Iara Maluf Tomazella1, Vanessa Veltrini Abril2, José Maurício Barbanti Duarte1. 1. Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Câmpus Jaboticabal, Departamento de Zootecnia, Núcleo de Pesquisa e Conservação de Cervídeos (NUPECCE), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. 2. Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Campus Universitário do Araguaia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde (ICBS), Pontal do Araguaia, MT, Brazil.
Abstract
The process of karyotype evolution in Cervidae from a common ancestor (2n = 70, FN = 70) has been marked by complex chromosomal rearrangements. This ancestral karyotype has been retained by the current species Mazama gouazoubira (Fischer 1814), for which a chromosomal polymorphism (Robertsonian translocations and the presence of B chromosomes) has been described, presumably caused by a chromosome fragility. Thus, this study has identified doxorubicin-induced chromosome aberrations and mapped the regions involved in breaks, which may be related to the chromosome evolution process. G-banding pattern showed that 21 pairs of chromosomes presented chromosomal aberrations, 60% of the total chromosome number of the species M. gouazoubira. Among chromosomes that carry aberrations, the region where they were most frequently concentrated was distal relative to the centromere. These data suggest that certain chromosomal regions may be more susceptible to chromosome fragility and consequently could be involved in karyotype differentiation in species of the family Cervidae.
The process of karyotype evolution in Cervidae from a common ancestor (2n = 70, FN = 70) has been marked by complex chromosomal rearrangements. This ancestral karyotype has been retained by the current species Mazama gouazoubira (Fischer 1814), for which a chromosomal polymorphism (Robertsonian translocations and the presence of B chromosomes) has been described, presumably caused by a chromosome fragility. Thus, this study has identified doxorubicin-induced chromosome aberrations and mapped the regions involved in breaks, which may be related to the chromosome evolution process. G-banding pattern showed that 21 pairs of chromosomes presented chromosomal aberrations, 60% of the total chromosome number of the species M. gouazoubira. Among chromosomes that carry aberrations, the region where they were most frequently concentrated was distal relative to the centromere. These data suggest that certain chromosomal regions may be more susceptible to chromosome fragility and consequently could be involved in karyotype differentiation in species of the family Cervidae.
The genus Mazama (Rafinesque 1817) belongs to family Cervidae and order
Artiodactyla, and consists of ten species with broad morphological and cytogenetic
diversity, especially the latter (Duarte and Merino,
1997; Duarte and Jorge, 2003; Abril ; Merino and Rossi, 2010). Deer are used as a model
for studies on chromosome evolution and speciation, in particular, two genera:
Muntiacus (Rafinesque 1815) with 2n ranging from 6-7 to 46; and
Mazama between 32 and 70 chromosomes (Neitzel, 1987; Yang ; Abril ). The extensive chromosomal diversification presented by
species of Mazama can be understood by analysing the karyotype
evolution that occurred in this genus, which underwent complex interspecific
rearrangements (Fontana and Rubini, 1990). This
karyotypic variation can be explained by the hypothesis of chromosome fragility proposed
by Duarte and Jorge (1996) and corroborated by
Vargas-Munar ,
who observed that the chromosomes of the genus Mazama are more unstable
than chromosomes of the species Blastocerus dichotomus (Illiger 1815).
