Literature DB >> 28587367

Seasonal trends in the prevalence of hypospadias: Aetiological implications.

C Mamoulakis1, G Avgenakis1, C Gkatzoudi2, G Duyker2, I E Zisis1, I Heretis1, S Antypas3, N Sofikitis4, D A Spandidos5, A M Tsatsakis6, A Tzonou7.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the seasonality of hypospadias in Greece in an attempt to elucidate the aetiology. All boys born between 1991-1998, who underwent hypospadias repair at 'Aghia Sophia' Children's Hospital, Athens (n=542) were analysed. All Greek live-born males during the same period (population at risk; m=421,175) served as the controls. Seasonality by month of birth was evaluated with specific statistical tools. Meteorological parameters were also analysed. All tests yielded significant results, suggesting a simple harmonic prevalence pattern (highest/lowest: autumn, peak in October/spring, trough in April). Therefore, the first trimester of hypospadiac gestations coincides more frequently with winter. Meteorological parameters varied seasonally (maximal sunlight; air temperature in summer/minimal in winter, maximal rainfall in winter/minimal in summer) and were strongly associated pairwise. Hypospadiac birth prevalence follows a simple harmonic seasonal pattern and is associated with that of cryptorchidism in Greece. The coincidence of the first or third trimester of a potentially genetically influenced gestation with winter could lead to the phenotypic expression of hypospadias or cryptorchidism, respectively. The potential role of a cyclic-varied androgen-production stimulator, such as human chorionic gonadotrophin may be speculated. The seasonality of a common environmental factor acting directly/indirectly may contribute to these patterns, and possibly to the common pathogenesis of these congenital malformations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congenital anomaly; epidemiology; hypospadias; prevalence; seasonal variation

Year:  2017        PMID: 28587367      PMCID: PMC5450666          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


Introduction

Hypospadias is a relatively common congenital malformation with a total prevalence of 18.61 per 10,000 male live births reported in Europe, remaining stable during the previous decade (1). The aetiology of this condition is obscure, with a general agreement on its multifactorial nature assuming the cooperation of genetic factors with exogenous factors, disrupting the male sex hormone axis (2–6). It is associated with other defects, particularly with cryptorchidism (7,8). Several risk factors have been reported; however, not all of them are uniformly accepted. Seasonality stands as a common component of the basic aetiological description for congenital abnormalities. Infections early in pregnancy for example, represent a theoretical risk for any birth defect. If infectious agents potentially linked to hypospadias include some that are common at particular times of the year, their seasonal variation may be reflected in the pattern of month of birth (MB) of affected males (9). Thus, seasonal variations (SV) of hypospadiac prevalence have been widely investigated worldwide, particularly in the past, with conflicting results; some authors have reported significant variations, while others have not (please see below). In the present study, in an attempt to elucidate the aetiology, a retrospective analysis was performed on hypospadiac births (HB) in Greece, based on the strict use of statistical tools specifically designed for investigating SV of congenital malformations.

