Literature DB >> 28585041

Clinical Impact of Mismatch Repair Protein Testing on Outcome of Early Staged Colorectal Carcinomas.

Jatin Sundersham Gandhi1, Malini Goswami2, Anila Sharma2, Parul Tanwar2, Gurudutt Gupta2, Nikhil Gupta3, Sunil Pasricha2, Anurag Mehta2, Shivender Singh3, Mohit Agarwal4, Nitin Gupta5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men and second most common in women globally. In the present study, we aimed to analyse the proportion of patients with loss of immunostaining for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in all newly diagnosed stage II cases of colorectal cancer for the purpose of prognostication, for determination of further chemotherapeutic strategy and for familial screening.
METHOD: From January 2014 to December 2015, 62 consecutive newly diagnosed cases of stage II colorectal cancer were included in the study. Details of each patient related to their demographic profile and tumour profile were recorded. All the cases were grossed and staged according to College of American Pathologist (CAP) guidelines. The expression of MMR proteins (which was earlier validated on normal as well as tumour tissue) in FFPE tumour tissue using IHC for mut L homologue 1 (MLH1), mut S homologue 2 (MSH2), mut S homologue 6 (MSH6) and post-meiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2) was studied. Information regarding stage, treatment, clinical outcome and overall survival was retrieved when available.
RESULTS: Out of a total of 371 cases, 62 (16.7%) cases were of stage II CRC, out of which 43 (12%) were treatment naive. Among the selected 62 cases, 26 (41.9%) demonstrated loss of MMR proteins and 36 (58.0%) cases had intact nuclear expression. Out of the cases with MMR loss, 38.4% showed loss of MLH1 and PMS2, 30.7% showed loss of MSH2 and MSH6, 26.9% showed isolated loss of PMS2 and 3.8% showed isolated loss of MSH6. Right-sided location (57.6%) was more common than left-sided (19.2%) and transverse colon (23.0%). Majority of the cases were moderately differentiated (65.3%) in morphology. There was no intratumoural infiltrate in most of the cases (53.8%), and only 3.8% cases showed marked intratumoural infiltrate. Also, peritumoural lymphocytic infiltrate was mild to moderate in most of the cases (26.9%) and marked Crohn's-like infiltrate was seen in only 7.6% cases.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the routine evaluation of MMR proteins is achievable and essential for the purpose of prognostication, planning of treatment strategies and ascertaining a hereditary basis of CRC. The incidence of MMR protein loss was quite high in our study compared to other studies probably due to a difference in ethnicity. Though a right-sided predominance was supported, none of the typical morphological features of microsatellite instability (MSI) tumours were substantiated by our study, highlighting the lack of importance of histology for predicting MSI, and emphasising the point that MSI testing should be done as a routine procedure in all stage II CRC. A short follow-up was done for all our cases and comparison between the survival of the chemotherapy treated MSI cases versus those which were treatment naïve was performed and revealed that chemotherapy (CT) did not provide additional benefit to survival; MSI tumours in general are a better prognostic category and do not require additional chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal carcinoma; Immunohistochemistry; MMR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28585041     DOI: 10.1007/s12029-017-9954-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer


  26 in total

1.  P53 alteration and microsatellite instability have predictive value for survival benefit from chemotherapy in stage III colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  H Elsaleh; B Powell; K McCaul; F Grieu; R Grant; D Joseph; B Iacopetta
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Clinical uses of microsatellite instability testing in colorectal cancer: an ongoing challenge.

Authors:  C Richard Boland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter correlates with lack of expression of hMLH1 in sporadic colon tumors and mismatch repair-defective human tumor cell lines.

Authors:  M F Kane; M Loda; G M Gaida; J Lipman; R Mishra; H Goldman; J M Jessup; R Kolodner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Histopathological identification of colon cancer with microsatellite instability.

Authors:  J Alexander; T Watanabe; T T Wu; A Rashid; S Li; S R Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  Cancer risk and diet in India.

Authors:  R Sinha; D E Anderson; S S McDonald; P Greenwald
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.476

Review 6.  A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C R Boland; S N Thibodeau; S R Hamilton; D Sidransky; J R Eshleman; R W Burt; S J Meltzer; M A Rodriguez-Bigas; R Fodde; G N Ranzani; S Srivastava
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Clues to the pathogenesis of familial colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L A Aaltonen; P Peltomäki; F S Leach; P Sistonen; L Pylkkänen; J P Mecklin; H Järvinen; S M Powell; J Jen; S R Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Value of histopathology in predicting microsatellite instability in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and sporadic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jinru Shia; Nathan A Ellis; Philip B Paty; Garrett M Nash; Jing Qin; Kenneth Offit; Xin-Min Zhang; Arnold J Markowitz; Khedoudja Nafa; Jose G Guillem; W Douglas Wong; William L Gerald; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Replication errors in benign and malignant tumors from hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  L A Aaltonen; P Peltomäki; J P Mecklin; H Järvinen; J R Jass; J S Green; H T Lynch; P Watson; G Tallqvist; M Juhola
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing for screening colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Part I. The utility of immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Jinru Shia
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sensitization of colorectal cancer to irinotecan therapy by PARP inhibitor rucaparib.

Authors:  Titto Augustine; Radhashree Maitra; Jinghang Zhang; Jay Nayak; Sanjay Goel
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Analysis of the Clinicopathological Characteristics of Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer Patients Deficient in Mismatch Repair Proteins.

Authors:  Yichao Liang; Xinling Cai; Xu Zheng; Hongzhuan Yin
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.147

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.