Literature DB >> 28591236

Predictors of success for mandibular repositioning appliance in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Thays Crosara Abrahão Cunha1, Thais de Moura Guimarães2, Teresa Cristina Barros Schultz2, Fernanda Ribeiro de Almeida3, Thulio Marquez Cunha4, Paulo Cezar Simamoto1, Lia Rita Azeredo Bittencourt2.   

Abstract

The characteristics of non-obese patients with mild to moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) who will present with a good response to Mandibular Repositioning Appliance (MRA) treatment have not yet been well established in the literature. The aim of this study is to assess whether polysomnographic (PSG), demographic, anthropometric, cephalometric, and otorhinolaryngological parameters predict MRA success in the treatment of OSAS. Forty (40) males with mild and moderate OSAS were assessed pretreatment and 2-months post-treatment after wearing an MRA. Demographic, anthropometric, otorhinolaryngological (ENT), cephalometric, and polysomnographic parameters, including continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titrated pressure, dental models, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, quality of life (Short Form SF-36), and mood state (Profile of Mood States - POMS), were assessed. The responders exhibited fewer oropharyngeal alterations, increased upper pharyngeal space, reduced lower airway space, and increased mandibular intercanine width, and they had milder disease. Nevertheless, no predictive factors of MRA success could be found. MRA was more successful among men with a more pervious airway, a larger interdental width and milder OSAS. However, a combined [1] functional and structural assessment is needed to successfully predict the [2] effectiveness of MRA treatment of OSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28591236     DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  5 in total

1.  Jaw thrust versus the use of a boil-and-bite mandibular advancement device as a screening tool during drug-induced sleep endoscopy.

Authors:  Patty E Vonk; Julia A M Uniken Venema; Aarnoud Hoekema; Madeline J L Ravesloot; Johanna A van de Velde-Muusers; Nico de Vries
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Equal effect of a noncustom vs a custom mandibular advancement device in treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Pien F N Bosschieter; Julia A M Uniken Venema; Patty E Vonk; Madeline J L Ravesloot; Aarnoud Hoekema; Joanneke M Plooij; Frank Lobbezoo; Nico de Vries
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.324

3.  The impact of oral appliance therapy with moderate mandibular advancement on obstructive sleep apnea and upper airway volume.

Authors:  Riitta Pahkala; J Seppä; R Myllykangas; J Tervaniemi; V M Vartiainen; A L Suominen; A Muraja-Murro
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Effectiveness of a Uniquely Designed Oral Appliance on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Control: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Denise Fernandes Barbosa; Miguel Meira E Cruz; Marcelo Corrêa Alves; Edilson Zancanella; Fausto Berzin; Almiro José Machado Júnior
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2022-02-18

5.  Severe obstructive sleep apnea treatment with mandibular advancement device: A case report.

Authors:  Maria de Lourdes Rabelo Guimarães; Ana Paula Hermont; Thais Moura Guimarães; Cibele Dal-Fabbro; Lia Bittencourt; Cauby Maia Chaves Junior
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.