Materials and methods

All Greek boys born within the period 1991–1998 who underwent hypospadias repair at a major pediatric center in Athens (Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital) comprised the study population (n=542). All live-born boys within the same period comprised the population at risk (m=421,175) and served as the controls. Data on the study population were accrued through the center's Statistical Department. Data on the population at risk were collected from the Hellenic Statistical Authority. Three meteorological parameters were analysed per month for the period 1990–1998 to include the intrauterine life of all study population subjects: i) air temperature; ii) rainfall amount; and iii) sunshine duration. Data were provided from the Institute of Environmental Research and Sustainable Development (IERSD). The decision to consider these parameters was based on the ability to be measured accurately/independently from potential confounders. Temporal analysis was based on dates of birth using three popular ‘specific’ tests as follows: Edwards' test (10), Hewitt's test [rank-sum (RS) method] (11) corrected by Rockenbauer (12) and Walter-Elwood's test (13). Data were analysed per month making adjustments to achieve exact month lengths in degrees. The February length was considered 28+2/8 days with adjustment for the total year to include 365+2/8 days (two leap years; 1992 and 1996). Considering this period as a circular unit, the accurate mean January duration is 31×360/365.25=30.55° (0–30.55°) and that for February is 28.25×360/365.25=27.84° (30.55–58.40°). Correction factors were used for Edwards' test to compute adjusted monthly frequencies (ni') for the variable population at risk. Based on ni', months were ranked from 12 (highest prevalence) down to 1 (lowest prevalence), to locate the six-month period of maximum prevalence by calculating maximum RS (11). RS ≥55 [or ≤23 (12)] was considered significant at the 5% level; Hewitt's test results were evaluated under the assumption that no prior hypothesis exists specifying the six-month period of higher expected prevalence (11). Considering data following a cyclic pattern described by a simple harmonic curve, assuming one peak/one trough of an annual cycle separated by a six-month interval, the SV magnitude was calculated using the amplitude (α) of the sinusoidal oscillation and the angle (time) of maximum/minimum prevalence (θmax/θmin). To examine data description adequacy by such a curve, expected monthly frequencies for Edwards' (EEi) and Walter-Elwood's test (EWi) were computed; EEi vs. ni' and EWi vs. ni' were compared using the χ2 goodness-of-fit test. Hewitt's test was applied independently to check Edwards' test application appropriateness. Walter-Elwood's test was used to unmask additional co-existing peaks. In addition, we also applied periodic regression, in which the underlying equation has a sinusoidal form. We fitted a sine curve to the ni' and we estimated 95% confidence interval (CI) for the peak to low ratios (9,14,15). Data were analysed using a Microsoft Excel application (Four Seasons Plus.xls) created and validated for the present study, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23.0 (IBM Corp.; Armonk, NY, USA) and R statistical package [R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/.]. A two-tailed value of P≤0.050 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

The mean, minimum and maximum values of air temperature were 17.8°C, 6.7°C (December 1991) and 29.8°C (July and August 1998). The respective values of rainfall amounts were: 30.2 mm, 0 mm (1990: June, July; 1991: June, September; 1992: August, September; 1993: June, July, September, October; 1994: August, September; 1996: June, July; 1997: July; 1998: July, August) and 184.7 mm (November 1998). The respective values of sunshine duration were 237.0 h, 62.9 h (January 1996) and 406.2 h (July 1998). The meteorological parameters presented SV annually and collectively through the study period with strong pairwise association (air temperature-sunshine duration, air temperature-rainfall amount, sunshine duration-rainfall amount: Pearson's r=0.95, −0.88 and −0.93, respectively; P<0.001). Spectral analysis performed on HB to detect potential periodic patterns revealed a trend towards a sinusoidal annual periodicity (Fig. 1). The monthly HB frequency distribution is shown in Table I. Edwards' test yielded maximum prevalence in late October (θmax = 294.60°)/minimum in late April (θmin = 114.60°) (X22=7.92; P<0.020). The hypothesised simple harmonic curve that observed frequencies were fitted on had an amplitude of α=0.171. There was insignificant departure of adjusted frequencies from the curve (X211=13.24; P>0.200). Rockenbauer-corrected Hewitt's test (12) indicated significantly more HB from August to January (Table I; maximum RS=55; P=0.004). Walter-Elwood's test yielded similar results: sole peak in mid-October (θmax = 288.40°)/sole trough in mid-April (θmin = 108.40°) (X22=8.85; P<0.020) (Fig. 2). The amplitude of the expected frequency curve was 0.168. The expected frequency curve revealed significantly greater rates in autumn. No significant departure of observed frequencies from the fitted simple harmonic curve were detected (13.64, P>0.200) (Fig. 3).
Figure 1.

