Literature DB >> 28589479

Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section.

Yan Chen1, Ping Han2, Yi-Jia Wang2, Yan-Xia Li2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze related risk factors of post-cesarean scar defects (PCSDs).
METHODS: A retrospective study of full-term women delivered by cesarean with singleton infants at our hospital from April 2014 to December 2015 was performed. 69 cases of diagnosed PCSDs and 107 cases with no PCSD who accepted cesarean were recruited for analysis. Individual medical case and operative report review were retrieved for maternal clinical characteristics analysis.
RESULTS: There was no difference in age, gestational age, BMI and baby's weight between the two groups. PCSD group has more cases of anemia, higher neutrophil percentage and more cases of elected cesarean and emergency cesarean than controls (all p < 0.05). For woman who received emergency cesarean, there were more cases with cervix dilated larger than 3 cm in operation and more cases received cesarean at least one time before. In addition, women with cesarean interval of at least 5 years, women with ultrasonic measured echo longer than 3 cm, women with poor healing in uterine incision, women with retroposition of uterus and women who had intrauterine separation are more prone to develop PCSDs.
CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of a defective uterine scar after cesarean section is primarily a by-product of the combination of multiple factors: age ≥30 years, BMI ≥27.30, premature rupture of membranes, elective cesarean section, post-operative anemia, WBC count ≥12.5 × 109 g/L and retroposition of uterus. These are high risk factors of PCSDs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; Post-cesarean scar defects (PCSDs); Risk factors; Ultrasound examination

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28589479     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4417-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  4 in total

1.  Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Management of Diagnostic Uncertainty in Low-Resource Settings: A Case Report of Cesarean Ectopic Pregnancy in a Tertiary Hospital in Ghana.

Authors:  Anna Sarah Erem; Thomas Okpoti Konney; Adu Appiah-Kubi; Kwasi Ankomah; Adu Tutu Amankwa; John Jude Kweku Annan; Augustine Tawiah; Benjamin Kwame Amoako-Adjei; Kwabena Fosu Lartey; Emma R Lawrence
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2020-12-28

2.  Analysis of risk factors for cesarean scar diverticulum: A STROBE-compliant case-control study.

Authors:  Songjun Liu; Linlin Chen; Guang Zhu; Yupei Shao; Shuqian Yu; Wu Li; Wen Lv
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Risk factors for Korean women to develop an isthmocele after a cesarean section.

Authors:  I Y Park; M R Kim; H N Lee; Y Gen; M J Kim
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Identifying possible risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy based on a retrospective study of 291 cases.

Authors:  XianYi Zhou; Hua Li; XiaoDong Fu
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 1.730

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.