Literature DB >> 28586402

Effect of food intake on 92 biomarkers for cardiovascular disease.

Magnus Dencker1, Ylva Gårdinger1, Ola Björgell1, Joanna Hlebowicz2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluates the effect of food intake on 92 biomarkers for cardiovascular disease (CVD).
METHODS: Twenty two healthy subjects (11 male and 11 female aged 25.9±4.2 years) were investigated. A total of 92 biomarkers were measured before a standardized meal as well as 30 and 120 minutes afterwards with the Proseek Multiplex CVD III kit.
RESULTS: The levels for eight biomarkers decreased significantly (P<0.05) 30 minutes after food intake. The levels for seven biomarkers remained significantly decreased 120 minutes after food intake. Nine biomarker decreased significantly at 120 minutes after food intake. The changes were between 4-30%, most commonly around 5%. Only six biomarkers showed a difference of 10% or more due to food intake. The biggest differences were observed for Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (30%); Azurocidin, Cystatin-B, and Myeloperoxidase (13%); Monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (11%); and Myeloblastin (10%), all 120 minutes after food intake.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that food intake affects several different CVD biomarkers, but the effect is predominantly modest. Timing of blood sampling in relation to food intake, therefore, appears not to be a major concern. Further studies are warranted in older healthy subjects and in patients with various cardiac diseases to determine whether the findings are reproducible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28586402      PMCID: PMC5460853          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the world. Current risk assessment systems are far from perfect [1,2]. There is a continuous search for novel biomarkers that could improve the risk assessment in CVD [3-9]. Digestion of food is known to have significant hemodynamic and metabolic effects [10-15], and may, therefore, affect different biomarkers. It is relevant from a practical point of view to investigate whether these biomarkers are affected by food intake, as the timing of blood sampling would then become relevant. Moreover, it could be of physiological interest to investigate biological responses to food intake. The present study evaluates the effect of food intake in healthy volunteers on 92 different emerging biomarkers for CVD. To the best our knowledge, this has not been done before.

Materials and methods

Study population

The study investigated 22 healthy Caucasians (11 male and 11 female, aged 25.9±4.2 years). None of the subjects had a prior history or showed any symptoms of cardiovascular disease or any other chronic diseases. None of the subjects were taking any cardiovascular medication. Height and weight were measured and BMI and body surface area [16] were calculated. The subjects ingested a standardized meal consisting of 300 g rice pudding (AXA Goda Gröten Risgrynsgröt; Lantmännen AXA, Järna, Sweden). The total caloric value of the meal was 330 kcal: 10% from protein (9 g), 58% from carbohydrates (48 g), and 32% from fat (12 g). Our ambition with the meal was to mimic a breakfast. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The trial is registered in the US National Library of Medicine with the trial registration number NCT01027507. The study was approved by the regional ethical review board in Lund, Sweden.