Periodogram of the adjusted monthly frequencies of hypospadiac births (ni') revealing a trend towards a sinusoidal annual periodicity. Sinusoidal periodic components are shown as single peaks. An annual component implies a peak at a frequency of 0.083 (each of the data points in the time series represents a month; an annual periodicity corresponds to a period of 12 in the current data set i.e., a frequency of 1/12=0.083).

Table I.

Hypospadias: Data from the Greek population (1991–1998).

Expected frequencies

Month of birthTotal male live births (mi)Observed frequencies of hypospadiac births[a] (ni)Adjusted frequencies of hypospadiac births[a] (ni')Rank order of months (based on adjusted frequencies)[b](EEi)(EWi)
January  33,346  4648.51046.443.2
February  31,423  4348.1  842.637.4
March  33,851  4445.7  439.437.5
April  33,338  2425.3  137.635.7
May  36,261  3332.0  237.939.5
June  35,167  4747.0  540.140.9
July  39,001  4641.5  343.749.5
August  37,144  6662.51247.851.2
September  36,346  5048.4  951.153.2
October  36,526  4947.1  652.854.8
November  34,060  4647.5  752.450.3
December  34,712  4848.61150.148.7
Total421,17554254278542542

Adjusted frequencies are taken in order to adjust Edwards' test for a variable population at risk. They are calculated by the formula ni' = c ni Σmi/k mi, where c is a scale factor such that Σni'=Σni and k is the number of the sectors in which the given time span (one year) is divided (i.e., k = 12 here) EEi are proportional to [1 + α Cos (θi - θmax)], and Ewi are proportional to {mi [1 + α Cos (θi-θmax)]}. EEi, expected frequencies for Edwards' test; Ewi, expected frequencies for Walter-Elwood's test.

Months are ranked from 12 (highest prevalence) to 1 (lowest prevalence) for the calculation of the maximum rank sum (RS) that locates the period of 6 consecutive months showing the maximum prevalence (here: RS=55 for August-January).

Figure 2.

Walter-Elwood's model in hypospadias: data from the Greek population (1991–1998).

Figure 3.

Observed frequencies fitted into the simple harmonic curve given by Walter Elwood's test. Evaluation of the adequacy of data description with χ2 goodness-of-fit test.

Periodic regression confirmed the results yielded by Edwards' and Walter-Elwood's tests. The estimate for the relative risk (RR; maximum over minimum probability of having the event across seasons) was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.10–1.78; P=0.022) with a peak at 288° (95% CI using the normal approximation, 248–328°), namely at mid-October (95% CI, early-September-late November).

