Literature DB >> 28587919

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS®) for Patients with Urolithiasis: Initial Report.

Michael S Borofsky1, Giulia I Lane2, Suzanne M Neises3, Andrew J Portis4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Health related quality of life is increasingly important in quality improvement efforts for medical conditions. However, it has proved challenging to measure health related quality of life for urolithiasis, given the distinct chronic and acute phases of this disease. We evaluated the use of PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System) to assess the patient experience through acute stone episode stages.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PROMIS pain measures (intensity and interference) were obtained from patients at a subspecialty kidney stone clinic. Four types of clinical encounters were considered, including emergency department followup, trial of passage, stent removal and 1-month postoperative findings. Raw scores were translated into population normed T-scores with a T-score of 50 considered the reference population mean and a score of 60 considered 1 SD above the mean. T-scores were compared across encounter types on univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 2,018 complete surveys were available from 1,162 patients. Mean pain intensity and pain interference T-scores differed significantly by encounter type (p <0.001). On multivariate analysis the OR of T-scores greater than 60 was higher for pain intensity and interference for all encounter types relative to postoperative findings, including emergency department followup 37.9 vs 124.9, passage trial 5.4 vs 10.5 and stent removal 9.4 vs 30.2 (p <0.001). Additionally, female gender and younger age were independent risk factors for T-scores greater than 60.
CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS pain measures are responsive to the phase of care during symptomatic stone events. Further application of this instrument holds great potential as a valuable tool to improve the quality of urolithiasis care.
Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  kidney; pain; patient reported outcome measures; ureter; urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28587919     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.05.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

Review 1.  Validated Methods of Assessing Quality of Life in Stone Disease.

Authors:  Ruchika Talwar; Justin Ziemba
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The impact of urinary stone disease and their treatment on patients' quality of life: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Aditya Raja; Fiona Wood; Hrishi B Joshi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Quality of life impact and recovery after ureteroscopy and stent insertion: insights from daily surveys in STENTS.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Alana C Desai; Jodi A Antonelli; Gregory E Tasian; Justin B Ziemba; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; H Henry Lai; Naim M Maalouf; Peter P Reese; Hunter B Wessells; Ziya Kirkali; Charles D Scales
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Study to Enhance Understanding of Stent-Associated Symptoms: Rationale and Study Design.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; H Henry Lai; Alana C Desai; Jodi A Antonelli; Naim M Maalouf; Gregory E Tasian; Peter P Reese; Michele Curatolo; Kevin Weinfurt; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Hunter Wessells; Ziya Kirkali; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.619

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.