Moreover, it has been observed that Mazama gouazoubira (Fischer 1814)
has the highest rates of chromosomal aberrations induced by doxorubicin among the three
species of the genus Mazama that have been analysed: Mazama
americana (Erxleben 1777), M. gouazoubira and
Mazama nana (Hensel 1872).The brown brocket deer M. gouazoubira is a small to medium-sized deer
and its coat varies in colour from brown to grey (Black-Décima ). In Brazil, the brown brocket
deer can be found in all regions except the Amazon region, showing great ecological
plasticity, which is related to the occurrence of important morphological and genetic
modifications (Pinder and Leeuwenberg, 1997;
Rodrigues ). The
species is characterised by its retention of the ancestral karyotype of Cervidae (2n =
70, FN = 70) with 68 acrocentric autosomal chromosomes, an acrocentric X chromosome and
a metacentric Y chromosome (Neitzel, 1987; Fontana and Rubini, 1990). In this species,
chromosomal polymorphism is often observed, caused by the presence of B chromosomes and
the occurrence of Robertsonian translocations, which could be related to chromosome
fragility in this species (Vargas-Munar ). Chromosome fragility facilitates the occurrence of
chromosome breaks and exchanges, which can induce the formation of new species following
geographic isolation over a short period of time (Glover
and Stein, 1988).Doxorubicin, also known as Adriamycin, is a substance belonging to the class of drugs
called anthracyclines, which are used in chemotherapy and can be used as a mutagenic
agent in studies on mutagenicity (Tan ; Blum and Carter,
1979; Young ; Resende ). In addition to producing highly toxic free radicals, doxorubicin cause
random breaks in DNA through the inhibition of topoisomerase II and helicase activity,
interfering in the separation of double-stranded DNA (Kitada ; Coquelle
; Quiles
; Islaih
). Reactive free radicals are considered to be
mediators of the toxicity induced by doxorubicin, which is characterised by changes in
morphology and mitochondrial function (Bachmann
; Porta
). The oxidative process caused by free
radicals induces DNA damage and can be repaired by the system of cell repair; however,
if repair does not occur, oxidative damage results in certain pathophysiological
processes, such as mutagenesis, carcinogenesis and cell aging (Dizdaroglu ; Halliwell and Gutteridge, 2015). When the damage caused by
doxorubicin to DNA is not repaired it accumulates, resulting in mutational events and
chromosomal aberrations (CAs), in both healthy and tumour cells (Islaih ). It has been suggested that
the mutagenicity of doxorubicin could be the result of damage caused by catalysing NADH
dehydrogenase in close proximity to DNA (Akman ).Since the species M. gouazoubira retains the ancestral karyotype (Neitzel, 1987; Fontana and Rubini, 1990), is the basis for the formation of karyotypes of
other deer species and has shown high rates of CAs when its cells are submitted to
doxorubicin (Vargas-Munar ), it was chosen as the object of this study. Identifying chromosomes with
high rates of CAs could indicate which chromosomes are involved in the chromosomal
changes that have occurred during the karyotype evolution of deer. Thus, this study
aimed to identify chromosomes with chromosomal aberrations and map regions of breaks
induced by doxorubicin in chromosomes of M. gouazoubira by analysing
the frequency and the different types of breaks that occurred in each chromosome.
Materials and Methods
Blood samples were collected from six deer (three females: F1, F2 and F3; three males:
M1, M2 and M3) maintained in captivity by the Deer Research and Conservation Centre
(NUPECCE) of the Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary
Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. Lymphocyte
cultures were established using these blood samples (Moorhead ): control cell cultures (CC), and
doxorubicin-treated cell cultures (TC). To induce CAs, doxorubicin hydrochloride
(Adriblastina® Pharmacia) at a concentration of 0.25 μg/mL was added to the final 24 h
of culture (Antunes and Takahashi, 1998). The CC
and TC of each deer sample were performed in triplicate.Data analysis was performed in three stages: 1) calculation of the mitotic index (MI):
this was determined by the ratio between the number of metaphases identified in 2,000
cells per culture, analysing 6,000 cells per deer (Galloway ; Takahashi, 2003); 2) analysis of chromosomal aberrations by conventional
Giemsa staining: the number of CAs (NCAs) and the number of metaphases shown by the CAs
(NMCAs) were assessed. In both analyses, the values obtained for the CC were compared
with the values obtained for the TC. Next, the CAs were identified and quantified as:
ring, dicentric chromosome, chromatid gap, chromosome gap, chromatid break, chromosome
break, triradial form, quadriradial form and rearrangement (Evans and O'Riordan, 1975; Savage,
1975; Savage and Simpson, 1994); 3)
identification and mapping of chromosomal regions by G-banding and calculation of the
percentage of chromosomes with CAs: for each deer sample, the metaphases of the TC
submitted to the G-banding technique were analysed (Seabright, 1971, with modifications), and in each metaphase, the number of
chromosomes and which pairs carried CAs was ascertained, in order to determine the NCAs
and NMCAs. The chromosomal biometrics of all the deer were used to calculate the mean
percentage of chromosomes that carried CAs. After identifying chromosomes with CAs, the
regions where breaks occurred were mapped on each of these chromosomes. To achieve this,
the chromosomes were divided into three regions in relation to the centromere: proximal,
medial and distal. In this step, the idiogram proposed by Neitzel (1987) was used for comparison. Then, a nonparametric Chi
square test (χ2) was performed at a significance level of 0.05 (α = 5%) to determine
whether the distribution of CAs observed on the chromosomes was random or organised. In
steps one and two, the mean values of the three replicates were evaluated statistically
by analysis of variance for completely randomised experiments, for each deer sample,
using the Tukey test (p < 0.05). The statistical analyses were performed in GRAPHPAD
PRISM 7.0 software.
