Literature DB >> 28588902

Hypertensive response to exercise and exercise training in hypertension: odd couple no more.

Elisa Caldarone1, Paolo Severi1,2, Mario Lombardi1, Stefania D'Emidio1, Andrea Mazza3, Maria Grazia Bendini3, Massimo Leggio2.   

Abstract

The diagnostic and prognostic implication of exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise has been controversial, with opinions ranging from a benign process to a harbinger of potential cardiovascular morbidity. Nonetheless, lowering of blood pressure and prevention of hypertension is in first instance preferable by lifestyle changes, and many studies have shown the inverse association between physical activity level and the incidence of cardiovascular diseases suggesting low aerobic fitness as a strong predictor for future cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in both healthy and cardiovascular disease patients, including those with hypertension. Endothelial function, large artery stiffness and neurohormonal response are surely implicated both in the development of exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise and in the positive effect of physical exercise in the prevention and management of hypertension and cardiovascular disease in general. In their interesting and well documented review published in this issue Kim and Ha broadly described the possible pathophysiologic mechanisms of exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise and its clinical implications: in this regard, a very interesting issue could be represented by the role of exercise training. In fact, there is an the ample evidence in the literature that physical activity could positively affect endothelial function, arterial stiffness, neurohormonal response and finally blood pressure levels both in healthy men and in hypertensive patients and so should be considered a very important element in the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise; Hypertension; Prevention and management of cardiovascular disease

Year:  2017        PMID: 28588902      PMCID: PMC5455108          DOI: 10.1186/s40885-017-0067-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Hypertens        ISSN: 2056-5909


The diagnostic and prognostic implication of exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise has been controversial, with opinions ranging from a benign process to a harbinger of potential cardiovascular morbidity [1]. Nonetheless, lowering of blood pressure and prevention of hypertension is in first instance preferable by lifestyle changes, and many studies have shown the inverse association between physical activity level and the incidence of cardiovascular diseases suggesting low aerobic fitness as a strong predictor for future cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in both healthy and cardiovascular disease patients, including those with hypertension [2]. Although an important challenge is to increase the attention on strategies to maintain or improve fitness and to intensify and support the efforts to encourage physical activity, a large body of previous evidences demonstrated that an exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise is not an innocuous finding but associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events, and has been shown to be a predictor of future hypertension and risk of cardiovascular mortality [3]. Endothelial function, large artery stiffness and neurohormonal response are surely implicated both in the development of exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise and in the positive effect of physical exercise in the prevention and management of hypertension and cardiovascular disease in general; consequently, it seems mandatory to mutually promote early diagnosis/treatment of exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise in healthy subjects without hypertension and encourage physical activity in prevention, treatment, and control of all stages of hypertension [2, 4]. In their interesting and well documented review published in this issue Kim and Ha [5] broadly described the possible pathophysiologic mechanisms of exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise and its clinical implications, emphasizing that this phenomenon is not a benign one but a quite dangerous alarm, and also suggesting that even if it is still controversial whether to treat exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise and treatment strategy still remains uncertain its pathologic nature and its association with functional and structural impairment of left ventricle, future development of hypertension and increased cardiovascular events require further investigation. In this regard, a very interesting issue could be represented by the role of exercise training. In fact, there is an the ample evidence in the literature that physical activity could positively affect endothelial function, arterial stiffness, neurohormonal response and finally blood pressure levels both in healthy men and in hypertensive patients and so should be considered a very important element in the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease. Hence, further consensus on definition and method to measure exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise is required, and prospective studies with aggressive lifestyle modification in individuals with exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise are needed to evaluate the potential benefits.
  5 in total

1.  Is an exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise in hypertensive patients a benign phenomenon or a dangerous alarm?

Authors:  Mohamed A Kader Abdel Wahab
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 7.804

2.  Endothelial dysfunction and alteration of nitric oxide/ cyclic GMP pathway in patients with exercise-induced hypertension.

Authors:  Hyuk Jae Chang; Jae Hoon Chung; Byoung Joo Choi; Tae Young Choi; So Yeon Choi; Myeong Ho Yoon; Gyo Seung Hwang; Joon Han Shin; Seung Jea Tahk; Byung-Il William Choi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Effects of exercise training on systo-diastolic ventricular dysfunction in patients with hypertension: an echocardiographic study with tissue velocity and strain imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Massimo Leggio; Andrea Mazza; Giancarlo Cruciani; Luca Sgorbini; Marco Pugliese; Maria Grazia Bendini; Paolo Severi; Anna Patrizia Jesi
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.872

4.  Exaggerated Exercise Blood Pressure Response and Future Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Nikolaos Tzemos; Pitt O Lim; Isla S Mackenzie; Thomas M MacDonald
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 5.  Hypertensive response to exercise: mechanisms and clinical implication.

Authors:  Darae Kim; Jong-Won Ha
Journal:  Clin Hypertens       Date:  2016-07-26
  5 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Physical Exercise and Neuroinflammation in Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Zuleide M Ignácio; Renato S da Silva; Marcos E Plissari; João Quevedo; Gislaine Z Réus
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Cardiovascular Disease Mortality and Potential Risk Factor in China: A Multi-Dimensional Assessment by a Grey Relational Approach.

Authors:  Shazia Rehman; Erum Rehman; Ayesha Mumtaz; Zhang Jianglin
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 3.  Exercise-Induced Hypertension in Healthy Individuals and Athletes: Is it an Alarming Sign?

Authors:  Linha Lina M Mohammed; Meera Dhavale; Mohamed K Abdelaal; A B M Nasibul Alam; Tatjana Blazin; Dhruvil Prajapati; Jihan A Mostafa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-12-09

4.  NOS3 Polymorphisms Can Influence the Effect of Multicomponent Training on Blood Pressure, Nitrite Concentration and Physical Fitness in Prehypertensive and Hypertensive Older Adult Women.

Authors:  Átila Alexandre Trapé; Jhennyfer Aline Lima Rodrigues; Letícia Perticarrara Ferezin; Gustavo Duarte Ferrari; Elisangela Aparecida da Silva Lizzi; Vitor Nolasco de Moraes; Roberta Fernanda da Silva; Anderson Saranz Zago; Javier Brazo-Sayavera; Carlos Roberto Bueno Júnior
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.