Literature DB >> 28585055

Forgetting from lapses of sustained attention.

Megan T deBettencourt1,2,3, Kenneth A Norman4,5, Nicholas B Turk-Browne4,5.   

Abstract

When performing any task for an extended period of time, attention fluctuates between good and bad states. These fluctuations affect performance in the moment, but may also have lasting consequences for what gets encoded into memory. Experiment 1 establishes this relationship between attentional states and memory, by showing that subsequent memory for an item was predicted by a response time index of sustained attention (average response time during the three trials prior to stimulus onset). Experiment 2 strengthens the causal interpretation of this predictive relationship by treating the sustained attention index as an independent variable to trigger the appearance of an encoding trial. Subsequent memory was better when items were triggered from good versus bad attentional states. Together, these findings suggest that sustained attention can have downstream consequences for what we remember, and they highlight the inferential utility of adaptive experimental designs. By continuously monitoring attention, we can influence what will later be remembered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distraction; Episodic memory; Goal-directed attention; Real time

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28585055      PMCID: PMC5716934          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1309-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

1.  Contralateral Delay Activity Tracks Fluctuations in Working Memory Performance.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Matthew K Robison; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory.

Authors:  Megan T deBettencourt; Paul A Keene; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-05-20

3.  Monitoring the ebb and flow of attention: Does controlling the onset of stimuli during encoding enhance memory?

Authors:  Trisha N Patel; Mark Steyvers; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

4.  Independent subsequent memory effects of conflict resolution and response inhibition.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Fangqin Sun; Gloria A Dietz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-08-12

5.  Sustained Attention and Spatial Attention Distinctly Influence Long-term Memory Encoding.

Authors:  Megan T deBettencourt; Stephanie D Williams; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.420

6.  Evaluating the learning of stimulus-control associations through incidental memory of reinforcement events.

Authors:  Christina Bejjani; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.140

7.  Shifting expectations: Lapses in spatial attention are driven by anticipatory attentional shifts.

Authors:  Christopher M Jones; Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  A generalized cortical activity pattern at internally generated mental context boundaries during unguided narrative recall.

Authors:  Hongmi Lee; Janice Chen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 8.713

9.  Neural signatures of attentional engagement during narratives and its consequences for event memory.

Authors:  Hayoung Song; Emily S Finn; Monica D Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The road to long-term memory: Top-down attention is more effective than bottom-up attention for forming long-term memories.

Authors:  Edyta Sasin; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.