Results
Mitotic index
No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) in values were observed for
the mitotic index (MI) between the doxorubicin-treated cell cultures (TC) and control
cell cultures (CC). This indicates the absence of cytotoxicity under the experimental
conditions of the cultures using different deer samples. No significant difference (p
> 0.05) was observed between the mean MI values of all male and female cell
cultures, indicating that the sex of the deer did not influence the MI.
Chromosome aberrations by conventional Giemsa staining
Regarding the NCAs and NMCAs, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05)
was observed between the CC and TC, such that TC showed a significant increase in
NCAs and NMCAs for both male and female deer samples. No significant differences (p
> 0.05) were observed in the NCAs and NMCAs between male and female samples in the
CC or the TC, indicating sex had no influence on CAs or MCAs (Table 1). Regarding the CC, the most frequent types of CAs
observed were chromatid break and chromatid gap followed by dicentric chromosome,
rearrangement, ring, chromosome break, chromosome gap and triradial form, on both
male and female deer chromosomes. In the TC, the most frequent types of CAs were
chromatid break and chromatid gap, followed by dicentric chromosome, chromosome
break, chromosome gap, rearrangement, ring and triradial form, on both male and
female deer chromosomes. Quadriradial forms were not detected in any of the
lymphocyte cultures analysed (Figure 1). Figure 2 presents some of the CAs detected in
metaphases of the TC. using Giemsa stain.
Table 1
Percentage of the number of chromosomal aberrations (NCAs) and the number
of metaphases carrying chromosomal aberrations (NMCAs) in control cell cultures
(CC) and doxorubicin-treated cell cultures (TC). Female (F1, F2 and F3), male
(M1, M2 and M3).
Deer
NCAs
(%)
NMCAs (%)
CC
TC
CC
TC
F1
15.57
20.57
17.20
19.14
F2
15.57
20.04
15.92
19.51
F3
16.98
15.68
17.20
15.38
M1
17.45
15.99
16.56
16.51
M2
17.92
14.18
17.83
15.20
M3
16.51
13.54
15.29
14.26
100 metaphases per cell culture were analysed totalling 300 metaphases per
deer.
Figure 1
Mean frequency of the types of chromosomal aberrations (CAs) analysed in
control cell cultures (CC, black bars) and doxorubicin-treated cell cultures
(TC, white bars) for female and male deer, in each experiment. Types of
chromosomal aberrations: ring (Ri), dicentric (Dic), chromatid gap (Gct),
chromosome gap (Gcr), chromatid break (Bct), chromosome break (Bcr), triradial
form (Ft), quadriradial form (Fq) and rearrangement (Re).
Figure 2
Different types of chromosomal aberrations obtained in doxorubicin-treated
cell cultures. (A) 1 = ring; (B) 1 and 2 = chromatid gap, 3, 4 and 5 =
chromatid break; (C) 1 = chromatid break, 2 = chromatid gap, 3 = rearrangement
and 4 = chromosome gap; (D) 1 = chromosome break, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8 = chromatid
gap, 4 = chromosome gap and 7 = triradial form; (E) 1, 2 and 3 = chromosome
gap; (F) 1 = chromatid break and 2 = chromosome break. Chromosome preparations
were stained with Giemsa and visualised at 1000x magnification. (*) Details of
some chromosomal aberrations are shown at higher magnification.
100 metaphases per cell culture were analysed totalling 300 metaphases per
deer.
Identification and mapping of chromosomal regions by G-banding and calculation of
the percentage of chromosomes with CAs
CAs were not detected on chromosome pairs 12, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31,
32, 33, 34 or the Y sex chromosome for all the samples analysed. Among all the deer
samples analysed, chromosome pair 7 showed the highest frequency of CAs (15.18%),
followed by the pairs X (12.42%), 2 (12.19%), 1 (11.04%), 4 (9.66%), 16 (9.20%), 6
(8.74%), 15 (6.67%), 5 (4.60%), 8 (2.53%), 9 (2.30%), 11 (1.38%), 17 (0.92%), 13 and
23 (0.69%), 14 and 25 (0.46%), 3, 10, 20 and 26 (0.23%) (Figure 3). Mapping of the regions where the breaks occurred showed
that the distal chromosomal region (relative to the centromere) presented the highest
frequency of CAs induced by doxorubicin compared with the proximal and medial
regions.
Figure 3
Idiogram of the G-banding pattern of Mazama gouazoubira
chromosomes, indicating the location and frequency of chromosomal aberrations
induced by doxorubicin in each pair and each chromosomal region. Idiogram
proposed by Neitzel (1987), with
modifications.
