Literature DB >> 28586495

Meta-analysis of the FDA Reports on Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the Three Latest Platforms for LASIK.

Majid Moshirfar, Tirth J Shah, David Franklin Skanchy, Steve H Linn, Daniel S Durrie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of the three latest U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved lasers on patient-reported outcomes after LASIK.
METHODS: In this meta-analysis of patient-reported FDA data, an aggregated total of 718 eyes undergoing LASIK using VISX iDesign (Abbott Medical Optics Manufacturing, Milpitas, CA), Alcon Contoura (Alcon Research, Ltd., Fort Worth, TX), and Nidek CATz (Nidek Co. Ltd., Gamagori, Japan) lasers were evaluated for overall changes in visual symptoms postoperatively. Statistical significance was calculated when appropriate to assess changes. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: At 12 months following LASIK, there was a decrease in the postoperative difficulty driving at night (29%) with respect to preoperative values. There was a significant postoperative reduction in prior moderate to severe symptoms for light sensitivity (9%), difficulty driving at night (22%), reading difficulty (8%), double vision (2%), glare (12%), and halos (6%) at 12 months following LASIK.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the FDA data shows that modern lasers have significantly improved patient-reported visual outcomes after LASIK. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(6):362-368.]. Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28586495     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20161221-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  7 in total

1.  Initial Single-Site Surgical Experience with SMILE: A Comparison of Results to FDA SMILE, and the Earliest and Latest Generation of LASIK.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Michael S Murri; Tirth J Shah; Steven H Linn; Yasmyne Ronquillo; Orry C Birdsong; Phillips C Hoopes
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2018-06-29

2.  Comparison of outcomes of laser refractive surgery (LRS) alone and LRS with laser asymmetric keratectomy in patients with myopia: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Ji Sang Min; Byung Moo Min
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Ocular Pain Symptoms in Individuals With and Without a History of Refractive Surgery: Results From a Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Brandon S Baksh; Melina Morkin; Elizabeth Felix; Carol L Karp; Anat Galor
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.152

4.  Comparison of outcomes after topography-modified refraction versus wavefront-optimized versus manifest topography-guided LASIK.

Authors:  Jaeryung Kim; Sung-Ho Choi; Dong Hui Lim; Gil-Joong Yoon; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Reversal of Myopic Correction for Patients Intolerant to LASIK.

Authors:  Amr A Gab-Alla
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Patients' satisfaction and subjective happiness after refractive surgery for myopia.

Authors:  Shinichiro Matsuguma; Kazuno Negishi; Motoko Kawashima; Ikuko Toda; Masahiko Ayaki; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Patient-reported vision-related quality of life after laser in situ keratomileusis, surface ablation, and phakic intraocular lens: The 5.5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Osamu Hieda; Yo Nakamura; Koichi Wakimasu; Kiyoshi Yamamura; Yoshimi Suzukamo; Shigeru Kinoshita; Chie Sotozono
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.