Discussion

The investigation of seasonality is used for the basic aetiological description of congenital malformations. If there are SV in the prevalence of a malformation, then these should be shown by adequate analysis; these should occur mostly in non-tropical areas where seasons are well defined (16). Specific statistical tools have been developed in the past for the investigation of seasonality in congenital malformations. Modern methods for the analysis of this type of data have also been recently developed, such as regression analysis supplemented by sine and cosine functions (17) and periodic regression (9,14,15). We opted to use these ‘old tests’, in order for our study to be potentially comparable in terms of methodology with the vast majority of studies in the field, which were published many years ago. Nevertheless, we also applied ‘modern techniques’ (periodic regression) to ensure the validity of our results (9,14,15). Among the ‘old tests’, Edwards' test occupies a central place in such analyses. It neglects variations in population at risk, possibly responsible for the apparent seasonality in the prevalence (e.g., due to variability in total births among months), assuming equal time intervals. Walter and Elwood's generalization (13) overcomes these limitations, considering variation in the population at risk. Edwards' method has been criticised to be sensitive to cyclic variations not of simple harmonic form (18). Hewitt's test (11), later corrected by Rockenbauer (12), detects simple harmonic patterns being more critical to meandering and distinguishes harmonic from non-harmonic variations, but lacks the power of parametric methods for moderate sample sizes and does not estimate curve parameters (13). The most effective means to study seasonality is to perform Edwards' and Hewitt's tests independently (11,19). The results of Hewitt's test should be evaluated under the assumption that no prior hypothesis exists specifying the six-month period of higher expected prevalence. The result is significant if RS ≥55 (or ≤23; Rockenbauer's correction). Only defects yielding significant results by independently applying both tests are regarded of definite harmonic behavior. Discordance between the Edwards' test/RS method makes findings difficult to interpret (20). Apart from the ‘specific’ tools for detecting seasonality, the use of χ2 of heterogeneity across k time periods [e.g., 12 months of the year (k=12) in our study] could be considered. However, the power of Edwards' test is higher (19). This tool was used in the past, but has been abandoned nowadays and, if ever used, it is obligatorily supplemented by a ‘specific’ statistical tool, since the results produced cannot be unequivocally accepted; significant results do not necessarily imply a seasonal pattern, insignificant results cannot rule out a seasonal pattern. We conducted a systematic literature search up to November 16, 2016, using Medline, in an attempt to detect all relevant reports published to date, and we tried to compare their results with ours. No temporal, regional, publication status or language restrictions were set. The search included the following keywords: hypospadias, epidemiology, prevalence, season, month, birth, variation and time-series, in all relevant combinations, as well as a complete separate literature search strategy (LSS) as follows: [hypospadias AND (epidemiology OR prevalence OR season OR month OR birth OR variation OR time-series); filter: human]. The reference lists of selected reports were further reviewed for relevance. Methodologically non-focused reports on the seasonality of hypospadias i.e., reports on monthly hypospadiac prevalence (21) or season of birth (22) among other risk factors, were not taken into consideration. The included reports in chronological order of publication and the main results are summarised in Table II (7–9,16,18,19,23–37).
Table II.

Seasonal variations in hypospadias: Review of the literature in chronological order.

