6.  Protective effect of Danhong injection in patients with acute myocardial infarction at a high risk of no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Qi You; Jing Wang; Wei Dong; Feng Tian; Hong-Xu Liu; Jing Jing; Yun-Dai Chen
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 7.  A fresh look at coronary microembolization.

Authors:  Petra Kleinbongard; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 49.421

8.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and no standard modifiable risk factors-A DANAMI-3 substudy.

Authors:  Jawad Mazhar; Kathrine Ekström; Rebecca Kozor; Stuart M Grieve; Lars Nepper-Christensen; Kiril A Ahtarovski; Henning Kelbæk; Dan E Høfsten; Lars Køber; Niels Vejlstrup; Stephen T Vernon; Thomas Engstrøm; Jacob Lønborg; Gemma A Figtree
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-03

9.  Post-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Platelet Reactivity Is Associated With the Extent of Microvascular Obstruction and Infarct Size as Determined by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Eias Massalha; Daniel Oren; Orly Goitein; Yafim Brodov; Alex Fardman; Anan Younis; Anat Berkovitch; Shir Raibman-Spector; Eli Konen; Elad Maor; Paul Fefer; Amit Segev; Roy Beigel; Shlomi Matetzky
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.106

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.