Literature DB >> 28589215

Utilities of scrotal flap for reconstruction of penile skin defects after severe burn injury.

Le Guo1, Minghua Zhang1, Jizhang Zeng1, Pengfei Liang1, Pihong Zhang1, Xiaoyuan Huang2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we aimed to present our experience of an effective two-stage surgical approach using scrotal skin flap for patients with penile skin defects following severe burn injury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 17 patients with penile skin defects underwent scheduled two-stage reconstruction using scrotal skin flap from January 2004 to October 2016. Patients, who were selected as eligible candidates for scrotal flap, exhibited a wide range of indications, including iatrogenic injuries (e.g., diathermy treatment after circumcision), scalding, flame injuries and electrical burns. During the first stage, the denuded penis secondary to debridement was temporally embedded in scrotal skin flap through an intrascrotal tunnel created between the skin and darto's fascia. During the second stage, the skin around the penis was separated and divided from the scrotum after incising the scrotal skin at the ventral penile base. After a mean follow-up of 30 months, the reconstructed penises yielded satisfactory aesthetic outcomes and maintained erectile function.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 35 years (19-55 years), and the median follow-up was 30 months (12-60 months). No major perioperative complication occurred except for dehiscence of scrotal skin after 2nd stage in three patients, and split-thickness skin grafts were applied for recovery of scrotum. Of 17 cases, 15 patients (88.2%) were in satisfactory cosmetic appearance. All patients regained penile sensation and normal voiding function in standing position. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was used to assess sexual function, with 13 patients (76.5%) reported normal erectile function, while the rest 4 reported mild erectile dysfunction. With regards to intercourse satisfaction domain, encouraging results indicated a total of 17 patients resumed sexual intercourse after surgery. In overall satisfaction domain, 11/17 (64.7%) reported a satisfaction from "very" to "moderately" with their overall sex life and sexual relationship with their partners, while only one patient reported "moderately dissatisfied" with his overall sex life.
CONCLUSIONS: We report a series of particular cases, including rare iatrogenic injury (diathermy treatment after circumcision) and severe compound electrical injury. Meanwhile, we show our successful experience that scrotal skin flap could be used as an effective surgical alternative to cover severe burn injury wound in male genitalia. The scrotal flap, with higher anti-infection ability and flexible contexture, is available for recovering penile skin defects following severe burn injury resulting in good aesthetic and sexual outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Penile skin defects; Scrotal skin flap; Severe burn injury; Tissue coverage

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28589215     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1635-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  32 in total

1.  Care of the degloved penis and scrotum: a 25-year experience.

Authors:  S J Finical; P G Arnold
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Penile and upper extremity amputation following high-voltage electrical trauma: case report.

Authors:  Alan Landecker; Luiz Macieira
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.744

3.  Severe burn of penis caused by excessive short-wave diathermy.

Authors:  Jun Jiang; Fang-Qiang Zhu; Jun Luo; Luo-Fu Wang; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  Management of genital burns: a review.

Authors:  Dirk P J Michielsen; Cynthia Lafaire
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Application of vacuum-assisted closure dressing in penile skin graft reconstruction.

Authors:  Alex Senchenkov; James Knoetgen; Kristin L Chrouser; Ajay Nehra
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Normal penile, scrotal, and perineal anatomy with reconstructive considerations.

Authors:  Moira E Dwyer; Christopher J Salgado; Deborah J Lightner
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.314

7.  Reconstructive surgery for penoscrotal filarial lymphedema: a decade of experience and follow-up.

Authors:  Vishwajeet Singh; Rahul Janak Sinha; S N Sankhwar; Vijay Kumar
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Functional restoration of penis with partial defect by scrotal skin flap.

Authors:  Yue-Qiang Zhao; Jie Zhang; Mo-Sheng Yu; Dao-Chou Long
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  An alternative flap choice in penis skin defects: preputial mucosal flap.

Authors:  Mehmet Bozkurt; Fatih Zor; Yalcin Kulahci; Emin Kapi; Percin Karakol
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Sexual outcomes after partial penectomy for penile cancer: results from a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Salvatore Sansalone; Mauro Silvani; Rosario Leonardi; Giuseppe Vespasiani; Valerio Iacovelli
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

View more
  2 in total

1.  At The Forefront of Penile Surgical Reconstruction: A Bibliometric Study of the 100 Most-Cited Articles.

Authors:  Minliang Wu; Rui Chen; Yalong Xu; Xiaolei Shi; Ruixiang Song; Mengyan Sun; Chunyu Xue; Yuchong Wang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Scrotal Tissues: The Perfect Material for Urogenital Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ruben T Adamyan; Armais A Kamalov; Misak M Ehoyan; Olesya I Starceva; Eduard N Urshevich; Mikhail Y Sinelnikov
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-07-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.