| Literature DB >> 28591379 |
N F Correa-Netto1, M Y Masukawa1, F Nishide1, G S Galfano1, F Tamura1, M K Shimizo1, M P Marcato1, J G Santos1, A Linardi1.
Abstract
Ayahuasca is a beverage obtained from decoctions of the Banisteriopsis caapi plus Psychotria viridis. In religious contexts, ayahuasca is used by different age groups. However, little is known of the effects of ayahuasca during ontogenic development, particularly with regard to the functional characteristics of the central nervous system. Animal models are useful for studying the ontogenic effects of ayahuasca because they allow exclusion of the behavioral influence associated with the ritualistic use. We investigated the effects of exposure to ayahuasca (1.5 mL/kg, orally, twice a week) on memory and anxiety in C57BL/6 mice, with the post-natal day (PND) being used as the ontogenic criterion for classification: childhood (PND21 to PND35), adolescence (PND35 to PND63), adulthood (PND90-PND118), childhood-adolescence (PND21 to PND63), childhood-adulthood (PND21 to PND118) and adolescence-adulthood (PND35 to PND118). One day after the last ayahuasca exposure, the mice were subjected to the Morris water maze (MWM), open field and elevated plus maze tasks (EPM). Ayahuasca did not affect locomotion in the open field or open arms exploration in the EPM, but increased the risk assessment behavior in the childhood group. Ayahuasca did not cause any change in acquisition of spatial reference memory in the MWM task, but decreased the time spent on the platform quadrant during the test session in the adolescence group. These results suggest that, in mice, exposure to ayahuasca in childhood and adolescence promoted anxiety and memory impairment, respectively. However, these behavioral changes were not long-lasting since they were not observed in the childhood-adulthood and adolescence-adulthood groups.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28591379 PMCID: PMC5463532 DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X20176036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res ISSN: 0100-879X Impact factor: 2.590
Experimental groups.
| Group (n=8-12) | Treatment period | Total number of ayahuasca or water administrations |
|---|---|---|
| Aya-Child or Cont-Child | PND21-PND35 | 4 |
| Aya-Adol or Cont-Adol | PND35-PND62 | 8 |
| Aya-Adul or Cont-Adult | PND90-PND118 | 8 |
| Aya-Child-Adol or Cont-Child-Adol | PND21-PND62 | 10 |
| Aya-Child-Adult or Cont-Child-Adult | PND21-PND118 | 28 |
| Aya-Adol-Adult or Cont-Adol-Adult | PND35-PND118 | 24 |
Mice received ayahuasca or water (1.5 mL/kg each, orally) twice a week. The post-natal day (PND) was used as the ontogenic parameter. Child: childhood; Adol: adolescence; Aya: mice treated with ayahuasca; Cont: mice treated with water.
Figure 1.Locomotor activity of mice in the open field test. Control mice received water whereas treated mice received ayahuasca (1.5 mL/kg, orally, for treatment and control) in the different periods of development. Locomotor activity was monitored for 5 min. Data are reported as the mean±SE (n=8-12/group).
Figure 2.Open arms exploration (percentage of entries and of time spent in open arms) in the elevated plus maze (EPM) test. Control mice received water whereas treated mice received ayahuasca (1.5 mL/kg, orally, in both cases) in the different periods of development. Locomotor activity was monitored for 5 min. Data are reported as the mean±SE (n=8-12/group).
Figure 3.Time spent by mice in risk assessment behavior in the elevated plus maze (EPM) test. Control mice received water whereas treated mice received ayahuasca (1.5 mL/kg, orally, in both cases) in the different periods of development. Data are reported as the mean±SE (n=8-12/group). **P<0.01 compared to the respective control group (Student's unpaired t-test).
Figure 4.Mean latency during the acquisition phase of the Morris water maze (MWM) test. The latency to find the hidden platform was measured during 5 days of the acquisition phase. Control mice received water whereas treated mice received ayahuasca (1.5 mL/kg, orally, in both cases) in the different periods of development. Data are reported as the mean±SE (n=8-12/group). One way ANOVA for repeated measures and Newman Keuls post hoc.
Statistical analysis of spatial reference memory acquisition in the MWM test.
| Group | Time effect | Treatment effect | Time × treatment interaction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Child | Yes [F(4,76)=24.4810; P=0.0011] | No [F(1,19)=0.1061; P=0.7842] | Yes [F(4,76)=2.5764; P=0.0441] |
| Adol | Yes [F(4,80)=12.4341; P=0.0012] | Yes [F(1,20)=7.1250; P=0.0147] | No [F(4,80)=0.7733; P=0.5458] |
| Adult | Yes [F(4,84)=24.4101; P=0.0013] | No [F(1,21)=0.0606; P=0.8079] | No [F(4,84)=0.2443; P=0.9124] |
| Child-Adol | Yes [F(4,60)=33.4881; P=0.0015] | No [F(1,15)=0.0805; P=0.7805] | Yes [F(4,60)=6.1132; P=0.0012] |
| Child-Adult | Yes [F(4,56)=20.8271; P=0.0013] | No [F(1,14)=0.0066; P=0.9365] | No [F(4,56)=0.3225; P=0.8617] |
| Adol-Adult | Yes [F(4,68)=29.9341; P=0.0012] | Yes [F(1,17)=4.5188; P=0.0485] | Yes [F(4,68)=3.2988; P=0.0157] |
One-way ANOVA for repeated measures was used to analyze the acquisition phase of the Morris water maze (MWM) test (latency in finding the hidden platform during the 5 days). The Newman-Keuls post-hoc test was used when ANOVA detected significant differences among experimental groups. Child: childhood; Adol: adolescence.
Figure 5.Time spent in the platform quadrant during the probe trial session. Control mice received water whereas treated mice received ayahuasca (1.5 mL/kg, orally, in both cases) in the different periods of development. Data are reported as the mean±SE (n=8-12/group). *P<0.05 compared to the corresponding control group (Student's unpaired t-test).
Figure 6.Number of times the platform zone was crossed during the probe trial session. Control mice received water whereas treated mice received ayahuasca (1.5 mL/kg, orally, in both cases) in the different periods of development. Data are reported as the mean±SE (n=8-12/group). *P<0.05 compared to the corresponding control group (Student's unpaired t-test).