Literature DB >> 28592386

CT-P6 compared with reference trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer: a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 equivalence trial.

Justin Stebbing1, Yauheni Baranau2, Valeriy Baryash3, Alexey Manikhas4, Vladimir Moiseyenko5, Giorgi Dzagnidze6, Edvard Zhavrid7, Dmytro Boliukh8, Daniil Stroyakovskii9, Joanna Pikiel10, Alexandru Eniu11, Dmitry Komov12, Gabriela Morar-Bolba11, Rubi K Li13, Andriy Rusyn14, Sang Joon Lee15, Sung Young Lee15, Francisco J Esteva16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: CT-P6 is a proposed biosimilar to reference trastuzumab. In this study, we aimed to establish equivalence of CT-P6 to reference trastuzumab in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer.
METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 equivalence trial, we recruited women aged 18 years or older with stage I-IIIa operable HER2-positive breast cancer from 112 centres in 23 countries. Inclusion criteria were an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1; a normal left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 55%; adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function; at least one measureable lesion; and known oestrogen and progesterone receptor status. Exclusion criteria included bilateral breast cancer, previous breast cancer treatment, previous anthracycline treatment, and pregnancy or lactation. We randomly allocated patients 1:1 to receive neoadjuvant CT-P6 or reference trastuzumab intravenously (eight cycles, each lasting 3 weeks, for 24 weeks; 8 mg/kg on day 1 of cycle 1 and 6 mg/kg on day 1 of cycles 2-8) in conjunction with neoadjuvant docetaxel (75 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycles 1-4) and FEC (fluorouracil [500 mg/m2], epirubicin [75 mg/m2], and cyclophosphamide [500 mg/m2]; day 1 of cycles 5-8) therapy. We stratified randomisation by clinical stage, receptor status, and country and used permuted blocks. We did surgery within 3-6 weeks of the final neoadjuvant study drug dose, followed by an adjuvant treatment period of up to 1 year. We monitored long-term safety and efficacy for 3 years after the last patient was enrolled. Participants and investigators were masked to treatment until study completion. The primary efficacy endpoint, analysed in the per-protocol population, was pathological complete response, assessed via specimens obtained during surgery, analysed by masked central review of local histopathology reports. The equivalence margin was -0·15 to 0·15. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02162667, and is ongoing, but no longer recruiting.
FINDINGS: Between Aug 7, 2014, and May 6, 2016, we randomly allocated 549 patients (271 [49%] to CT-P6 vs 278 [51%] to reference trastuzumab). A similar proportion of patients achieved pathological complete response with CT-P6 (116 [46·8%; 95% CI 40·4-53·2] of 248 patients) and reference trastuzumab (129 [50·4%; 44·1-56·7] of 256 patients). The 95% CI of the estimated treatment outcome difference (-0·04% [95% CI -0·12 to 0·05]) was within the equivalence margin. 19 (7%) of 271 patients in the CT-P6 group reported serious treatment-emergent adverse events versus 22 (8%) of 278 in the reference trastuzumab group; frequent (occurring in more than one patient) serious adverse events were febrile neutropenia (four [1%] vs one [<1%]) and neutropenia (one [<1%] vs two [1%]). Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events occurred in 17 (6%) of 271 patients in the CT-P6 group versus 23 (8%) of 278 in the reference trastuzumab group; the most frequently reported adverse event was neutropenia in ten (4%) versus 14 (5%).
INTERPRETATION: CT-P6 showed equivalent efficacy to reference trastuzumab and adverse events were similar. Availability of trastuzumab biosimilars could increase access to this targeted therapy for HER2-positive early-stage cancer. FUNDING: Celltrion Inc.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28592386     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30434-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  31 in total

Review 1.  What Does the Pipeline Promise about Upcoming Biosimilar Antibodies in Oncology?

Authors:  Antonia Busse; Diana Lüftner
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Breast cancer in 2017: Spurring science, marking progress, and influencing history.

Authors:  Jose Perez-Garcia; Javier Cortes
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Are Biosimilars the Future of Oncology and Haematology?

Authors:  Pier Luigi Zinzani; Martin Dreyling; William Gradishar; Marc Andre; Francisco J Esteva; Suliman Boulos; Eva González Barca; Giuseppe Curigliano
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Biosimilar Trastuzumab in Clinical Trials: Differences or Not?

Authors:  Marc Thill
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Characteristics of Clinical Trials Evaluating Biosimilars in the Treatment of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Doni Bloomfield; Elvira D'Andrea; Sarosh Nagar; Aaron Kesselheim
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 33.006

6.  Quality of adverse event reporting in phase III randomized controlled trials of breast and colorectal cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Adam S Komorowski; Helen J MacKay; Rossanna C Pezo
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Biosimilar Trastuzumab (CT-P6) in HER2-Positive Early-Stage and Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Soong June Bae; Jee Hung Kim; Sung Gwe Ahn; Hei-Cheul Jeung; Joohyuk Sohn; Gun Min Kim; Min Hwan Kim; Seung Il Kim; Seho Park; Hyung Seok Park; Ji Ye Kim; Joon Jeong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Biosimilars.

Authors:  Miguel Martin
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2018-01-24

9.  Extrapolation concept at work with biosimilar: a decade of experience in oncology.

Authors:  Andriy Krendyukov; Martin Schiestl
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2018-02-06

10.  Evaluation of analytical similarity between trastuzumab biosimilar CT-P6 and reference product using statistical analyses.

Authors:  Jihun Lee; Hyun Ah Kang; Jin Soo Bae; Kyu Dae Kim; Kyoung Hoon Lee; Ki Jung Lim; Min Joo Choo; Shin Jae Chang
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.