| Literature DB >> 28591867 |
Gabor G Kovacs1, Sharon X Xie1, Edward B Lee1, John L Robinson1, Carrie Caswell1, David J Irwin1, Jon B Toledo1, Victoria E Johnson1, Douglas H Smith1, Irina Alafuzoff1, Johannes Attems1, Janos Bencze1, Kevin F Bieniek1, Eileen H Bigio1, Istvan Bodi1, Herbert Budka1, Dennis W Dickson1, Brittany N Dugger1, Charles Duyckaerts1, Isidro Ferrer1, Shelley L Forrest1, Ellen Gelpi1, Stephen M Gentleman1, Giorgio Giaccone1, Lea T Grinberg1, Glenda M Halliday1, Kimmo J Hatanpaa1, Patrick R Hof1, Monika Hofer1, Tibor Hortobágyi1, James W Ironside1, Andrew King1, Julia Kofler1, Enikö Kövari1, Jillian J Kril1, Seth Love1, Ian R Mackenzie1, Qinwen Mao1, Radoslav Matej1, Catriona McLean1, David G Munoz1, Melissa E Murray1, Janna Neltner1, Peter T Nelson1, Diane Ritchie1, Roberta D Rodriguez1, Zdenek Rohan1, Annemieke Rozemuller1, Kenji Sakai1, Christian Schultz1, Danielle Seilhean1, Vanessa Smith1, Pawel Tacik1, Hitoshi Takahashi1, Masaki Takao1, Dietmar Rudolf Thal1, Serge Weis1, Stephen B Wharton1, Charles L White1, John M Woulfe1, Masahito Yamada1, John Q Trojanowski1.
Abstract
Aging-related tau astrogliopathy (ARTAG) is a recently introduced terminology. To facilitate the consistent identification of ARTAG and to distinguish it from astroglial tau pathologies observed in the primary frontotemporal lobar degeneration tauopathies we evaluated how consistently neuropathologists recognize (1) different astroglial tau immunoreactivities, including those of ARTAG and those associated with primary tauopathies (Study 1); (2) ARTAG types (Study 2A); and (3) ARTAG severity (Study 2B). Microphotographs and scanned sections immunostained for phosphorylated tau (AT8) were made available for download and preview. Percentage of agreement and kappa values with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for each evaluation. The overall agreement for Study 1 was >60% with a kappa value of 0.55 (95% CI 0.433-0.645). Moderate agreement (>90%, kappa 0.48, 95% CI 0.457-0.900) was reached in Study 2A for the identification of ARTAG pathology for each ARTAG subtype (kappa 0.37-0.72), whereas fair agreement (kappa 0.40, 95% CI 0.341-0.445) was reached for the evaluation of ARTAG severity. The overall assessment of ARTAG showed moderate agreement (kappa 0.60, 95% CI 0.534-0.653) among raters. Our study supports the application of the current harmonized evaluation strategy for ARTAG with a slight modification of the evaluation of its severity.Entities:
Keywords: ARTAG; Aging; Digital pathology; Interrater agreement; Neuropathology; Tau; Tau-astrogliopathy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28591867 PMCID: PMC6251511 DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nlx041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol ISSN: 0022-3069 Impact factor: 3.685