| Literature DB >> 28592322 |
W Ray Waters1, H Martin Vordermeier2, Shelley Rhodes2, Bhagwati Khatri2, Mitchell V Palmer1, Mayara F Maggioli1, Tyler C Thacker1, Jeffrey T Nelson3, Bruce V Thomsen3, Suelee Robbe-Austerman3, Doris M Bravo Garcia3, Mark A Schoenbaum4, Mark S Camacho5, Jean S Ray6, Javan Esfandiari7, Paul Lambotte7, Rena Greenwald7, Adrian Grandison7, Alina Sikar-Gang7, Konstantin P Lyashchenko8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bovine tuberculosis (TB) control programs generally rely on the tuberculin skin test (TST) for ante-mortem detection of Mycobacterium bovis-infected cattle.Entities:
Keywords: Antibody; Bovine tuberculosis; Dual path platform; Multi-antigen print immunoassay; Mycobacterium bovis; Tuberculin skin test
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28592322 PMCID: PMC5463416 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-1085-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
IgG reactivity rates in tuberculin skin test reactors and non-reactors found among M. bovis-infected cattle in GB
| Animal groupa | No. of animals | Individual antigen reactivity rates in DPP assayb | DPP assay reactivity rateb (%, 95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFP10/ESAT-6 | MPB70/MPB83 | |||
|
| 75 | 12 (16%) | 43 (57.3%) | 45 (60%; 95% CI: 48,71.2) |
|
| 52 | 21 (40.4%) | 21 (40.4%) | 34 (65.4%, 95% CI: 50.9, 78) |
| Total | 127 | 33 (26%) | 64 (50.4%) | 79 (62.2%, 95% CI: 53.2, 70.6) |
| TB-free, TST Non-Reactors | 50 | 2 (4%) | 2 (4%) | 2 (4%, 95% CI: 0.5, 13.7) |
aSera obtained from animals in multiple herds and of diverse age, gender, breed and management systems
bData are presented as number (percent) positive per group for each antigen or assay
Diagnostic characterization of TST false-negative cattle identified in US herds infected with M. bovis
| State | Animal ID # | CFTa results | Postmortem examination results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul-2015 | Jan-2016 | Gross lesions | Histopathology | PCRb | Culture | ||
| TX | 755 | Pos | Neg | Present | TB compatiblec, IS6110 Posd | Neg | Neg |
| 272 | Pos | Neg | Present | TB compatible | Pos | NDe | |
| 976 | Neg | Neg | Present | TB compatible | Pos | ND | |
| 857 | Pos | Neg | Present | TB compatible | Pos | ND | |
| 676 | Pos | Neg | Present | TB compatible | Pos | ND | |
| 889 | Pos | Neg | Present | TB compatible | Pos | ND | |
| 352 | Neg | Neg | Present | TB compatible | Pos | ND | |
| MIf | Sep-2015 | Jan-2016 | |||||
| 855 | Neg | Neg | Present | TB compatible | ND |
| |
| 370 | Neg | Neg | Present | TB compatible | ND |
| |
| 364 | Neg | Neg | Present | Not compatible | ND |
| |
| May-2015 | Oct-2015 | ||||||
| 809 | Neg | Neg | Present | TB compatible | ND |
| |
aCFT, caudal fold test (i.e., intradermal M. bovis PPD injected into the caudal skin fold and response determined by palpation 72 h after injection) was applied <3 wks prior to collection of serum
bPCR, polymerase chain reaction for either M. tb complex IS6110 or 1081 DNA on fresh tissue
cMicroscopic granulomatous lesions consistent with bovine TB and containing acid-fast bacilli
dIS6110 DNA by polymerase chain reaction on formalin-fixed tissue
eND, not done
fAnimals # 855, 370, and 364 were from a beef herd while #809 was from a dairy herd
Quantitative measure of IgM and IgG responses produced by TST false-negative cattle in the US
| Animal ID # | Reactivity in the DPP assaya | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFP10/ESAT-6 | MPB70/MPB83 | |||
| IgM | IgG | IgM | IgG | |
| 755 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 |
|
| 272 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
| 976 | 0 |
| 0.75 |
|
| 857 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 |
| 676 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
| 889 | 0 |
| 0 |
|
| 352 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 |
|
| 855 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 370 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
| 364 | 0 | 0.50 |
|
|
| 809 | 0 |
| 0.55 |
|
aData are presented as signal-to-cutoff ratios with ≥1.00 considered as antibody reactive results (shown in bold)
Fig. 1MAPIA testing of TST non-reactive cattle diagnosed with M. bovis infection in the US. Assay was performed as described in Methods. Antigens printed onto nitrocellulose membrane are shown on the right. Results are presented for sera from a negative control (on the left), 7 animals from TX, and 4 animals from MI. Animal ID numbers are shown on the bottom (see Table 2 for diagnostic characterization). Visible bands on the strips indicate the presence of IgG to corresponding antigen(s). Intensity of the bands generally correlates with the antibody level