Literature DB >> 28590028

Phenotypic plasticity drives a depth gradient in male conspicuousness in threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus.

Chad D Brock1,2, Molly E Cummings1, Daniel I Bolnick1.   

Abstract

Signal evolution is thought to depend on both a signal's detectability or conspicuousness (signal design) as well as any extractable information it may convey to a potential receiver (signal content). While theoretical and empirical work in sexual selection has largely focused on signal content, there has been a steady accrual of evidence that signal design is also important for trait evolution. Despite this, relatively little attention has been paid to spatial variation in the conspicuousness of a given signal, especially over small spatial scales (relative to an organism's dispersal distance). Here, we show that visual signals of male threespine stickleback vary in conspicuousness, depending on a male's nest depth within a given lake. Deeper nesting males were typically more chromatically conspicuous than shallow nesting males. This trend is partly because all male stickleback are more conspicuous in deep optical environments. However, deep males are even more conspicuous than environmentally driven null expectations, while shallow males tend to be disproportionally cryptic. Experimental manipulation of male nesting depth induced plastic changes in nuptial color that replicated the natural gradients in conspicuousness. We discuss a number of potential mechanisms that could produce depth gradients in conspicuousness in male stickleback, including concomitant depth gradients in diet, predation pressure, male/female density, female preference, and opportunity for sexual selection.
© 2017 The Author(s). Evolution © 2017 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Local adaptation; microclines; nuptial color; phenotypic plasticity; sensory drive

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28590028     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

1.  Geographical variation in colour of female threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Connor M French; Travis Ingram; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Gene expression in male and female stickleback from populations with convergent and divergent throat coloration.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McKinnon; William Burns Newsome; Christopher N Balakrishnan
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Visual Background Choice and Light Environment Affect Male Guppy Visual Contrast.

Authors:  John A Endler; Dara-Marie Raggay; Solomon Maerowitz-McMahan; David N Reznick; Rebecca C Fuller
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-07

4.  The pervasive effects of lighting environments on sensory drive in bluefin killifish: an investigation into male/male competition, female choice, and predation.

Authors:  Lisa D Mitchem; Shannon Stanis; Nicholas M Sutton; Zachary Turner; Rebecca C Fuller
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.624

5.  25 Years of sensory drive: the evidence and its watery bias.

Authors:  Molly E Cummings; John A Endler
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  Opsin expression predicts male nuptial color in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Chad D Brock; Diana Rennison; Thor Veen; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.