Author (Ref.)YearPeriod under studyStudy based on LMP/MBHypospadiac casesCountryMaximum incidence rateMinimum incidence rateStatistical testχ2 RSP-value
Slater et al (34)19641954–1960MB236Great Britain (England and Wales)χ2(1df)NS
Bailo et al (24)19661942–1964LMP214ItalyMarch-AugustSeptember-Februaryχ2(1df)1.794NS
Theander (36)19701951–1965MB124Swedenχ2(11df)NS
July-SeptemberOctober-Decemberχ2(3 df)<0.05
April-SeptemberOctober-Marchχ2(1df)<0.01
Wehrung and Hay (18)19701962–1965MB5145USA (entire country)AprilOctoberEdwards7.59<0.05
Chen and Woolley (26)19711961–1967MB50USA (Michigan)April-JuneJuly-Septemberχ2 (3df)2.79NS
Roberts et al (19)19721964–1966LMP102Great Britain (South Wales)NovemberMayEdwards14.125<0.001
August-JanuaryFebruary-JulyHewitt55<0.05
Campbell et al (25)19731967–1971MB5886Great Britain (England and Wales)NS
Trichopoulos et al (37)19731955–1965MB145GreeceOctoberAprilEdwardsNS
HewittNS
Harlap and Davis (28)19731964–1973MB178Israel (Jerusalem)Spring/AutumnWinter/SummerFourier analysis<0.025
(two peaks)(two troughs)Fourier analysis
Record and Armstrong (33)19731950–1959MB314Great Britain (Birmingham)χ2(11df)6.4NS
1963–1972
Sweet et al (35)19741940–1970LMP and MB113USA (Rochester)EdwardsNS
Avellan (7)19771957–1969LMP and MB299Swedenχ2(1, 3, 11 df)NS
MBJuneDecemberEdwards<0.01
LMPAugustFebruaryEdwards<0.05
LMP and MB673χ2(1, 3, 11 df)NS
LMP and MBEdwardsNS
Czeizel et al (27)19791970–1972MB410HungaryAugust-JanuaryFebruary-JulyHewittS
EdwardsNS
χ2NS
Monteleone Neto et al (31)19811967–1975MB153ArgentinaOctoberAprilEdwardsNS
July-DecemberJanuary-JuneHewitt50<0.05
50BrazilJuly-DecemberJanuary-JuneHewitt51<0.03
42, 38, 35Chile, Uruguay, VenezuelaHewittNS
324South America (total)NovemberMayEdwards6.65<0.05
October-DecemberApril-Juneχ2(3 df)8.26<0.05
HewittNS
Angerpointner (23)19841970–1979MB515GermanyApril/MayOctober/NovemberEdwards<0.05
December-MayJune-NovemberHewitt<0.007
Leung et al (30)1985
Calzolari et al (8)19861978–1983MB168ItalyNS
Källén et al (29)19861980–1982MB546ItalyOctoberMayEdwards7.5<0.05
January-JuneJuly-DecemberHewitt (modified by Rockenbauer)29NS
1976–1982MB602SpainEdwards0.8NS
April-SeptemberOctober-MarchHewitt (modified by Rockenbauer)29NS
1973–1981MB1870SwedenMarchEdwards3.1NS
November-AprilMay-OctoberHewitt (modified by Rockenbauer)25<0.05
1973–1981MB781DenmarkEdwards1.6NS
March-AugustSeptember-FebruaryHewitt (modified by Rockenbauer)27NS
1970–1981MB3640HungaryEdwards0.2NS
April-SeptemberOctober-MarchHewitt (modified by Rockenbauer)29NS
1967–1979MBSouth America (tropical)Edwards1.7NS
October-MarchApril-SeptemberHewitt (modified by Rockenbauer)30NS
1967–1979MBSouth America (non-tropical)Edwards2.7NS
November-AprilMay-OctoberHewitt (modified by Rockenbauer)30NS
1967–1979MB626South America (total)Edwards6.3<0.05
April-SeptemberOctober-MarchHewitt (modified by Rockenbauer)26<0.05
1977–1982MB57MexicoEdwards0.4NS
March-AugustSeptember-FebruaryHewitt (modified by Rockenbauer)32NS
Castilla et al (16)19901982–1986MB143South America (tropical)MayNovemberWalter and Elwood0.9NS
1982–1986MB443South America (non-tropical)AprilOctoberWalter and Elwood1.6NS
1981–1984MB867ItalyNovemberMayWalter and Elwood4.6NS
Nazer et al (32)19921969–1990MB103ChileJuly-DecemberJanuary-JuneFourier analysisNS
Skriver et al (9)  20041983–2002MB3242DenmarkNovemberDecemberPeriodic regressionNS

LMP, last menstrual period; MB, month of birth; RS: rank-sum; NS, not significant; S, significant.

