Literature DB >> 28584735

C-reactive Protein: A Prognostic Indicator.

Mandeep Kaur1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28584735      PMCID: PMC5441268          DOI: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_63_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res        ISSN: 2229-516X


× No keyword cloud information.
C-reactive protein (CRP) is a serum acute phase reactant and a valuable inflammatory biomarker in various clinical conditions. It was first discovered by Tillett and Francis (1930) in the serum of patients with pneumonia but was isolated in 1941.[1] CRP derives its name due to ability of the CRP to react with C-polysaccharide isolated from pneumococcal cell walls. The CRP gene is located on the first chromosome. It is an inducible protein which is secreted mainly by hepatocytes in response to inflammatory stimulus. It functions by binding to pathogens and activating the complement system of the body.[2] It is also produced in small amount by nonhepatic cells such as neurons, atherosclerotic plaques, monocytes, kupffer cells, and lymphocytes.[34] CRP levels can be easily measured and standardized and provide similar results in fresh or stored state reflecting the stability of protein. It neither varies from person to person nor influenced by genetic makeup or gender of the patient. Thus, it is considered to be relatively stable serum protein compared with many other markers. In most healthy controls, plasma levels of CRP are usually 1 mg/L, with the normal range defined as <10 mg/L. Plasma levels increase within 4–6 h after initial tissue injury and continue to increase several hundredfold within 24–48 h. They rapidly disappear as the infection, or inflammatory process resolves.[5] CRP is a useful indicator to assess and monitor the presence, severity, and course of the inflammatory response in infectious and noninfectious disorders including acute myocardial infarction, angina, malignancies, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, burns, trauma, and after surgical procedures.[678] It also serves as a prognostic indicator in a variety of clinical conditions such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In this condition, elevation of CRP levels is related to increased risk of myocardial infarction. Nowadays, high-sensitivity CRP is being increasingly used as a tool for cardiac risk evaluation and as a prognostic factor in ACS.[9] It measures CRP exactly the same as the conventional test but is capable of detecting much lower CRP concentrations (detection limit of 0.03 mg/L). CRP is a strong predictor for adverse long-term events in patients with type B acute aortic dissection. Higher are the CRP values, and worse is the prognosis and outcome of the disease.[9] CRP also appears valuable in predicting the clinical outcome and prognosis of many solid tumors such as lung, pancreas, hepatocellular, and urological cancers.[10] High levels of CRP predict poor prognosis in patients with these tumors. It may also help predict tumor recurrence and treatment response. The CRP also has a role in predicting the risk of rebleeding in patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.[11] CRP is considered to be a strong predictor of prognosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. High level of serum CRP is associated with an increased risk of mortality in these patients.[12] Elevated CRP levels at ICU discharge also have a poor prognosis. These high levels are associated with readmission and in-hospital mortality.[13] Although CRP is a valuable marker to predict prognosis and other important clinical outcomes in many diseases, better designed large-scale studies on the role of CRP as a prognostic indicator are needed to confirm these observations.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of C-reactive protein in pediatrics.

Authors:  D L Jaye; K B Waites
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 2.  C-reactive protein: a critical review.

Authors:  B Young; M Gleeson; A W Cripps
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.306

3.  C-reactive protein as a prognostic indicator for rebleeding in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Han Hee Lee; Jae Myung Park; Soon-Wook Lee; Seung Hun Kang; Chul-Hyun Lim; Yu Kyung Cho; Bo-In Lee; In Seok Lee; Sang Woo Kim; Myung-Gyu Choi
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 4.  C-reactive protein: risk marker or mediator in atherothrombosis?

Authors:  Ishwarlal Jialal; Sridevi Devaraj; Senthil K Venugopal
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2004-05-17       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  SEROLOGICAL REACTIONS IN PNEUMONIA WITH A NON-PROTEIN SOMATIC FRACTION OF PNEUMOCOCCUS.

Authors:  W S Tillett; T Francis
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1930-09-30       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  C-reactive protein as a prognostic marker in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Zai-Chun Deng; Peng Zhao; Chao Cao; Shi-Fang Sun; Feng Zhao; Chao-Yue Lu; Hong-Ying Ma
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Elevated C-reactive protein levels at ICU discharge as a predictor of ICU outcome: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  S Sophie Gülcher; Nynke A Bruins; W Peter Kingma; E Christiaan Boerma
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 8.  C-Reactive Protein Is an Important Biomarker for Prognosis Tumor Recurrence and Treatment Response in Adult Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shiva Shrotriya; Declan Walsh; Nabila Bennani-Baiti; Shirley Thomas; Cliona Lorton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Elevated inflammatory biomarkers and poor outcomes in intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Edward R Bader; Tiberiu A Pana; Raphae S Barlas; Anthony K Metcalf; John F Potter; Phyo K Myint
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.682

2.  Prediction of 72-hour mortality in patients with extremely high serum C-reactive protein levels using a novel weighted average of risk scores.

Authors:  Kai Saito; Hitoshi Sugawara; Kiyoshi Ichihara; Tamami Watanabe; Akira Ishii; Takahiko Fukuchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  More evening preference is positively associated with systemic inflammation in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes patients.

Authors:  Hataikarn Nimitphong; Apichana Mahattanapreut; La-Or Chailurkit; Sunee Saetung; Nantaporn Siwasaranond; Rungtip Sumritsopak; Thunyarat Anothaisintawee; Ammarin Thakkinstian; Lara R Dugas; Brian T Layden; Sirimon Reutrakul
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.