Literature DB >> 28591771

The use of Twitter to facilitate sharing of clinical expertise in urology.

Kevan M Sternberg1, Stacy L Loeb2, David Canes3, Laura Donnelly4, Mitchell H Tsai5.   

Abstract

The use of social media in the urologic community is common and increasing. Although the potential benefits of platforms like Twitter have been described in the literature, the use of social media in the clinical context of Urology has not been explored.In this case report, we describe how we used Twitter to share ideas about the clinical management of a complex urologic patient. By posting a clinical scenario, a timely discussion was generated with global participation and expert suggestions. This knowledge was applied to the surgical management of a patient with positive clinical outcomes.The ability of Twitter to facilitate rapid communication with a wide network of contributors makes it a potentially useful tool for clinical decision making. Care must be taken to ensure patient confidentiality and caution used appropriately when evaluating the sources and content of the clinical information shared.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association.All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Social media; crowdsourcing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28591771      PMCID: PMC7647134          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocx055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  9 in total

1.  Social media makes global urology meetings truly global. : The influence of Twitter.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Integrating Social Media into Urologic Health care: What Can We Learn from Other Disciplines?

Authors:  Johannes Salem; Hendrik Borgmann; Declan G Murphy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  European Association of Urology (@Uroweb) recommendations on the appropriate use of social media.

Authors:  Morgan Rouprêt; Todd M Morgan; Peter J Bostrom; Matthew R Cooperberg; Alexander Kutikov; Kate D Linton; Joan Palou; Luis Martínez-Piñeiro; Henk van der Poel; Carl Wijburg; Andrew Winterbottom; Henry H Woo; Manfred P Wirth; James W F Catto
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Translating evidence to practice in the health professions: a randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook.

Authors:  Jacqueline Tunnecliff; John Weiner; James E Gaida; Jennifer L Keating; Prue Morgan; Dragan Ilic; Lyn Clearihan; David Davies; Sivalal Sadasivan; Patitapaban Mohanty; Shankar Ganesh; John Reynolds; Stephen Maloney
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Qualitative Twitter analysis of participants, tweet strategies, and tweet content at a major urologic conference.

Authors:  Hendrik Borgmann; Jan-Henning Woelm; Axel Merseburger; Tim Nestler; Johannes Salem; Maximilian P Brandt; Axel Haferkamp; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: 12-month experience.

Authors:  Isaac A Thangasamy; Michael Leveridge; Benjamin J Davies; Antonio Finelli; Brian Stork; Henry H Woo
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Activity, content, contributors, and influencers of the twitter discussion on urologic oncology.

Authors:  Hendrik Borgmann; Stacy Loeb; Johannes Salem; Christian Thomas; Axel Haferkamp; Declan G Murphy; Igor Tsaur
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.498

8.  Engaging responsibly with social media: the BJUI guidelines.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Stacy Loeb; Marnique Y Basto; Benjamin Challacombe; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Mike Leveridge; Todd Morgan; Prokar Dasgupta; Matthew Bultitude
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  The acceptability among health researchers and clinicians of social media to translate research evidence to clinical practice: mixed-methods survey and interview study.

Authors:  Jacqueline Tunnecliff; Dragan Ilic; Prue Morgan; Jennifer Keating; James E Gaida; Lynette Clearihan; Sivalal Sadasivan; David Davies; Shankar Ganesh; Patitapaban Mohanty; John Weiner; John Reynolds; Stephen Maloney
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Thulium fiber laser pre-settings during ureterorenoscopy: Twitter's experts' recommendations.

Authors:  Alba Sierra; Mariela Corrales; Adrià Piñero; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The good in social media.

Authors: 
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2022-10-19

3.  Collective intelligence in medical decision-making: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Kate Radcliffe; Helena C Lyson; Jill Barr-Walker; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Association of Social Media Presence with Online Physician Ratings and Surgical Volume Among California Urologists: Observational Study.

Authors:  Justin Houman; James Weinberger; Ashley Caron; Alex Hannemann; Michael Zaliznyak; Devin Patel; Ariel Moradzadeh; Timothy J Daskivich
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.