Literature DB >> 28588334

Use of a non-invasive surgical skin closure device in dogs following dorsolateral hemilaminectomy.

Christopher Corrie1, Justin Shmalberg1, Christine Senneca1, Bobbi Conner1.   

Abstract

The ZipLine 16 surgical skin closure device (ZipLine 16; Zipline Medical, Campbell, California, USA) provides noninvasive surgical wound closure. This prospective study investigated its use in dogs undergoing a dorsolateral hemilaminectomy. Although the device produced normal appositional healing compared with controls, unacceptable traumatic dermatitis that is likely related to the device adhesive was noted after removal.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28588334      PMCID： PMC5432151     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Vet J        ISSN： 0008-5286            Impact factor:   1.008


  11 in total

1.  Staple vs. subcuticular vicryl skin closure in knee replacement surgery: a spectrophotographic assessment of wound characteristics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Management of lacerations in the emergency department.

Authors:  Otilia Capellan; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 3.  A review of sutures and other skin closure materials.

Authors:  Ani L Tajirian; David J Goldberg
Journal:  J Cosmet Laser Ther       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.247

4.  A novel noninvasive wound closure device as the final layer in skin closure.

Authors:  David C Gorsulowsky; Guy Talmor
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.398

5.  Do zip-type skin-closing devices show better wound status compared to conventional staple devices in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jae Han Ko; Ick Hwan Yang; Min Seok Ko; Eshnazarov Kamolhuja; Kwan Kyu Park
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  Closure techniques.

Authors:  Jeremy D Lloyd; Melvin J Marque; Robert F Kacprowicz
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Using a non-invasive secure skin closure following total knee arthroplasty leads to fewer wound complications and no patient home care visits compared to surgical staples.

Authors:  Alberto V Carli; Sara Spiro; Brian T Barlow; Steven B Haas
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Comparing wound complication rates following closure of hip wounds with metallic skin staples or subcuticular vicryl suture: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  A A Shetty; V S Kumar; C Morgan-Hough; G A Georgeu; K D James; J E Nicholl
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.118

Review 9.  Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Debbie Sexton; Charles Mann; Simon Donell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-16

10.  Foreign body reaction after usage of tissue adhesives for skin closure: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Adrian Dragu; Frank Unglaub; Stephan Schwarz; Justus P Beier; Ulrich Kneser; Alexander D Bach; Raymund E Horch
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.067
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.