Edward Chong1, Esther Ho2, Jewel Baldevarona-Llego2, Mark Chan2, Lynn Wu2, Laura Tay3. 1. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: edward_chong@ttsh.com.sg. 2. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore. 3. Department of General Medicine, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of data for the assessment of frailty in acutely ill hospitalized older adults. We aim to (1) compare the performance of frailty measures [5-item scale of fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight) (FRAIL), Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)] in identifying frailty, using the widely adopted Frailty Index (FI) as "gold standard," and (2) compare their ability to predict negative outcomes among hospitalized older adults. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Acute inpatient care. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 210 patients (mean age 89.4 ± 4.6 years, 69.5% female) admitted to the Department of Geriatric Medicine. MEASUREMENTS: Premorbid frailty status was assessed by FI, FRAIL, TFI, and CFS. We collected data on comorbidities, severity of illness, functional status, and cognitive status. We compared area under receiver operator characteristic curves for FRAIL, TFI, and CFS against the reference FI. Multiple logistic regression was performed to examine the association between frailty and the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Frailty prevalence estimates were 87.1% (FI), 50% (FRAIL), 80% (TFI), and 81% (CFS). Area under receiver operator characteristics against FI ranged from 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.90: FRAIL] to 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.95: CFS), with no significant difference on receiver operating characteristic curve contrast. Frailty, as defined by FRAIL score ≥3, was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (6.7% vs 1.0%, P = .031) and length of hospitalization [10 days (6.0-17.5) vs 8 days (5.0-14.0), P = .043]. FI [odds ratio (OR) = 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.33, P = .05], FRAIL (OR = 3.31, 95% CI 1.43-7.67, P = .005), and CFS (OR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.14-5.83, P = .023) independently predicted in-hospital mortality adjusted for age, sex, and severity of illness. CONCLUSIONS: FRAIL and CFS are simple frailty measures that may identify older adults at highest risk of adverse outcomes of hospitalization. FRAIL performed better in predicting in-hospital mortality.
OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of data for the assessment of frailty in acutely ill hospitalized older adults. We aim to (1) compare the performance of frailty measures [5-item scale of fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight) (FRAIL), Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)] in identifying frailty, using the widely adopted Frailty Index (FI) as "gold standard," and (2) compare their ability to predict negative outcomes among hospitalized older adults. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Acute inpatient care. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 210 patients (mean age 89.4 ± 4.6 years, 69.5% female) admitted to the Department of Geriatric Medicine. MEASUREMENTS: Premorbid frailty status was assessed by FI, FRAIL, TFI, and CFS. We collected data on comorbidities, severity of illness, functional status, and cognitive status. We compared area under receiver operator characteristic curves for FRAIL, TFI, and CFS against the reference FI. Multiple logistic regression was performed to examine the association between frailty and the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Frailty prevalence estimates were 87.1% (FI), 50% (FRAIL), 80% (TFI), and 81% (CFS). Area under receiver operator characteristics against FI ranged from 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.90: FRAIL] to 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.95: CFS), with no significant difference on receiver operating characteristic curve contrast. Frailty, as defined by FRAIL score ≥3, was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (6.7% vs 1.0%, P = .031) and length of hospitalization [10 days (6.0-17.5) vs 8 days (5.0-14.0), P = .043]. FI [odds ratio (OR) = 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.33, P = .05], FRAIL (OR = 3.31, 95% CI 1.43-7.67, P = .005), and CFS (OR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.14-5.83, P = .023) independently predicted in-hospital mortality adjusted for age, sex, and severity of illness. CONCLUSIONS: FRAIL and CFS are simple frailty measures that may identify older adults at highest risk of adverse outcomes of hospitalization. FRAIL performed better in predicting in-hospital mortality.
Authors: Christian Jung; Raphael Romano Bruno; Bernhard Wernly; Georg Wolff; Michael Beil; Malte Kelm Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Rebecca S Crow; Matthew C Lohman; Alexander J Titus; Martha L Bruce; Todd A Mackenzie; Stephen J Bartels; John A Batsis Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Patricia Torres-Perez; María Álvarez-Satta; Mariano Arrazola; Larraitz Egaña; Manuel Moreno-Valladares; Jorge Villanua; Irune Ruiz; Nicolas Sampron; Ander Matheu Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: David Clark; Kara Matheson; Benjamin West; Amanda Vinson; Kenneth West; Arsh Jain; Kenneth Rockwood; Karthik Tennankore Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2021-06-10