Blood samples

Blood samples were collected before the meal as well as 30 and 120 minutes afterwards and then frozen. No beverages were consumed during the experiment. One of the blood samples collected 30 minutes after the meal was defective and excluded from the analysis. The 91 biomarkers were analyzed by the Proximity Extension Assay technique using the Proseek Multiplex CVD III 96x96 reagents kit (Olink Bioscience, Uppsala, Sweden) as previously described [17,18]. Data are presented as arbitrary units (AU). Values can be transformed to actual concentrations using transformation algorithms on the Olink Bioscience website (www.olink.com). The conversion, however, is not exact. The vast majority of measurements for N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide failed to reach the detection level. The Proseek Multiplex CVD III kit has primarily been designed for heart failure with elevated N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide levels. The samples are therefore diluted 1:100, and this could explain why the vast majority of measurements for N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide failed to reach the detection level. The Proseek Multiplex Metabolism kit, where the samples are only diluted 1:10, were therefore used to detect the levels of N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (Olink Bioscience, Uppsala, Sweden). One sample for Matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein, three samples for Spondin-1, and four samples for Chitotriosidase-1 failed to reach detection levels. In these cases the values were set at the detection levels. The 92 biomarkers that were analyzed are as follows (intra- and inter-assay variation): Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 14 (8%,10%), Low-density lipoprotein receptor (8%,9%), Integrin beta-2 (8%,11%), Interle ukin-17 receptor A (8%,10%), Tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (8%,10%), Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (8%,12%), Ephrin type-B receptor 4 (8%,9%), Interleukin-2 receptor subunit alpha (8%,8%), Osteoprotegerin (8%,11%), CD166 antigen (7%,8%), Trefoil factor 3 (8%,9%), P-selectin (8%,10%), Cystatin-B (8%,9%), Monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (8%,12%), Scavenger receptor cysteine-rich type 1 protein M130 (7%,9%), Galectin-3 (8%,9%), Granulins (7%,11%), Matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein (9%,12%), Bleomycin hydrolase (8%,11%), Perlecan (7%,9%), Lymphotoxin-beta receptor (8%,10%), Neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 3 (9%,10%), Metalloproteinase inhibitor 4 (9%,12%), Contactin-1 (7%,9%), Cadherin-5 (11%,12%), Trem-like transcript 2 protein (8%,12%), Fatty acid-binding protein, adipocyte (8%,9%), Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (9%,12%), Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (8%,10%), C-C motif chemokine 24 (9%,13%), Transferrin receptor protein 1 (6%,9%), Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 10C (7%,10%), Growth/differentiation factor 15 (9%,11%), E-selectin (7%,10%), Azurocidin (7%,8%), Protein delta homolog 1 (8%,11%), Spondin-1 (8%,12%), Myeloperoxidase (7%,8%), C-X-C motif chemokine 16 (9%,12%), Interleukin-6 receptor subunit alpha (8%,9%), Resistin (7%,13%), Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (8%,10%), Chitotriosidase-1 (8%,11%), Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5 (7%,10%), C-C motif chemikine 22 (8%,15%), Pulmonary surfactant-associated protein D (9%,9%), Elafin (8%,13%), Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (8%,11%), Aminopeptidase N (7%,8%), Tyrosine-protein kinase receptor UFO (8%,11%), Interleukin-1 receptor type 1 (8%,10%), Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (9%,13%), Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 6 (8%,12%), Myoglobin (8%,15%), Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13B (8%,12%), Myeloblastin (8%,14%), Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (10%,25%), Urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor (8%,10%), Osteopontin (8%,11%), Cathepsin D (7%,10%), Peptidoglycan recognition protein 1 (8%,12%), Carboxypeptidase A1 (7%,10%), Junctional adhesion molecule A (8%,11%), Galectin-4 (8%,10%), Interleukin-1 receptor type 2 (8%,10%), Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type substrate 1 (8%,9%), C-C motif chemokine 15 (9%,15%), Caspase-3 (9%,16%), Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (8%,14%), Carboxypeptidase B (7%,12%), Chitinase-3-like protein 1 (8%,10%), ST2 protein (8%,10%), Tissue-type plasminogen activator (9%,16%), Secretoglobin family 3A member 2 (10%,22%), Epidermal growth factor receptor (7%,10%), Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (9%,13%), Complement component C1q receptor (8%,11%), Interleukin-18-binding protein (8%,10%), Collagen alpha-1(I) chain (6%,10%), Paraoxonase (9%,13%), Cathepsin Z (7%,9%), Matrix metalloproteinase-3 (9%,14%), Retinoic acid receptor responder protein 2 (9%,11%), Intercellular adhesion molecule 2 (8%,11%), Kallikrein-6 (8%,11%), Platelet-derived growth factor subunit A (9%,15%), Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (8%,12%), Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein 2 (9%,15%), von Willebrand factor (8%,12%), Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (7%,10%), C-C motif chemokine 16 (10%,18%), and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (4%,6%).

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and the difference ± SD (for the difference) at 30 and 120 minutes after food intake. Statistical analyses were carried out using Statistica 12 (StatSoft Inc, Tulsa, OK, USA). Comparison between fasting values versus 30 and 120 minutes after food intake for any given biomarker was analyzed for significance with repeated measures ANOVA with Post hoc analysis by Tukey's test. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results and discussion

Table 1 displays descriptive statistics of the study population. The levels for eight biomarkers decreased significantly 30 minutes after food intake. The levels for seven biomarkers remained significantly decreased 120 minutes after food intake. Nine biomarker decreased significantly at 120 minutes after food intake. The changes were between 4–30%, most commonly around 5%. Only six biomarkers showed a difference of 10% or more due to food intake. The biggest differences were observed for Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (30%); Azurocidin, Cystatin-B, and Myeloperoxidase (13%); Monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (11%); and Myeloblastin (10%), all 120 minutes after food intake. A summary of the findings is in Table 2. Statistical significance is reported in three different levels; *(P<0.05), **(P<0.01), and ***(P<0.001). The values between P<0.05 and P<0.01 should be treated with caution because of the possibility of mass significance.
Table 1

Subjects’ anthropometric characteristics.

