| Literature DB >> 28585012 |
Tomasz Zubala1, Magdalena Patro2, Patrycja Boguta3.
Abstract
Several years of observations enabled us to assess the extent and variability of heavy metal contamination (Zn, Cu and Pb) of the sludge of the municipal stormwater treatment plant (the town of Puławy, Poland). In terms of size (high capacity) and innovation, it is the only facility of this kind in the country. It collects rainwater run-offs from two catchments (separate inlets) with a total area of about 500 ha. The concentration of the analysed metals is characterised by a large spatial and temporal diversity. The reason for this may be differences in the manner and intensity of use of drained surfaces and different hydraulic conditions (of sedimentation) prevailing in the particular treatment devices. The highest pollution was found in sediments in the grit chamber and in the part of the settler from the side of the interceptor supplying sewage, i.e. from the main traffic route of the town (heavy traffic and developed technical infrastructure). The best-quality sludge was retained in the pond for treated wastewater. In the pool of analysed components, the largest share is Zn, which amounts to about 85%. The content of heavy metals limits the possibility of the natural use of sludge from the municipal stormwater treatment plant. In chemical terms, they should be seen as a potentially dangerous waste and undergo remediation.Entities:
Keywords: Heavy metals; Pollutants; Rainwater sewage; Sludge
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28585012 PMCID: PMC5508032 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9338-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1Location of the studied stormwater treatment plant (www.geoportal.gov.pl)
Fig. 2Scheme of the stormwater treatment plant with location of sampling points of bottom sediments
Fig. 3Basic devices of the stormwater treatment plant
Characteristic values of the analysed pollution indicators of sewage sludge
| Variables | Stage | Minimal value | Maximum value | Average | Median | Standard deviation | Variation coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zn | Grit chamber no. 1 | 218.9 | 293.3 | 248.4 | 239.0 | 26.7 | 10.8 |
| Grit chamber no. 2 | 100.7 | 131.0 | 112.0 | 111.2 | 10.1 | 9.0 | |
| Settler | 54.2 | 334.0 | 156.3 | 135.8 | 90.7 | 58.0 | |
| Retention pond | 49.0 | 174.5 | 94.2 | 76.4 | 47.7 | 50.6 | |
| Cu | Grit chamber no. 1 | 15.0 | 30.4 | 19.7 | 18.0 | 5.3 | 27.1 |
| Grit chamber no. 2 | 6.0 | 10.4 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 1.4 | 16.8 | |
| Settler | 4.1 | 31.9 | 11.0 | 7.9 | 8.9 | 80.6 | |
| Retention pond | 4.7 | 11.6 | 6.7 | 6.2 | 2.1 | 31.9 | |
| Pb | Grit chamber no. 1 | 12.4 | 54.6 | 30.4 | 26.7 | 14.8 | 48.7 |
| Grit chamber no. 2 | 11.4 | 18.3 | 14.2 | 14.0 | 2.3 | 16.4 | |
| Settler | 5.6 | 59.3 | 21.0 | 17.1 | 16.6 | 79.2 | |
| Retention pond | 4.1 | 19.1 | 10.1 | 10.3 | 5.4 | 53.4 |
Percentage differences between the average concentrations of metals at particular observation posts (“−” - decrease, “+” - increase)
| Variables | Sampling points (comparison) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a-2a | 1a-1b | 1b-1c | 2a-2b | 2b-2c | Settler-pond | |
| Zn | −51.3 | +11.0 | −19.3 | −4.8 | −6.9 | −39.7 |
| Cu | −52.4 | +8.5 | −26.8 | −8.9 | −14.6 | −39.1 |
| Pb | −51.6 | +14.8 | −9.8 | +6.6 | −13.7 | −51.9 |
Comparison of average concentrations of metals in sludge of the treatment plant in Puławy (own studies) with average accumulation in exemplary rainwater reservoirs (literature data)
| Variables | Treatment plant in Puławy | Literature data | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grit chamber 1 | Grit chamber 2 | Settler | Retention pond | Wetlands, retention pondsa | Infiltration basinb | Detention pondc | Drainage system pondsd | |
| Zn | 248.4 | 112.0 | 156.3 | 94.2 | 495.0 | 1586.2 | 189.0 | 89.6 |
| Cu | 19.7 | 8.6 | 11.0 | 6.7 | 51.0 | 244.8 | 51.3 | 18.4 |
| Pb | 30.4 | 14.2 | 21.0 | 10.1 | 78.0 | 338.8 | 34.0 | 23.1 |
aAllinson et al. (2015)
bEl-Mufleh et al. (2014)
cFärm (2002)
dHeal et al. (2006)