The literature search revealed a marked paucity of data during the past decade. The LSS run, filtered for the past 10 years, yielded 577 reports; none however met the criteria set for being taken into consideration in the present study. The seasonality of hypospadias has therefore been studied worldwide, particularly in the past, which facilitates the comparability of our results in terms of a relative closer accrual period of time (1991–1998). Results have been however conflicting (Table II) (7–9,16,18,19,23–37). Some authors found significant variations with respect to MB or the last menstrual period (LMP) (7,18,19,23,27–29,31,36,38), whereas others did not (8,9,16,24–26,30,32–35,37). Our analysis was based on MB. When malformed infants have a markedly shorter gestational length than normal ones, the study on MB can be skewed by seasonality in total births. It would be more correct to study seasonality in conceptions (LMPs), although this is often impossible. For hypospadias, this ‘error’ is minor and it is better to study MB to obtain more reliable data (29). Pre-term delivery has been reported as a risk factor (31,32,35). Others have not observed differences in gestational length between normal/hypospadiac infants (27,38). Low birth weight is possibly associated with hypospadias (7,26,27,29,31,35). It has been shown that the risk associated with low gestational age is attributed to the association between gestational weeks (GW) and low birth weight. We noted that HB follow a simple harmonic type pattern (both Edwards' and RS test gave significant results). The literature review revealed a number of studies suffering from serious limitations. Results based exclusively on χ2-of-heterogeneity (24,26,33,34,36) cannot be unequivocally accepted. Results based exclusively on Edwards' test (7,18,35) are questioned. Our results are methodologically comparable with six reports only (19,23,29,31,37,38). Three of them evaluated the significance of Hewitt's test results using loose criteria and interpretation is troublesome (23,29,31). According to Hewitt (11), it is appropriate to distinguish the situation in which a prior hypothesis specifying the six-month period of higher expected incidence is available for testing, from that in which the likely nature of any seasonality has to be inferred from the data. Values of the test criterion ≥50 (later corrected by Rockenbauer to 52) and ≥55 should be considered significant at the conventional 5% level for the former and the later situation, respectively (12). Angerpointner (23) detected a seasonal pattern (peak between April/May) by performing both Edwards' and Hewitt's test. RS was not stated, but the result was considered statistically significant (P<0.007). However, P<0.007 corresponds to RS = 54 for a pre-assigned segment of six months (11). Thus, the result should not have been considered significant. Källén et al (29) and Monteleone Neto et al (31) considered Hewitt's test result significant if RS ≥52 (or ≤26: Hewitt's modified test) and RS ≥50, respectively without testing a particular pre-existing hypothesis for a given six-month period of higher expected prevalence. Therefore, seasonality has not been documented for any country under investigation in these studies (11,12). In a previous Greek study (37), no significant pattern was detected by Edwards' or Hewitt's test. Nevertheless, Edwards' criterion indicated an identical peak to ours (mid-October). During an 11-year period (1955–1965), 38,623 live and stillborn male infants were born at Alexandra University Maternity Hospital, Athens. There were 145 hypospadiac cases (prevalence ~0.375%). Total male live-births during this period were 875,672. Based on these figures, we estimated that ~3,284 hypospadiac cases were born during 1955–1965. Therefore, the study was based on ~4.5% of the total sample. With the reservation that the prevalence of hypospadias has remained relatively constant in Greece over the past decades (secular trends of hypospadias in Greece have not been investigated yet), it is estimated that our sample size covered ~34.3% of hypospadiac cases born in Greece during this period. Edwards' test power, given our sample size/SV magnitude (α=0.171), is estimated at ~70% at the 5% (20), whereas the test power in the previous Greek study (37) is estimated at ~30% (underpowered). Mediterranean countries, with a similar climate to Greece such as Italy and Spain, failed to detect any seasonal patterns. Considering a direct (e.g., daylight, temperature)/indirect (e.g., diet influenced by temperature) seasonal effect, one would expect similarity to our results. However, the detected trend was moderate (α=0.171). Even with a sample size of 34.3%, the chance for detection was limited (70%). Possibly, previous analyses (16,29) were hampered by small sample sizes. In Italy, both studies concluded that October (29) and November (16) had the highest birth prevalence, with the former yielding significance, which cannot be unequivocally accepted. SV was also reported in Spain (29). The reported peak (April) in non-tropical South America (16) is consistent with our results (southern hemisphere; 6-month difference in phase). In Scandinavia, the lowest HB prevalence was also observed in spring (29). These interesting, yet statistically insignificant results warrant further investigation. The strict use of tools designed for the investigation of seasonality in congenital malformations, makes our results directly comparable with two reports only (19,38), concluding that hypospadiac conceptions in South Wales follow a temporal pattern described by a simple harmonic curve (χ2Edward s= 14.125, RS = 55; peak in November). Our results are compatible with the observation of a higher prevalence of hypospadiac conceptions in winter, since the LMP of a woman delivering in October is usually in January. To explain the winter peak, the authors