Values are mean ± SD.

Variable
Sex (male/female)11/11
Body mass (kg)69±10
Height (cm)177±8
BMI (kg/m2)21.8±2.2
BSA (m2)1.8±0.2

Abbreviations: Body mass index (BMI). Body surface area (BSA).

Table 2

Summary of findings for 92 biomarkers before, and the differences 30 and 120 minutes after a standardized meal.

All values are in arbitrary units (Mean±SD). *Indicates significant difference (P<0.05), ** (P<0.01), and ***(P<0.001), compared to fasting values.

VariableFasting (n = 22)Difference 30 minutes after food intake (n = 21)Difference 120 minutes after food intake (n = 22)
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 144.61±0.36-0.31±0.19*-0.36±0.61**
Low-density lipoprotein receptor2.60±0.49-0.05±0.160.03±0.52
Integrin beta-25.03±0.42-0.15±0.22-0.16±0.58
Interleukin-17 receptor A2.67±0.49-0.14±0.15-0.10±0.55
Tumor necrosis factor receptor 24.12±0.43-0.16±0.17-0.11±0.61
Matrix metalloproteinase-95.55±0.52-0.22±0.32-0.34±0.59*
Ephrin type-B receptor 41.05±0.31-0.01±0.13-0.02±0.43
Interleukin-2 receptor subunit alpha3.28±0.42-0.11±0.16-0.04±0.56
Osteoprotegerin2.22±0.30-0.05±0.200.01±0.53
CD166 antigen4.48±0.35-0.11±0.18-0.02±0.63
Trefoil factor 35.45±1.38-0.13±0.23-0.08±0.60
P-selectin9.30±0.61-0.34±0.30*-0.48±0.69**
Cystatin-B5.11±1.06-0.29±1.15-0.65±1.29*
Monocyte chemotactic protein 13.44±0.41-0.30±0.28*-0.33±0.68**
Scavenger receptor cysteine-rich type 1 protein M1305.87±0.63-0.13±0.15-0.04±0.58
Galectin-34.95±0.43-0.09±0.23-0.13±0.65
Granulins5.82±0.31-0.10±0.16-0.04±0.54
Matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein1.70±0.69-0.13±0.21-0.13±0.56
Bleomycin hydrolase5.95±0.61-0.01±0.33-0.13±0.72
Perlecan5.66±0.38-0.00±0.36-0.07±0.62
Lymphotoxin-beta receptor2.65±0.36-0.14±0.19-0.06±0.59
Neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 32.32±0.59-0.15±0.18-0.06±0.60
Metalloproteinase inhibitor 42.60±0.49-0.16±0.200.04±0.64
Contactin-12.04±0.37-0.10±0.17-0.02±0.57
Cadherin-52.44±0.42-0.12±0.19-0.03±0.62
Trem-like transcript 2 protein4.87±0.44-0.26±0.26-0.29±0.73
Fatty acid-binding protein, adipocyte4.05±0.62-0.05±0.18-0.04±0.65
Tissue factor pathway inhibitor7.63±0.51-0.06±0.220.12±0.61
Plasminogen activator inhibitor 17.65±0.47-0.13±0.17-0.03±0.51
C-C motif chemokine 245.21±0.87-0.09±0.19-0.02±0.63
Transferrin receptor protein 13.68±0.70-0.10±0.11-0.07±0.33
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 10C4.90±0.63-0.10±0.15-0.06±0.53
Growth/differentiation factor 153.35±0.46-0.14±0.20-0.07±0.62
E-selectin2.62±0.55-0.09±0.14-0.04±0.52
Azurocidin6.46±1.01-0.48±0.50*-0.86±0.83***
Protein delta homolog 14.78±0.78-0.15±0.17-0.07±0.61
Spondin-10.46±0.24-0.08±0.16-0.03±0.38
Myeloperoxidase4.99±0.65-0.37±0.38*-0.67±0.57***
C-X-C motif chemokine 164.66±0.34-0.13±0.20-0.06±0.60
Interleukin-6 receptor subunit alpha10.84±0.39-0.10±0.17-0.02±0.56
Resistin6.34±0.63-0.26±0.22-0.40±0.66**
Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 14.40±1.05-0.15±0.47-1.32±0.77***
Chitotriosidase-14.46±1.40-0.21±0.18-0.25±0.62
Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 52.87±0.57-0.20±0.25-0.09±0.65
C-C motif chemokine 223.31±1.28-0.12±0.17-0.04±0.57
Pulmonary surfactant-associated protein D1.69±0.70-0.12±0.22-0.01±0.49
Elafin4.46±0.57-0.11±0.21-0.12±0.58
Epithelial cell adhesion molecule5.10±1.02-0.10±0.20-0.15±0.61
Aminopeptidase N4.44±0.40-0.09±0.14-0.03±0.54
Tyrosine-protein kinase receptor UFO6.92±0.49-0.10±0.16-0.02±0.61
Interleukin-1 receptor type 15.68±0.39-0.13±0.18-0.03±0.61
Matrix metalloproteinase-23.53±0.48-0.16±0.18-0.08±0.65
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 64.21±0.43-0.12±0.15-0.06±0.60
Myoglobin5.93±0.80-0.05±0.21-0.08±0.67
Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 13B5.62±0.39-0.11±0.15-0.01±0.59
Myeloblastin7.02±0.82-0.42±0.39*-0.74±0.83***
Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 90.82±0.30-0.10±0.19-0.04±0.45
Urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor4.49±0.46-0.16±0.24-0.28±0.61*
Osteopontin3.48±0.55-0.02±0.170.14±0.64
Cathepsin D4.55±0.34-0.17±0.21-0.06±0.59
Peptidoglycan recognition protein 17.58±0.61-0.26±0.25-0.42±0.66**
Carboxypeptidase A14.55±0.52-0.05±0.220.14±0.62
Junctional adhesion molecule A4.56±0.32-0.11±0.93-0.41±0.65*
Galectin-42.14±0.46-0.18±0.21-0.24±0.58
Interleukin-1 receptor type 24.55±0.48-0.12±0.16-0.03±0.57
Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type substrate 12.80±0.34-0.09±0.14-0.02±0.57
C-C motif chemokine 156.03±0.49-0.16±0.18-0.11±0.62
Caspase-36.66±0.690.02±1.00-0.60±0.86*
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator4.35±0.48-0.22±0.18*-0.19±0.56
Carboxypeptidase B3.38±0.55-0.04±0.230.19±0.64
Chitinase-3-like protein 16.47±0.44-0.21±0.20-0.31±0.60*
ST2 protein2.98±0.80-0.05±0.150.10±0.58
Tissue-type plasminogen activator4.57±0.76-0.16±0.17-0.15±0.66
Secretoglobin family 3A member 23.10±0.82-0.18±0.16-0.15±0.54
Epidermal growth factor receptor2.67±0.35-0.10±0.15-0.03±0.54
Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 73.39±0.57-0.20±0.22-0.08±0.76
Complement component C1q receptor8.76±0.37-0.11±0.16-0.04±0.50
Interleukin-18-binding protein4.66±0.43-0.12±0.18-0.03±0.60
Collagen alpha-1(I) chain3.71±0.56-0.11±0.180.00±0.45
Paraoxonase (PON 3)6.30±0.82-0.10±0.19-0.00±0.63
Cathepsin Z4.57±0.37-0.13±0.190.00±0.59
Matrix metalloproteinase-35.98±0.88-0.33±0.21*-0.45±0.63***
Retinoic acid receptor responder protein 210.64±0.26-0.12±0.14-0.05±0.45
Intercellular adhesion molecule 24.26±0.40-0.14±0.17-0.04±0.62
Kallikrein-65.80±0.34-0.02±0.20-0.05±0.59
Platelet-derived growth factor subunit A5.62±0.71-0.20±0.21-0.05±0.66
Tumor necrosis factor receptor 15.79±0.39-0.15±0.21-0.14±0.56
Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein 26.81±0.89-0.09±0.160.11±0.57
von Willebrand factor6.56±0.46-0.17±0.30-0.25±0.74
Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule4.43±0.39-0.08±0.69-0.23±0.60
C-C motif chemokine 166.02±0.46-0.13±0.20-0.04±0.65
N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide0.69±0.61-0.03±0.220.11±0.47

Subjects’ anthropometric characteristics.