The Chi square test (Table 2) showed that
chromosome pairs 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 15, 16 and the X sex chromosomes carried higher than
statistically expected CAs, indicating that the CAs on these chromosomes did not
occur at random. This finding suggests the presence of chromosomal instability
resulting from the chromosome fragility previously described in this species. In
contrast, the CAs detected on chromosome pairs 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 20,
23, 25 and 26 showed no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05),
indicating that the quantity of CAs on these chromosomes is within expected
values.
Table 2
Values of the probability of each chromosome pair carrying chromosomal
aberrations.
Chromosome pairs
Expected value (%)
Observed value (%)
calculated χ2
1
4.28
11.04
10.67
2
3.94
12.19
17.27
3
3.74
0.23
3.29
4
3.60
9.66
10.20
5
3.50
4.60
0.34
6
3.42
8.74
8.27
7
3.34
15.18
41.97
8
3.28
2.53
0.17
9
3.24
2.30
0.27
10
3.16
0.23
2.71
11
3.08
1.38
0.93
12
3.01
0
3.01
13
2.97
0.69
1.75
14
2.93
0.46
2.08
15
2.87
6.67
5.03
16
2.83
9.20
14.33
17
2.79
0.92
1.25
18
2.71
0
2.71
19
2.66
0
2.66
20
2.60
0.23
2.16
21
2.56
0
2.56
22
2.52
0
2.52
23
2.47
0.69
1.28
24
2.44
0
2.44
25
2.40
0.46
1.56
26
2.35
0.23
1.91
27
2.30
0
2.30
28
2.23
0
2.23
29
2.19
0
2.19
30
2.12
0
2.12
31
2.02
0
2.02
32
1.97
0
1.97
33
1.89
0
1.89
34
1.64
0
1.64
X
4.95
12.42
11.27
Tabulated Chi square (χ2) = 3.84; significance level of 0.05 (α =
5%).
Tabulated Chi square (χ2) = 3.84; significance level of 0.05 (α =
5%).Twenty-one pairs of chromosomes carried CAs; 60% of the chromosome number of the
species M. gouazoubira. Analysis of the data showed that the CAs
were most frequently concentrated in certain regions of specific chromosomes,
indicating that the CAs are not randomly distributed.
Discussion
Since the species M. gouazoubira has retained the ancestral karyotype
of Cervidae, the basis for the origin of karyotypes of other species, this study used
this species to identify the chromosomes and chromosomal regions carrying CAs induced by
doxorubicin, and analysed the frequency and different types of CAs observed on its
chromosomes. The identification of chromosomes that carry CAs is an advance in the study
of chromosome evolution in cervids, enabling researchers to correlate these chromosomes
with karyotypic rearrangements that have occurred during the process of speciation in
the family Cervidae.Doxorubicin, the mutagenic agent used to induce the CAs in this study, works through
different mechanisms, all of which cause cell damage. Chromosome damage caused by this
mutagen occurs during certain phases of the cell cycle and is the result of doxorubicin
binding strongly to DNA during the replication process. This strong binding is due to
the intercalation of doxorubicin between pairs of DNA bases, forming a stable complex
which prevents the fixation and, consequently, the activity of DNA polymerase (DiMarco ; Gale ). The different
types of CAs analysed in this study were probably induced by the formation of such
stable complexes. Another mechanism of action of doxorubicin is its production of highly
reactive free radicals, which cause changes in the nitrogenous bases of DNA (Lown, 1983; Akman
). This oxidative damage results in a wide
variety of biological effects, including cell death, mutagenesis and gene amplification.
It is known that gene amplification caused by mutagens occurs in fragile sites, causing
chromosomal instability (chromosome fragility). Mutagenic agents causing oxidative
stress, such as doxorubicin, can induce DNA breaks and chromosomal translocations in the
sequences of fragile sites (Hunt ). According to Hunt
, doxorubicin seems to cause damage to
fragile sites, a fact that contradicts studies showing that it causes CAs in randomly
distributed regions on chromosomes (Newsome and
Littlefield, 1975; Coquelle ). The data presented by Hunt corroborate the results obtained in this
study, which showed that doxorubicin did not cause random CAs on M.
