Literature DB >> 28586723

Validation of liquid and gaseous calibration techniques for quantification of propofol in breath with sorbent tube Thermal Desorption System GC-MS.

Felix Maurer1, Martin Geiger2, Thomas Volk2, Daniel I Sessler3, Sascha Kreuer2.   

Abstract

Plasma concentrations of intravenous drugs cannot currently be evaluated in real time to guide clinical dosing. However, a system for estimating plasma concentration of the anesthetic propofol from exhaled breath may soon be available. Developing reliable calibration and analytical validation techniques is thus necessary. We therefore compared the established sorbent tube liquid injection technique with a gas injection procedure using a reference gas generator. We then quantified propofol with Tenax sorbent tubes in combination with gas-chromatography coupled mass spectrometry in the breath of 15 patients (101 measurements). Over the clinically relevant concentration range from 10 to 50 ppbv, coefficient of determination was 0.995 for gas calibration; and over the range from 10 to 100ng, coefficient of determination was 0.996 for liquid calibration. A regression comparing gas to liquid calibration had a coefficient of determination of 0.89; slope 1.05±0.01 (standard deviation). The limit of detection was 0.74ng and the lower limit of quantification was 1.12ng for liquid; the limit of detection was 0.90 ppbv and the lower limit of quantification was 1.36 ppbv for gas. Loaded sorbent tubes were stable for at least 14days without significant propofol loss as determined with either method. Measurements from liquid or gas samples were comparably suitable for evaluation of patient breath samples.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breath analysis; Calibration gas generator; Gas chromatography–mass selective detector; Propofol; Tenax tubes; Volatile drugs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28586723     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.05.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal        ISSN: 0731-7085            Impact factor:   3.935


  2 in total

1.  Rapid determination and continuous monitoring of propofol in microliter whole blood sample during anesthesia by paper spray ionization-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Xiao-Hui Zhang; Wei-Dong Mi; Ying-Lin Zhou; Chang-Sheng Zhang; Xin-Xiang Zhang
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Stability of Propofol (2,6-Diisopropylphenol) in Thermal Desorption Tubes during Air Transport.

Authors:  Felix Maurer; Martin Geiger; Thomas Volk; Daniel I Sessler; Sascha Kreuer; Tobias Hüppe
Journal:  Int J Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 1.885

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.