Values are mean ± SD. Abbreviations: Body mass index (BMI). Body surface area (BSA).

Summary of findings for 92 biomarkers before, and the differences 30 and 120 minutes after a standardized meal.

All values are in arbitrary units (Mean±SD). *Indicates significant difference (P<0.05), ** (P<0.01), and ***(P<0.001), compared to fasting values. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the effect of food intake on plasma proteins measured by the Proseek Multiplex CVD III kit. This investigation showed that 17 of the 92 investigated biomarkers were affected by food intake. The changes were, however, modest. Only six biomarkers showed a difference of 10% or more due to food intake. The changes were, for the most part, around 5%. The observed effects of food intake are approximately half of the intra- and interassay variation which are about 10% for most of the biomarkers. This suggests that the need to standardize food intake is not generally necessary when using this kit (Proseek Multiplex CVD III). There were, however, some exceptions. The biggest differences were observed for Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (30%); Azurocidin, Cystatin-B, and Myeloperoxidase (13%); Monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (11%); and Myeloblastin (10%), all 120 minutes after food intake. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 has been shown to predict cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with acute myocardial infarction [19,20]. The level of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein has been shown to regulate insulin-like growth factor-I bioactivity, glucose homeostasis, and tissue regeneration, and increases during inflammation [21]. It is known that insulin suppresses the insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 expression [22]. This may explain why we observed a significantly lower level of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 in the postprandial period in our study. It could, however, be difficult in the acute setting to standardize food intake, but our findings clearly suggest that this should be done when investigating Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1. Inflammation has been suggested to be the underlying pathogenesis of a range of the most common cardiovascular diseases [23,24]. Myeloblastin is a protease that degrades proteins such as elastin, fibronectin, laminin and collagen and has mainly been investigated in vasculitis [25]. Azurocidin, also known as cationic antimicrobial protein CAP37 or heparin-binding protein is an important multifunctional inflammatory mediator [26]. Myeloperoxidase has also been shown to be an inflammatory marker in coronary heart disease [24]. A postprandial increase in white blood cell and platelet counts and a decrease in the release of myeloperoxidase from polymorphonuclear leukocyte has previously been observed [27]. In our study, we also observed a decreased Myeloperoxidase level in the postprandial period. Both Cystatin-B, and Monocyte chemotactic protein 1 have both recently been investigated in large population studies and have been associated with an increased incidence of CVD [5,9]. The difference of 10–13% for Myeloblastin, Cystatin-B, Monocyte chemotactic protein 1, Azurocidin and Myeloperoxidase suggests that not standardizing food intake prior to sampling may introduce additional error. Recent technological advances makes it possible to measure multiple plasma proteins simultaneously. In the current study the Proseek Multiplex CVD III kit was used to simultaneously measure 92 plasma proteins. The proteins have been selected because of their importance in cardiovascular disease. According to the manufacturer, 28 of the biomarkers are inflammatory/immune system, 25 exploratory, 21 CVD, 11 metabolic and 6 CVD/Inflammation. This technology has recently been used in a multitude of studies [3-9], and our investigation adds methodological information in this developing field. We are aware of only one study that has evaluated the impact of food intake on the biomarkers in the present study. Jahn and co-workers evaluated the effect of food intake on 26 of the 91 biomarkers in the present study [28]. This study evaluated the biomarker levels before and 240 minutes after a high-fat breakfast in 16 healthy and 18 metabolic syndrome subjects. Their findings were partly at odds with the present investigation. The findings in the study by Jahn et al. and in our study were concordant for 11 biomarkers (Growth differentiation factor-15, TNF receptor 1, Interleukin-6 receptor subunit alpha, TNF-receptor 2, FAS receptor, ST2 protein, Cathepsin D, Integrin beta binding protein 2, Spondin-1, Epidermal growth factor recptor, N-terminal prohormone-BNP), whereas it was not for 15 biomarkers. It is interesting to observe that Jahn et al. found no change in 7 biomarkers where we did (Cystatin B, Monocyte chemotactic protein 1, TNF-receptor superfamily member 14, Myloperoxidase, Resistin, Chitinase-3-like protein 1, Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor), and the opposite was also found for 8 biomarkers (Matrix metalloproteinase-3, Galectin-3, E-selectin, Osteoprotegerin, Kallikrein-6, Myoglobin, Tissue plasminogen activator, Fatty acid binding protein-4). The differences can most probably be explained by the differences in statistical analysis, observation time, or the differences in the meal composition between the studies. There are some limitations that should be addressed. The present investigation studied the effect of food intake only in young healthy Caucasian subjects. Studies are warranted in older healthy subjects, different ethnic groups, and in patients with various cardiac diseases to determine whether the findings in the present investigation are reproducible in such populations. Future investigations should also address the effect of meal size and different diets such as high or low fat [29]. In conclusion, the present investigation shows that several biomarkers that have been used to investigate CVD are affected by food intake, but the effect is predominantly modest. Timing of blood sampling in relation to food intake, therefore, appears not to be a major concern. There are, however, some exceptions. Caution concerning food intake should be taken when investigating Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1, Azurocidin, Cystatin-B, Myeloperoxidase, Monocyte chemotactic protein 1, or Myeloblastin.
  29 in total

