Literature DB >> 28589482

SASHA versus ShMOLLI: a comparison of T1 mapping methods in health and dilated cardiomyopathy at 3 T.

Benedict T Costello1,2, Fabian Springer1,2, James L Hare1,2, Andre La Gerche1,2, Leah Iles1,2, Andris H Ellims1,2, Benjamin Schmitt3, Andrew J Taylor4,5,6.   

Abstract

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance derived T1 mapping parameters are a non-invasive method of estimating diffuse myocardial fibrosis. This study aims to to determine the native T1 time, post contrast T1 time and extracellular volume (ECV) derived from T1 mapping and to evaluate the ability of T1 mapping techniques to discriminate healthy myocardium from dilated cardiomyopathy. Seventy-nine participants underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at the Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia. Fifty-seven healthy volunteers and twenty-two patients with Dilated cardiomyopathy were included in the study. Each participant had T1 mapping sequences performed at 3 T in the mid short axis slice-both SASHA and ShMOLLI T1 mapping were performed. Native T1, post contrast T1 and ECV values were compared in health and dilated cardiomyopathy. Native T1, post contrast T1 and ECV differed significantly between SASHA and ShMOLLI techniques (P < 0.001). All T1 parameters had similar ability to discriminate normal from abnormal myocardium (ROC AUC 0.691 to 0.830). Converting T1 values to Z scores significantly improved the agreement between SASHA and ShMOLLI techniques, particularly for post contrast T1 (ICC 0.19 to 0.895) and ECV (ICC 0.461 to 0.880). T1 mapping values from SASHA and ShMOLLI show strong correlation for post contrast measures, though with a consistent offset for all measures in health and dilated cardiomyopathy. All measures obtained using SASHA and ShMOLLI allow good discrimination between dilated cardiomyopathy and normal myocardium.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac magnetic resonance; Cardiomyopathy; Fibrosis; T1 mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28589482     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1134-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  26 in total

1.  Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable?

Authors:  N G Bellenger; M I Burgess; S G Ray; A Lahiri; A J Coats; J G Cleland; D J Pennell
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  T1 Mapping: Basic Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Andrew J Taylor; Michael Salerno; Rohan Dharmakumar; Michael Jerosch-Herold
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-01

3.  On T2* magnetic resonance and cardiac iron.

Authors:  John-Paul Carpenter; Taigang He; Paul Kirk; Michael Roughton; Lisa J Anderson; Sofia V de Noronha; Mary N Sheppard; John B Porter; J Malcolm Walker; John C Wood; Renzo Galanello; Gianluca Forni; Gualtiero Catani; Gildo Matta; Suthat Fucharoen; Adam Fleming; Michael J House; Greg Black; David N Firmin; Timothy G St Pierre; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  T1 mapping of the gadolinium-enhanced myocardium: adjustment for factors affecting interpatient comparison.

Authors:  Neville Gai; Evrim B Turkbey; Saman Nazarian; Rob J van der Geest; Chia-Ying Liu; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Evaluation of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with cardiac magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced T1 mapping.

Authors:  Leah Iles; Heinz Pfluger; Arintaya Phrommintikul; Joshi Cherayath; Pelin Aksit; Sandeep N Gupta; David M Kaye; Andrew J Taylor
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Native T1 mapping in differentiation of normal myocardium from diffuse disease in hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Valentina O Puntmann; Tobias Voigt; Zhong Chen; Manuel Mayr; Rashed Karim; Kawal Rhode; Ana Pastor; Gerald Carr-White; Reza Razavi; Tobias Schaeffter; Eike Nagel
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-03-14

7.  Reference values for healthy human myocardium using a T1 mapping methodology: results from the International T1 Multicenter cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Darius Dabir; Nicholas Child; Ashwin Kalra; Toby Rogers; Rolf Gebker; Andrew Jabbour; Sven Plein; Chung-Yao Yu; James Otton; Ananth Kidambi; Adam McDiarmid; David Broadbent; David M Higgins; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Lucy Foote; Ciara Cummins; Eike Nagel; Valentina O Puntmann
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequences for native myocardial T1 mapping at 3T.

Authors:  Tiago Teixeira; Tarik Hafyane; Nikola Stikov; Cansu Akdeniz; Andreas Greiser; Matthias G Friedrich
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Myocardial T1-mapping at 3T using saturation-recovery: reference values, precision and comparison with MOLLI.

Authors:  Sebastian Weingärtner; Nadja M Meßner; Johannes Budjan; Dirk Loßnitzer; Uwe Mattler; Theano Papavassiliu; Frank G Zöllner; Lothar R Schad
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Comprehensive validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the assessment of myocardial extracellular volume.

Authors:  Christopher A Miller; Josephine H Naish; Paul Bishop; Glyn Coutts; David Clark; Sha Zhao; Simon G Ray; Nizar Yonan; Simon G Williams; Andrew S Flett; James C Moon; Andreas Greiser; Geoffrey J M Parker; Matthias Schmitt
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 7.792

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Amer Alaiti; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update.

Authors:  Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Scott J Hetzel; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Gabriella Captur; Christopher J Francois; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Michael Salerno; Shawn D Teague; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Rob J van der Geest; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  An Interim Report of the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Working Groups.

Authors:  Murray Baron; Bashar Kahaleh; Elana J Bernstein; Lorinda Chung; Philip J Clements; Christopher Denton; Robyn T Domsic; Nava Ferdowsi; Ivan Foeldvari; Tracy Frech; Jessica K Gordon; Marie Hudson; Sindhu R Johnson; Dinesh Khanna; Zsuzsannah McMahan; Peter A Merkel; Sonali Narain; Mandana Nikpour; John D Pauling; Laura Ross; Antonia Maria Valenzuela Vergara; Alessandra Vacca
Journal:  J Scleroderma Relat Disord       Date:  2018-07-18

4.  Native T1 time and extracellular volume fraction in differentiation of normal myocardium from non-ischemic dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy myocardium: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shintaro Minegishi; Shingo Kato; Kaoru Takase-Minegishi; Nobuyuki Horita; Kengo Azushima; Hiromichi Wakui; Tomoaki Ishigami; Masami Kosuge; Kazuo Kimura; Kouichi Tamura
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2019-09-07

5.  Using magnetic resonance imaging to map the hidden burden of muscle involvement in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  André La Gerche; Mandana Nikpour; Laura Ross; Anniina Lindqvist; Benedict Costello; Dylan Hansen; Zoe Brown; Jessica A Day; Wendy Stevens; Andrew Burns; Warren Perera; Marcus Pianta
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 5.156

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.