William Dunlop1, Lachlan Hegarty1, Margaret Staples2, Michele Levinson3, Michael Ben-Meir1, Katherine Walker1,4. 1. Emergency Department, Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 2. Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Monash-Cabrini Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate patient perceptions of medical scribes in the ED and to test for scribe impacts on ED Net Promoter Scores, Press Ganey Surveys and other patient-centred topics. METHODS: Exploratory semi-structured interviews were conducted in the ED during wait times after scribed consultations. Interview results were used to derive topics relating to scribes. Items addressing these topics from validated surveys were combined with items from widely used patient satisfaction questionnaires. Questionnaires were administered in the ED by face-to-face approach while patients were waiting for admission/discharge or test results. Patients and doctors were blinded to the purpose of the questionnaire. The survey evaluated for non-inferiority of scribed consultations, using Net Promoter Scores, Press Ganey questions and questions specific to the presence of the scribe. RESULTS: Patient interviews did not identify any negative views regarding the presence of scribes during consultations. Thematic saturation was achieved after seven interviews. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients were approached to complete the questionnaire, and 215 participated (83%); 95 and 118 participants in the scribed and non-scribed groups, respectively. There was no difference between scribed and non-scribed consultations on the following measures of satisfaction: the Net Promoter Score, Press Ganey questions, quality of information received from doctors, communication, privacy concerns or inhibition about revealing private information and room crowding. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that scribes reduce patient satisfaction during emergency consultations, nor prompt discomfort that might cause a patient to withhold information.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate patient perceptions of medical scribes in the ED and to test for scribe impacts on ED Net Promoter Scores, Press Ganey Surveys and other patient-centred topics. METHODS: Exploratory semi-structured interviews were conducted in the ED during wait times after scribed consultations. Interview results were used to derive topics relating to scribes. Items addressing these topics from validated surveys were combined with items from widely used patient satisfaction questionnaires. Questionnaires were administered in the ED by face-to-face approach while patients were waiting for admission/discharge or test results. Patients and doctors were blinded to the purpose of the questionnaire. The survey evaluated for non-inferiority of scribed consultations, using Net Promoter Scores, Press Ganey questions and questions specific to the presence of the scribe. RESULTS:Patient interviews did not identify any negative views regarding the presence of scribes during consultations. Thematic saturation was achieved after seven interviews. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients were approached to complete the questionnaire, and 215 participated (83%); 95 and 118 participants in the scribed and non-scribed groups, respectively. There was no difference between scribed and non-scribed consultations on the following measures of satisfaction: the Net Promoter Score, Press Ganey questions, quality of information received from doctors, communication, privacy concerns or inhibition about revealing private information and room crowding. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that scribes reduce patient satisfaction during emergency consultations, nor prompt discomfort that might cause a patient to withhold information.
Authors: Katherine Walker; Michael Ben-Meir; William Dunlop; Rachel Rosler; Adam West; Gabrielle O'Connor; Thomas Chan; Diana Badcock; Mark Putland; Kim Hansen; Carmel Crock; Danny Liew; David Taylor; Margaret Staples Journal: BMJ Date: 2019-01-30