Literature DB >> 28588883

Compliance with evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines on perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Robert Js Coelen1, Joost Huiskens1, Pim B Olthof1, Eva Roos1, Jimme K Wiggers1, Annuska Schoorlemmer1, Otto M van Delden2, Heinz-Josef Klümpen3, Erik Aj Rauws4, Thomas M van Gulik1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discrepancies are often noted between management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) in regional hospitals and the eventual treatment plan in specialized centers.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to evaluate whether regional centers adhere to guideline recommendations following implementation in 2013.
METHODS: Data were analyzed from all consecutive patients with suspected PHC referred to our academic center between June 2013 and December 2015. Frequency and quality of biliary drainage and imaging at referring centers were assessed as well as the impact of inadequate initial drainage.
RESULTS: Biliary drainage was attempted at regional centers in 83 of 158 patients (52.5%), with a technical and therapeutic success rate of 79.5% and 50%, respectively, and a complication rate of 45.8%. The computed tomography protocol was not in accordance with guidelines in 52.8% of referrals. In 45 patients (54.2%) who underwent drainage in regional centers, additional drainage procedures were required after referral. Initial inadequate biliary drainage at a regional center was significantly associated with more procedures and a prolonged waiting time until surgery. A trend toward more drainage-related complications was observed among patients with inadequate initial drainage (54.7% vs. 39.0%, p = 0.061).
CONCLUSION: Despite available guidelines, suboptimal management of PHC persists in many regional centers and affects eventual treatment strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; biliary drainage; compliance; guidelines; management

Year:  2016        PMID: 28588883      PMCID: PMC5446149          DOI: 10.1177/2050640616673517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  22 in total

1.  Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data.

Authors:  S M Schutz; R M Abbott
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline.

Authors:  J-M Dumonceau; A Tringali; D Blero; J Devière; R Laugiers; D Heresbach; G Costamagna
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  MR imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography in the preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Riccardo Manfredi; Amorino Vecchioli; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement.

Authors:  John C Mansour; Thomas A Aloia; Christopher H Crane; Julie K Heimbach; Masato Nagino; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Evolution of surgical treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center 34-year review of 574 consecutive resections.

Authors:  Masato Nagino; Tomoki Ebata; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tsuyoshi Igami; Gen Sugawara; Yu Takahashi; Yuji Nimura
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Prospective evaluation of ERCP performance: results of a nationwide quality registry.

Authors:  Vivian E Ekkelenkamp; Robert A de Man; Frank Ter Borg; Pieter C J Ter Borg; Marco J Bruno; Marcel J M Groenen; Bettina E Hansen; Antonie J P van Tilburg; Erik A J Rauws; Arjun D Koch
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas.

Authors:  Niels A van der Gaag; Erik A J Rauws; Casper H J van Eijck; Marco J Bruno; Erwin van der Harst; Frank J G M Kubben; Josephus J G M Gerritsen; Jan Willem Greve; Michael F Gerhards; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Jean H Klinkenbijl; Chung Y Nio; Steve M M de Castro; Olivier R C Busch; Thomas M van Gulik; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: role of preoperative imaging with sonography, MDCT, MRI, and direct cholangiography.

Authors:  Jin-Young Choi; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Ki Whang Kim; Jae Young Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Preoperative cholangitis independently increases in-hospital mortality after combined major hepatic and bile duct resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Sakata; Yoshio Shirai; Yoshiaki Tsuchiya; Toshifumi Wakai; Tatsuya Nomura; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Prospective international multicenter study on endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Mouen A Khashab; Schalk Van der Merwe; Rastislav Kunda; Mohamad H El Zein; Anthony Y Teoh; Fernando P Marson; Carlo Fabbri; Ilaria Tarantino; Shyam Varadarajulu; Rani J Modayil; Stavros N Stavropoulos; Irene Peñas; Saowanee Ngamruengphong; Vivek Kumbhari; Joseph Romagnuolo; Raj Shah; Anthony N Kalloo; Manuel Perez-Miranda; Everson L Artifon
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.