Elsie M Taveras1,2, Richard Marshall3, Mona Sharifi4, Earlene Avalon5, Lauren Fiechtner1,6, Christine Horan1, Monica W Gerber1, E John Orav7, Sarah N Price1, Thomas Sequist8, Daniel Slater3. 1. Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston. 2. Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Section of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 5. Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 8. Partners HealthCare System Inc, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Novel approaches to care delivery that leverage clinical and community resources could improve body mass index (BMI) and family-centered outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which 2 clinical-community interventions improved child BMI z score and health-related quality of life, as well as parental resource empowerment in the Connect for Health Trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 2-arm, blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 2014 through March 2016, with measures at baseline and 1 year after randomization. This intent-to-treat analysis included 721 children ages 2 to 12 years with BMI in the 85th or greater percentile from 6 primary care practices in Massachusetts. INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomized to 1 of 2 arms: (1) enhanced primary care (eg, flagging of children with BMI ≥ 85th percentile, clinical decision support tools for pediatric weight management, parent educational materials, a Neighborhood Resource Guide, and monthly text messages) or (2) enhanced primary care plus contextually tailored, individual health coaching (twice-weekly text messages and telephone or video contacts every other month) to support behavior change and linkage of families to neighborhood resources. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: One-year changes in age- and sex-specific BMI z score, child health-related quality of life measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life 4.0, and parental resource empowerment. RESULTS: At 1 year, we obtained BMI z scores from 664 children (92%) and family-centered outcomes from 657 parents (91%). The baseline mean (SD) age was 8.0 (3.0) years; 35% were white (n = 252), 33.3% were black (n = 240), 21.8% were Hispanic (n = 157), and 9.9% were of another race/ethnicity (n = 71). In the enhanced primary care group, adjusted mean (SD) BMI z score was 1.91 (0.56) at baseline and 1.85 (0.58) at 1 year, an improvement of -0.06 BMI z score units (95% CI, -0.10 to -0.02) from baseline to 1 year. In the enhanced primary care plus coaching group, the adjusted mean (SD) BMI z score was 1.87 (0.56) at baseline and 1.79 (0.58) at 1 year, an improvement of -0.09 BMI z score units (95% CI, -0.13 to -0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 intervention arms (difference, -0.02; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.03; P = .39). Both intervention arms led to improved parental resource empowerment: 0.29 units (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.35) higher in the enhanced primary care group and 0.22 units (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.28) higher in the enhanced primary care plus coaching group. Parents in the enhanced primary care plus coaching group, but not in the enhanced care alone group, reported improvements in their child's health-related quality of life (1.53 units; 95% CI, 0.51 to 2.56). However, there were no significant differences between the intervention arms in either parental resource empowerment (0.07 units; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.16) or child health-related quality of life (0.89 units; 95% CI, -0.56 to 2.33). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Two interventions that included a package of high-quality clinical care for obesity and linkages to community resources resulted in improved family-centered outcomes for childhood obesity and improvements in child BMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02124460.
IMPORTANCE: Novel approaches to care delivery that leverage clinical and community resources could improve body mass index (BMI) and family-centered outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which 2 clinical-community interventions improved child BMI z score and health-related quality of life, as well as parental resource empowerment in the Connect for Health Trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 2-arm, blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 2014 through March 2016, with measures at baseline and 1 year after randomization. This intent-to-treat analysis included 721 children ages 2 to 12 years with BMI in the 85th or greater percentile from 6 primary care practices in Massachusetts. INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomized to 1 of 2 arms: (1) enhanced primary care (eg, flagging of children with BMI ≥ 85th percentile, clinical decision support tools for pediatric weight management, parent educational materials, a Neighborhood Resource Guide, and monthly text messages) or (2) enhanced primary care plus contextually tailored, individual health coaching (twice-weekly text messages and telephone or video contacts every other month) to support behavior change and linkage of families to neighborhood resources. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: One-year changes in age- and sex-specific BMI z score, child health-related quality of life measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life 4.0, and parental resource empowerment. RESULTS: At 1 year, we obtained BMI z scores from 664 children (92%) and family-centered outcomes from 657 parents (91%). The baseline mean (SD) age was 8.0 (3.0) years; 35% were white (n = 252), 33.3% were black (n = 240), 21.8% were Hispanic (n = 157), and 9.9% were of another race/ethnicity (n = 71). In the enhanced primary care group, adjusted mean (SD) BMI z score was 1.91 (0.56) at baseline and 1.85 (0.58) at 1 year, an improvement of -0.06 BMI z score units (95% CI, -0.10 to -0.02) from baseline to 1 year. In the enhanced primary care plus coaching group, the adjusted mean (SD) BMI z score was 1.87 (0.56) at baseline and 1.79 (0.58) at 1 year, an improvement of -0.09 BMI z score units (95% CI, -0.13 to -0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 intervention arms (difference, -0.02; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.03; P = .39). Both intervention arms led to improved parental resource empowerment: 0.29 units (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.35) higher in the enhanced primary care group and 0.22 units (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.28) higher in the enhanced primary care plus coaching group. Parents in the enhanced primary care plus coaching group, but not in the enhanced care alone group, reported improvements in their child's health-related quality of life (1.53 units; 95% CI, 0.51 to 2.56). However, there were no significant differences between the intervention arms in either parental resource empowerment (0.07 units; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.16) or child health-related quality of life (0.89 units; 95% CI, -0.56 to 2.33). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Two interventions that included a package of high-quality clinical care for obesity and linkages to community resources resulted in improved family-centered outcomes for childhood obesity and improvements in child BMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02124460.
Authors: Mia A Papas; Anthony J Alberg; Reid Ewing; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Tiffany L Gary; Ann C Klassen Journal: Epidemiol Rev Date: 2007-05-28 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Hannah G Lawman; Cheryl D Fryar; Deanna Kruszon-Moran; Brian K Kit; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elsie M Taveras; Richard Marshall; Mona Sharifi; Earlene Avalon; Lauren Fiechtner; Christine Horan; John Orav; Sarah N Price; Thomas Sequist; Daniel Slater Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Susanna Wiegand; Klaus-Michael Keller; Thomas Lob-Corzilius; Wilfried Pott; Thomas Reinehr; Markus Röbl; Rainer Stachow; Sabine Tuschy; Ingo Weidanz; Kurt Widhalm; Martina de Zwaan; Reinhard W Holl Journal: Horm Res Paediatr Date: 2014-12-20 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Lauren Fiechtner; Jason Block; Dustin T Duncan; Matthew W Gillman; Steven L Gortmaker; Steven J Melly; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Elsie M Taveras Journal: Prev Med Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Mona Sharifi; Gareth Marshall; Richard Marshall; Clement Bottino; Roberta Goldman; Thomas Sequist; Elsie M Taveras Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2013
Authors: Dustin T Duncan; Mona Sharifi; Steven J Melly; Richard Marshall; Thomas D Sequist; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Elsie M Taveras Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Lori Pbert; Michelle Trivedi; Susan Druker; Jennifer Bram; Barbara Olendzki; Sybil Crawford; Christine Frisard; Victoria Andersen; Molly E Waring; Karen Clements; Kristin Schneider; Alan C Geller Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 2.226