gouazoubira chromosomes. Rather, CAs were more frequently mapped at specific
sites. In this study, certain chromosomes were seen to carry more CAs than others, at
frequencies higher than those expected for random distribution. Moreover, on chromosomes
that carried CAs, these occurred more frequently in certain regions, a fact that could
be related to chromosome fragility in the species concerned.Regarding the types of CAs detected in the TC, for both female and male deer, the most
frequently observed types were chromatid break and chromatid gap. Similar results have
also been observed in studies on other mammalian groups, which reported higher
incidences of chromatid-type CAs (Newsome and
Littlefield, 1975; Antunes and Takahashi,
1998; Gülkaç ). High frequencies of chromatid damage are justified by the fact that the
lymphocytes were exposed to a mutagenic agent during the S or G2 phases, when
the chromosomes have two sister chromatids (Evans and
O'Riordan, 1975).It is known that the X sex chromosome of some mammalian species presents an instability
resulting from chromosome fragility (Slota ). Similar results were obtained by Llambí , who observed that the X
chromosome is highly fragile in bovines, unlike the Y chromosome. Besides detecting CAs
on the X sex chromosome in individuals of the species Ovis aries
(Linnaeus 1758), Ahmad showed that X chromosomes of females were generally more fragile than
the X chromosomes of males. Similar findings were not supported by the data obtained
herein, since no significant differences were verified between CA rates in the X
chromosomes of female and male M. gouazoubira.The greater chromosome fragility observed in M. gouazoubira when
submitted to the action of doxorubicin, compared with other species of the genus, may be
related to the fact that the species retains the ancestral karyotype. It seems likely
that this karyotype has fragile sites for rearrangements that were lost in more derived
karyotypes during chromosome evolution of the family Cervidae (Neitzel, 1987; Fontana and Rubini,
1990; Abril ; Vargas-Munar ). Among the rearrangements that have occurred during karyotypic change
and evolution in the family Cervidae, numerous inversions and centric and tandem fusions
can be cited that decreased the diploid number in the process of speciation (Fontana and Rubini, 1990; Abril ). It is possible that fragile
sites contained in the ancestral karyotype have been preserved in the current karyotype
of the brown brocket deer and its genome is still subject to chromosome fragility.
Indications of this are evident in the high rate of intraspecific polymorphism resulting
from centric fusions involving different chromosomes (Duarte and Jorge, 1996; Valeri, 2014).
It is reasonable to assume these centric fusions are composed of chromosomes that have
sequences of fragile sites, which make them more susceptible to the occurrence of this
rearrangement. Four chromosome pairs (X, 4, 7 and 16), characterised as carrying CAs in
this study, were identified as components of centric fusions studied by Valeri (2014) in a population from the Brazilian
Pantanal. These fusions favour the accumulation of constitutive heterochromatin present
in the pericentromeric region. Neitzel (1987)
suggested that pericentromeric heterochromatin is related to the structural organisation
of chromosomes of species of the family Cervidae. Some studies show that CAs,
breakpoints and fragile sites have been detected in the intercalary heterochromatin,
which is a type of euchromatin that possesses the properties of constitutive
heterochromatin (Marlhens ; Laird ; Miró ). In contrast to these findings, and despite the frequent observation of
centric fusions in M. gouazoubira, this study showed that the majority
of the CAs did not map in areas of pericentromeric constitutive heterochromatin.Pevzner and Tesler (2003) proposed a model to
explain the chromosome evolution of mammals, known as “fragile breakage”, which stated
that in the mammalian genome, there are fragile regions (short sequences) and solid
regions (long sequences) that present different probabilities of breakage. The solid
regions are protected against the occurrence of rearrangements, since these blocks
correspond to functional genes, which play vital roles in the development of an
organism. In contrast, the fragile regions are prone to break and reorganise themselves,
representing, for example, a small proportion of blocks of genes involved in adaptive
capacity due to the high evolutionary cost of eliminating mutations that affect multiple
genes simultaneously (Peng ; Becker and Lenhard, 2007). Thus,
it is likely that the CAs identified in this study are located in fragile regions of
M. gouazoubira chromosomes. This fragility leads to a chromosomal
instability, making some regions more susceptible to the occurrence of chromosomal
rearrangements, which could be involved in the impressive karyotype evolution of species
of deer, especially among species of the genus Mazama.The identification of chromosomes with higher rates of aberrations in this work is the
starting point for future studies on the process of karyotype evolution in the genus
Mazama. Using chromosomal probes of these known pairs should lead to
precise knowledge on how they behave during karyotype differentiation between species.
It should then be possible to determine whether the high rate of breaks in these pairs
caused by doxorubicin, a random mutagenic agent, is related to the rearrangements that
have occurred during chromosome evolution.