proposed that SV in daylight length may act detrimentally during the third phase of organogenesis (growth of genitalia between 12–16 GW) via alterations to maternal pineal gland function, causing alterations to melatonin secretion that may influence maternal pituitary, ovarian hormonal activity/hormonal balances with a negative effect on fetal testicular androgen production (theory of light) (19,38). Meteorological data derived from small countries, such as Greece are usually less disputable due to robustness throughout the country. The parameters investigated varied seasonally (maximal sunlight-temperature in summer/minimal in winter, maximal rainfall in winter/minimal in summer) and were strongly associated. Therefore, the theory of light (19,38) cannot be rejected; however, a negative effect of low temperature or high rainfall can also be considered plausible. Although the theory of light cannot be directly rejected, it seems inappropriate to explain our results. The identical pattern observed in Greece and Wales and potentially in other Northern European countries, implies that seasonal differences in daylight length do not play an important role in the pathogenesis of hypospadias, since these countries are characterised by more prominent differences in daylight length among seasons compared to Greece. Furthermore, a study investigating SV of cryptorchidism in Greece, provided evidence against the theory of light (39). A role of low winter temperature via a decrease in maternal serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) profiles at the beginning of the androgen-dependent inguinoscrotal phase of testicular descent (26th GW) was proposed to explain the peak observed in March (39). Considering the significantly increased prevalence of HB in October, it appears that the coincidence of the beginning of the 8th GW, with late winter is associated with increased hypospadiac prevalence. The hCG peak, Leydig cell development, androgen receptor expression, testosterone secretion, dehydrotestosterone (DHT) formation and genitalia differentiation, all begin during 8th-9th GW (40). Low temperatures during that period may be related to urethral folds failure to fuse during subsequent weeks, leading to hypospadias. During the differentiation of male genital tract, placental hCG stimulates fetal testicular androgen production. The hCG peak starting at the 8th GW just precedes the beginning of Leydig cell formation, testosterone secretion and DHT conversion (9th GW) (40). A decline in hCG secretion by the 18th GW follows, by which fetal pituitary gonadotropin production is mainly responsible for future testicular stimulation. Since normal urethral development is androgen-dependent, it appears that low temperatures at the 8th GW are accompanied by a decrease in maternal hCG profiles detrimentally affecting subsequent embryonic Leydig cell secretory function/androgen production. Others have shown that maternal hCG during early pregnancy is significantly lower in winter compared to summer (41). The decreased embryonic Leydig cell secretory function may result in increased hypospadiac prevalence. This hypothesis is supported by the decreased prevalence in April. Our results revealed that the occurrence of the 8th GW in August is accompanied by a decreased hypospadiac prevalence. It may be suggested that high temperatures at the 8th GW do not influence maternal/fetal hormonal profiles/balances with overall result a minimal disturbance on of urethral folds fusion in the following weeks. This hypothesis is set for the first time and could explain results not only in parts of Southern Europe, such as Greece and possibly Italy, but also in Northern Europe (Wales) and perhaps in other continents too (non-tropical South America) (Table II) (7–9,16,18,19,23–37). Furthermore, it is consistent with previous findings on the seasonal pattern of cryptorchid births in Greece (39). It seems that hypospadiac and cryptorchid births follow consistent seasonal patterns characterised by the coincidence of the beginning of the two fetal testicular androgen-dependent periods crucial for the normal differentiation of human male external genitalia and the inguinoscrotal phase of testicular descent (8th and 26th GW, respectively) with months of lower temperature (winter period). This hypothesis may also be consistent with the concept of testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS) (42). Relatively lower levels of placental hCG during winter acting upon a dysgenetic testis (borderline Leydig cell function) possibly result in disproportionally lower androgen production. If these relatively lower placental hCG levels are observed earlier or later in gestation (8–9th or 26th GW) hypospadias or cryptorchidism may develop, respectively. The presence of TDS symptoms may vary with severity of the underlying testicular dysgenesis. In mild forms, the restoration of hCG levels during months of higher temperature results to either normal penis formation or fully descended testes. In severe forms (severely suffering Leydig cell), low androgen production is independent of hCG levels and the final result will possibly be the combination of hypospadias and cryptorchidism. Nevertheless, further research is warranted in order such a hypothesis to be established. In conclusion, HB prevalence follows a simple harmonic seasonal pattern and is associated with that of cryptorchidism in Greece. The coincidence of the first or third trimester of a potentially genetically influenced gestation with winter may lead to the phenotypic expression of hypospadias or cryptorchidism, respectively. The potential role of a cyclic-varied androgen-production stimulator, such as hCG may be speculated. The seasonality of a common environmental factor may contribute to these seasonal patterns and possibly to a common pathogenesis of these two congenital malformations.
  41 in total

