| Literature DB >> 28584642 |
Zengxiang Dong1, Hong Yao1, Zhuangzhuang Miao1, Hao Wang1, Rongsheng Xie1, Ye Wang1, Yingfang Shang1, Chunlin Gong1, Zhaoguang Liang1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the pharmacological conversion of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) using amiodarone or/and ibutilide. Seventy-nine consecutive patients (48 males and 31 females; mean age, 64.6±11.2 years; range, 40-80 years) with non-valvular chronic AF lasting >7 days (range, 7-97 days) that were admitted to hospital for elective pharmacological cardioversion were randomly assigned to receive treatment with intravenous ibutilide (1 mg plus an additional 1 mg if required; n=39) or intravenous amiodarone (300 mg) plus intravenous ibutilide (1 mg; n=40). Success rates of cardioversion were 51.3% (20/39 patients) for ibutilide alone and 71.8% (28/39 patients) for amiodarone + ibutilide (P<0.05). A comparable increase in the QTc interval was observed in the two groups. It was observed that the co-administration of amiodarone and ibutilide was safer than ibutilide alone with regard to the risk of ventricular arrhythmia. Forty-eight patients of successful cardioversion were personally contacted for follow-up. The result indicated that the sinus rhythm maintenance time of the amiodarone + ibutilide group (4.36±2.44 months) was significantly higher than that of the ibutilide group (2.34±1.75 months; P<0.01). In conclusion, pretreatment with intravenous amiodarone + ibutilide for pharmacological cardioversion of persistent AF is considered to be more effective and safer than treatment with ibutilide alone.Entities:
Keywords: amiodarone; atrial fibrillation; cardioversion rate; ibutilide
Year: 2017 PMID: 28584642 PMCID: PMC5449953 DOI: 10.3892/br.2017.896
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Rep ISSN: 2049-9434