Chitprasong Malaisri1, Angsana Phuphuakrat1, Arrug Wibulpolprasert2, Pitak Santanirand3, Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul4. 1. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. 3. Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. 4. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Electronic address: sasisopin.kie@mahidol.ac.th.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The overuse and misuse of carbapenems have contributed to the antibiotic resistance crisis. The role of oral fluoroquinolones as a switch therapy for the treatment of urinary tract infection from Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) is limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of sitafloxacin and ertapenem for non-bacteremic acute pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-EC. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial of patients with acute pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-EC was performed as a pilot study. One of the carbapenems was initially given to the patients. After day 3, patients were randomized to receive either sitafloxacin or ertapenem. RESULTS:Thirty-six patients were enrolled: 19 (52.8%) in the sitafloxacin group and 17 (47.2%) in the ertapenem group. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups except a lower proportion of previous urinary catheter insertion in the sitafloxacin group (15.8% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.018). Signs and symptoms at presentation were similar between the two groups except a higher proportion of patients with chills in the sitafloxacin group (68.4% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.019). At day 10, all but one patient in the ertapenem group had clinical cure. Microbiological eradication was comparable between the sitafloxacin and ertapenem groups (84.2% vs. 75%, p = 0.677). There were no significant adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of non-bacteremic acute pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-EC with carbapenem followed by oral sitafloxacin is effective and well-tolerated. Sitafloxacin may be considered as an alternative choice of switch therapy in this clinical setting.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The overuse and misuse of carbapenems have contributed to the antibiotic resistance crisis. The role of oral fluoroquinolones as a switch therapy for the treatment of urinary tract infection from Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) is limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of sitafloxacin and ertapenem for non-bacteremic acute pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-EC. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial of patients with acute pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-EC was performed as a pilot study. One of the carbapenems was initially given to the patients. After day 3, patients were randomized to receive either sitafloxacin or ertapenem. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled: 19 (52.8%) in the sitafloxacin group and 17 (47.2%) in the ertapenem group. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups except a lower proportion of previous urinary catheter insertion in the sitafloxacin group (15.8% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.018). Signs and symptoms at presentation were similar between the two groups except a higher proportion of patients with chills in the sitafloxacin group (68.4% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.019). At day 10, all but one patient in the ertapenem group had clinical cure. Microbiological eradication was comparable between the sitafloxacin and ertapenem groups (84.2% vs. 75%, p = 0.677). There were no significant adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of non-bacteremic acute pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-EC with carbapenem followed by oral sitafloxacin is effective and well-tolerated. Sitafloxacin may be considered as an alternative choice of switch therapy in this clinical setting.
Authors: Florian M E Wagenlehner; Truls E Bjerklund Johansen; Tommaso Cai; Bela Koves; Jennifer Kranz; Adrian Pilatz; Zafer Tandogdu Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2020-08-25 Impact factor: 14.432