1.  Studying seasonality by using sine and cosine functions in regression analysis.

Authors:  A M Stolwijk; H Straatman; G A Zielhuis
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  SEASONAL VARIATION IN CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES. PRELIMINARY REPORT OF A SURVEY CONDUCTED BY THE RESEARCH COMMITTEE OF COUNCIL OF THE COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS.

Authors:  B C SLATER; G I WATSON; J C MCDONALD
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1964-01

3.  Epidemiology of simple hypospadias.

Authors:  H Campbell; R G Newcombe; J A Weatherall
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-07-07

4.  Epidemiology of simple hypospadias.

Authors:  R G Record; E Armstrong
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-07-28

5.  Observations on the epidemiology of simple hypospadias.

Authors:  C J Roberts; S Lloyd
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-03-31

6.  Seasonal distribution of births of boys with anomalies of the urethra.

Authors:  G Theander
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1970

7.  On aetiological factors in hypospadias.

Authors:  L Avellán
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1977

8.  Maternal serum human chorionic gonadotrophin during early pregnancy resulting in boys with hypospadias or cryptorchidism.

Authors:  E A Kiely; R S Chapman; S K Bajoria; J S Hollyer; R Hurley
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1995-09

9.  Prevalence and risk factors of hypospadias in a private hospital in northeast iran.

Authors:  Ashraf Mohammadzadeh; Ahmadshah Farhat; Habibollah Esmaieli; Soozan Shiranzaei
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.364

10.  Epidemiology of hypospadias in Europe: a registry-based study.

Authors:  Jorieke E H Bergman; Maria Loane; Martine Vrijheid; Anna Pierini; Rien J M Nijman; Marie-Claude Addor; Ingeborg Barisic; Judit Béres; Paula Braz; Judith Budd; Virginia Delaney; Miriam Gatt; Babak Khoshnood; Kari Klungsøyr; Carmen Martos; Carmel Mullaney; Vera Nelen; Amanda J Neville; Mary O'Mahony; Annette Queisser-Luft; Hanitra Randrianaivo; Anke Rissmann; Catherine Rounding; David Tucker; Diana Wellesley; Natalya Zymak-Zakutnia; Marian K Bakker; Hermien E K de Walle
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Association of pesticide exposure with human congenital abnormalities.

Authors:  Charikleia Kalliora; Charalampos Mamoulakis; Eleni Vasilopoulos; George A Stamatiades; Lydia Kalafati; Roza Barouni; Triantafyllia Karakousi; Mohammad Abdollahi; Aristidis Tsatsakis
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  THE POTENTIAL OF DIETHYLHEXYL-PHTHALATE AND GENISTEIN TO INDUCE TESTICULAR CHANGES IN RAT'S OFFSPRING.

Authors:  K Li; R Wang; R Duan; Y Liu
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.877

Review 3.  Endocrine Disruptors Acting on Estrogen and Androgen Pathways Cause Reproductive Disorders through Multiple Mechanisms: A Review.

Authors:  Saira Amir; Syed Tahir Abbas Shah; Charalampos Mamoulakis; Anca Oana Docea; Olga-Ioanna Kalantzi; Athanasios Zachariou; Daniela Calina; Felix Carvalho; Nikolaos Sofikitis; Antonios Makrigiannakis; Aristidis Tsatsakis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.