Literature DB >> 28584955

Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli.

Mike E Le Pelley1, Tina Seabrooke2,3, Briana L Kennedy2,4, Daniel Pearson2, Steven B Most2.   

Abstract

Recent studies of visual search suggest that learning about valued outcomes (rewards and punishments) influences the likelihood that distractors will capture spatial attention and slow search for a target, even when those value-related distractors have never themselves been the targets of search. In the present study, we demonstrated a related effect in the context of temporal, rather than spatial, selection. Participants were presented with a temporal stream of pictures in a fixed central location and had to identify the orientation of a rotated target picture. Response accuracy was reduced if the rotated target was preceded by a "valued" distractor picture that signaled that a correct response to the target would be rewarded (and an incorrect response punished), relative to a distractor picture that did not signal reward or punishment. This effect of signal value on response accuracy was short-lived, being most prominent with a short lag between distractor and target. Impairment caused by a valued distractor was observed if participants were explicitly instructed regarding its relation to reward/punishment (Exps. 1, 3, and 4), or if they could learn this relationship only via trial-by-trial experience (Exp. 2). These findings show that the influence of signal value on attentional capture extends to temporal selection, and also demonstrate that value-related distractors can interfere with the conscious perception of subsequent target information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention in learning; Attentional blink; Attentional capture; Reward; Visual awareness

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28584955     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1346-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  6 in total

1.  Attentional capture by signals of reward persists following outcome devaluation.

Authors:  Poppy Watson; Yenti Pavri; Jenny Le; Daniel Pearson; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.699

2.  Knowledge about the predictive value of reward conditioned stimuli modulates their interference with cognitive processes.

Authors:  Mateo Leganes-Fonteneau; Kyriaki Nikolaou; Ryan Scott; Theodora Duka
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Attentional Orienting by Non-informative Cue Is Shaped via Reinforcement Learning.

Authors:  Sang A Cho; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-15

Review 4.  Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.

Authors:  Michel Failing; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

5.  Reward-Related Suppression of Neural Activity in Macaque Visual Area V4.

Authors:  Katharine A Shapcott; Joscha T Schmiedt; Kleopatra Kouroupaki; Ricardo Kienitz; Andreea Lazar; Wolf Singer; Michael C Schmid
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Attentional capture by Pavlovian reward-signalling distractors in visual search persists when rewards are removed.

Authors:  Poppy Watson; Daniel Pearson; Steven B Most; Jan Theeuwes; Reinout W Wiers; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.