1.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916.

Authors:  D Du Bois; E F Du Bois
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

2.  Insulin Enhances Endothelial Function Throughout the Arterial Tree in Healthy But Not Metabolic Syndrome Subjects.

Authors:  Linda A Jahn; Lee Hartline; Nagashree Rao; Brent Logan; Justin J Kim; Kevin Aylor; Li-Ming Gan; Helena U Westergren; Eugene J Barrett
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Consumption of a high-fat breakfast on consecutive days alters preclinical biomarkers for atherosclerosis.

Authors:  B K McFarlin; K C Carpenter; A L Henning; A S Venable
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Relationship between postprandial changes in cardiac left ventricular function, glucose and insulin concentrations, gastric emptying, and satiety in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Joanna Hlebowicz; Sandra Lindstedt; Ola Björgell; Magnus Dencker
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Use of a proximity extension assay proteomics chip to discover new biomarkers for human atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Lars Lind; Johan Ärnlöv; Bertil Lindahl; Agneta Siegbahn; Johan Sundström; Erik Ingelsson
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.162

Review 6.  Azurocidin -- inactive serine proteinase homolog acting as a multifunctional inflammatory mediator.

Authors:  Wiesław Watorek
Journal:  Acta Biochim Pol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.149

7.  Direct regulation of IGF-binding protein 1 promoter by interleukin-1β via an insulin- and FoxO-1-independent mechanism.

Authors:  L Shi; D Banerjee; A Dobierzewska; S Sathishkumar; A A Karakashian; N V Giltiay; M N Nikolova-Karakashian
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 8.  Inflammatory biomarkers of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Hongyu Li; Kai Sun; Ruiping Zhao; Jiang Hu; Zhiru Hao; Fei Wang; Yaojun Lu; Fu Liu; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2017-01-01

Review 9.  The Energy Content and Composition of Meals Consumed after an Overnight Fast and Their Effects on Diet Induced Thermogenesis: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analyses and Meta-Regressions.

Authors:  Angelica Quatela; Robin Callister; Amanda Patterson; Lesley MacDonald-Wicks
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Effect of food intake on left ventricular wall stress.

Authors:  Ylva Gårdinger; Joanna Hlebowicz; Ola Björgell; Magnus Dencker
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.062

View more
  2 in total

1.  Deciphering the Plasma Proteome of Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Mohamed A Elhadad; Christian Jonasson; Cornelia Huth; Rory Wilson; Christian Gieger; Pamela Matias; Harald Grallert; Johannes Graumann; Valerie Gailus-Durner; Wolfgang Rathmann; Christine von Toerne; Stefanie M Hauck; Wolfgang Koenig; Moritz F Sinner; Tudor I Oprea; Karsten Suhre; Barbara Thorand; Kristian Hveem; Annette Peters; Melanie Waldenberger
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 9.461

2.  Cancer-related proteins in serum are altered in workers occupationally exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ayman Alhamdow; Håkan Tinnerberg; Christian Lindh; Maria Albin; Karin Broberg
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 4.944

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.