Literature DB >> 28590154

Practice parameters facilitating adoption of advanced technologies for enhancing neuropsychological assessment paradigms.

Thomas D Parsons1,2, Timothy McMahan2, Robert Kane3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Clinical neuropsychologists have long underutilized computer technologies for neuropsychological assessment. Given the rapid advances in technology (e.g. virtual reality; tablets; iPhones) and the increased accessibility in the past decade, there is an on-going need to identify optimal specifications for advanced technologies while minimizing potential sources of error. Herein, we discuss concerns raised by a joint American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology/National Academy of Neuropsychology position paper. Moreover, we proffer parameters for the development and use of advanced technologies in neuropsychological assessments.
METHOD: We aim to first describe software and hardware configurations that can impact a computerized neuropsychological assessment. This is followed by a description of best practices for developers and practicing neuropsychologists to minimize error in neuropsychological assessments using advanced technologies. We also discuss the relevance of weighing potential computer error in light of possible errors associated with traditional testing. Throughout there is an emphasis on the need for developers to provide bench test results for their software's performance on various devices and minimum specifications (documented in manuals) for the hardware (e.g. computer, monitor, input devices) in the neuropsychologist's practice.
CONCLUSION: Advances in computerized assessment platforms offer both opportunities and challenges. The challenges can appear daunting but are a manageable and require informed consumers who can appreciate the issues and ask pertinent questions in evaluating their options.

Keywords:  Computerized testing; neurocognition; neuropsychological assessment; neuropsychological test validity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28590154     DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1337932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1385-4046            Impact factor:   3.535


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of PC and iPad administrations of the Cogstate Brief Battery in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: Assessing cross-modality equivalence of computerized neuropsychological tests.

Authors:  Nikki H Stricker; Emily S Lundt; Kelly K Edwards; Mary M Machulda; Walter K Kremers; Rosebud O Roberts; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Michelle M Mielke
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Assessment of neurocognitive deficits in people living with HIV in Sub Saharan Africa: A systematic review.

Authors:  Primrose Nyamayaro; Dixon Chibanda; Reuben N Robbins; James Hakim; Hetta Gouse
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 3.  Driving Performance in Older Adults: Current Measures, Findings, and Implications for Roadway Safety.

Authors:  Robert Toups; Theresa J Chirles; Johnathon P Ehsani; Jeffrey P Michael; John P K Bernstein; Matthew Calamia; Thomas D Parsons; David B Carr; Jeffrey N Keller
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2022-01-07

4.  A global collaboration to study intimate partner violence-related head trauma: The ENIGMA consortium IPV working group.

Authors:  Carrie Esopenko; Jessica Meyer; Elisabeth A Wilde; Amy D Marshall; David F Tate; Alexander P Lin; Inga K Koerte; Kimberly B Werner; Emily L Dennis; Ashley L Ware; Nicola L de Souza; Deleene S Menefee; Kristen Dams-O'Connor; Dan J Stein; Erin D Bigler; Martha E Shenton; Kathy S Chiou; Judy L Postmus; Kathleen Monahan; Brenda Eagan-Johnson; Paul van Donkelaar; Tricia L Merkley; Carmen Velez; Cooper B Hodges; Hannah M Lindsey; Paula Johnson; Andrei Irimia; Matthew Spruiell; Esther R Bennett; Ashley Bridwell; Glynnis Zieman; Frank G Hillary
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.978

5.  Current State of Self-Administered Brief Computerized Cognitive Assessments for Detection of Cognitive Disorders in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  E Tsoy; S Zygouris; K L Possin
Journal:  J Prev Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2021

6.  Digital Cognitive Assessments for Dementia: Digital assessments may enhance the efficiency of evaluations in neurology and other clinics.

Authors:  Adam M Staffaroni; Elena Tsoy; Jack Taylor; Adam L Boxer; Katherine L Possin
Journal:  Pract Neurol (Fort Wash Pa)       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec

7.  Executive Function Predicting Longitudinal Change in Type 1 Diabetes Management During the Transition to Emerging Adulthood.

Authors:  Cynthia A Berg; Deborah J Wiebe; Yana Suchy; Sara L Turner; Jonathan Butner; Ascher Munion; Amy Hughes Lansing; Perrin C White; Mary Murray
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Capturing Expert Knowledge for the Personalization of Cognitive Rehabilitation: Study Combining Computational Modeling and a Participatory Design Strategy.

Authors:  Ana Lúcia Faria; Maria Salomé Pinho; Sergi Bermúdez I Badia
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2018-12-06

9.  Developing Digital Tools for Remote Clinical Research: How to Evaluate the Validity and Practicality of Active Assessments in Field Settings.

Authors:  Jennifer Ferrar; Gareth J Griffith; Caroline Skirrow; Nathan Cashdollar; Nick Taptiklis; James Dobson; Fiona Cree; Francesca K Cormack; Jennifer H Barnett; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Global Perspectives on Brief Cognitive Assessments for Dementia Diagnosis.

Authors:  Elena Tsoy; Alissa Bernstein Sideman; Stefanie D Piña Escudero; Maritza Pintado-Caipa; Suchanan Kanjanapong; Tala Al-Rousan; Lingani Mbakile-Mahlanza; Maira Okada de Oliveira; Myriam De la Cruz Puebla; Stelios Zygouris; Aya Ashour Mohamed; Hany Ibrahim; Collette A Goode; Bruce L Miller; Victor Valcour; Katherine L Possin
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.