Literature DB >> 28591861

DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS IN CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Ali B Alhailiy1,2, Patrick C Brennan1, Mark F McEntee1, Peter L Kench1, Elaine A Ryan1.   

Abstract

Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a commonly used diagnostic tool for cardiovascular disease. Despite constant improvements to imaging technologies, the radiation dose to patients from CCTA remains a concern when using this procedure. There remains a need for optimisation of CCTA procedures and accurate dose monitoring to reduce the potential risk of cancer. Establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) allows for the assessment of radiation dose variations, enabling strategies aimed at standardising doses across radiological centres. This systematic review explores the literature on CCTA methodologies that have been used to establish DRLs. A search was carried out using the Web of Science, SCOPUS, Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE databases. Reference lists of published articles were also assessed to identify further articles. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was employed to evaluate articles for relevance. Articles were included if they assessed DRLs in CCTA. The search resulted in 448 articles, of which, six were included after a thorough screening process. The literature demonstrates a wide dose variation in reported CCTA DRLs ranging from 671 to 1510 mGy cm in DLP. Where reported, CTDIvol DRLs ranged from 26 to 70 mGy. Differences were found in the methodologies used for establishing CCTA DRLs, including the sampling methodology used for identifying suitable patients and scanning protocols. This current review emphasises the need for an international standardisation for DRLs establishment methods, to provide a more comparable global measurement of dose variations across CT sites.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28591861     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  4 in total

1.  The associated factors for radiation dose variation in cardiac CT angiography.

Authors:  Ali B Alhailiy; Ernest U Ekpo; Peter L Kench; Elaine A Ryan; Patrick C Brennan; Mark McEntee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Coronary flow quantification estimated by dynamic 320-detector CT angiography: validation by 13N ammonia PET myocardial flow reserve.

Authors:  Yuka Matsuo; Michinobu Nagao; Atsushi Yamamoto; Kiyoe Ando; Risako Nakao; Kenji Fukushima; Mitsuru Momose; Akiko Sakai; Kayoko Sato; Shuji Sakai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Towards establishment of diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indication in the state of Qatar.

Authors:  Huda AlNaemi; Virginia Tsapaki; Ahmed J Omar; Maryam AlKuwari; Amal AlObadli; Shady Alkhazzam; Antar Aly; Mohammad Hassan Kharita
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2020-10-28

4.  In vitro optimization and comparison of CT angiography versus radial cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the quantification of cross-sectional areas and coronary endothelial function.

Authors:  Jérôme Yerly; Fabio Becce; Ruud B van Heeswijk; Francis R Verdun; Danilo Gubian; Reto Meuli; Matthias Stuber
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 5.364

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.